Diferences in 3D Gait Analysis After Various Types of Total Hip Arthroplasty
3DGAHIP
Comparative 3D Gait Analysis: Impact of Total Hip Arthroplasty Stem Anchoring (Metadiaphyseal vs Metaphyseal)
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with hip osteoarthritis who were indicated for total hip arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either a short (metaphyseal) stem or a conventional (metadiaphyseal) stem hip arthroplasty. Three-dimensional gait analysis was performed regularly (preoperatively and at multiple postoperative time points) to determine whether conservative implants result in superior objective and patient-reported outcomes
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 5, 2026
CompletedJune 5, 2026
June 1, 2026
4 months
March 30, 2026
June 1, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
3D Gait analysis - Gait Profile Score
The Gait Profile Score (GPS) is a numerical index (range 0-10, the lesser the number, the better for the patient). The GPS comprises of the kinematic parameteres that are also called the Gait Variable Scores (hip flexion, rotation and abduction) and the spatiotemporal parameters (step time, step length and step cadence). All of these parameters are also mentioned ad separate outcome measures. The extraction of GPS from the 2 basic data groups was done automaticaly through specialised software which is based on the work of Baker et al. (Baker R, McGinley JL, Schwartz MH, et al. The gait profile score and movement analysis profile. Gait Posture. 2009;30(3):265-269. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.020).
from preoperative to 1 year postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The Modified Harris Hip Score
from preoperative to 1 year postoperative
Other Outcomes (6)
Step Time
from preoperative to 1 year postoperative
Hip flexion
from preoperative to 1 year postoperative
Step length
From preoperative to 1 year postoperative
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conservative (metaphyseal) stem hip arthroplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATORHip arthroplasty is performed through a minimally invasive anterolateral hip approach. All replacements are completely non-cemented, articulations include polyethylene or ceramic inserts on ceramic heads. Cups are standardly fixed through press-fit principle, no additional pelvis screws were standardly used. Special curved femoral reamers are used in order to consume as little bone stock as possible (only the metaphysis) and provide a muscle-sparing approach.
Conventional (metadiaphyseal) stem hip arthroplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATORHip arthroplasty is performed through a minimally invasive anterolateral hip approach. All replacements are completely non-cemented, articulations include polyethylene or ceramic inserts on ceramic heads. Cups are standardly fixed through press-fit principle, no additional pelvis screws were standardly used. Standard femoral preparation is performed with prosthesis taking bone stock from the metadiaphyseal area of proximal femur, however, gluteal insertions were preserved in simillar fashion as in metaphyseal implants.
Interventions
Conservative (metaphyseal) stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Conventional (metadiaphyseal) stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- high-grade hip osteoarthritis
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Masaryk Hospital
Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem Region, 40113, Czechia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2026
First Posted
June 5, 2026
Study Start
September 30, 2024
Primary Completion
January 30, 2025
Study Completion
January 30, 2025
Last Updated
June 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share