NCT04333264

Brief Summary

Randomized prospective study assessing suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty. Group without drainage, 50 hips, compared with group with suction drainage, 50 hips. Both groups will be asses clinically (ROM scale, VAS), laboratory and radiology (USG). In the actually literature there are no benefits using closed suction drainage after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2016

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 30, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 3, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 3, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

March 30, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 1, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

hiparthroplastysuctiondrainage

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Hip hematoma size in USG

    Size in millimeters fluid collection in supine position above femoral neck.

    3 days after surgery

  • Hemoglobin levels

    Hb levels after surgery, difference between two groups

    3 days after surgery

  • C-reactive protein levels

    C-reactive protein levels after surgery, difference between two groups

    3 days after surgery

  • Visual Analog Scale punctation

    Pain level after surgery in Visual Analog Scale scale 0-10 pts. where 0-no pain, 10-most painful.

    3 day after surgery

  • Hip range of movement

    Differences between hip ROM after surgery

    3 days after surgery

  • Wound exudation

    Assessing wound dehiscence after surgery, 1-exudation appear, 0-dry dressing

    3 days after surgery

  • Soft tissue hematoma

    USG hematoma appearance in soft tissue around the hip

    3 days after surgery

  • Intraoperative bleeding

    All amount of blood loss intraoperative with hidden bleeding, with use of Gross formula.

    1 day

  • Blood transfusion

    Need of blood transfusion after operation

    14 days after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Infection

    30 days after surgery

  • Deep vein thrombosis

    30 days after surgery

  • Readmission

    30 days after surgery

Study Arms (2)

suction drainage

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will be dived with randomization in to two groups: with and without closed suction drainage after primary total hip arthroplasty

Procedure: suction drainage

no suction drainage

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will be dived with randomization in to two groups: with and without closed suction drainage after primary total hip arthroplasty

Procedure: no suction drainage

Interventions

After primary total hip arthroplasty closed suction drainage will be used.

suction drainage

After primary total hip arthroplasty closed suction drainage won't be used.

no suction drainage

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age between 30-80
  • primary hip osteoarthritis

You may not qualify if:

  • secondary hip osteoarthritis
  • autoimmune disease
  • congenital or secondary coagulopathy
  • vein or artery thrombosis
  • renal or liver failure
  • cemented or hybrid alloplasty,
  • no consent from the patient

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Bartosz P, Marczynski W, Para M, Kogut M, Bialecki J. Comparative study of suction drainage placement in cementless hip replacement among patients undergoing extended thromboprophylaxis: a prospective randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Aug 13;22(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04583-0.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Suction

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DrainageSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Pawel Bartosz

    Prof. A. Gruca Teaching Hospital in Otwock

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two groups of patients with or without closed suction drainage after primary total hip arthroplasty.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2020

First Posted

April 3, 2020

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion

January 1, 2020

Study Completion

February 1, 2020

Last Updated

April 3, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04