Combined Distal Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Control After Knee Replacement
FEM-COMB
Comparative Study Assessing the Efficacy of a Combined Distal Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia Following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
2 other identifiers
interventional
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to see whether a combined distal femoral nerve block improves pain relief after total knee replacement in adults having planned surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the combined distal femoral nerve block reduce the amount of opioid needed in the post-anesthesia recovery room?
- Does it preserve quadriceps muscle strength while improving postoperative pain control? Researchers will compare the combined distal femoral nerve block to a saphenous nerve block alone to see if the combined block provides better analgesia without reducing leg strength. Participants will:
- Receive either the combined distal femoral nerve block or the saphenous nerve block alone before surgery.
- Also receive standard multimodal pain management, including anesthesia, surgical site infiltration, and postoperative pain medications.
- Be assessed for pain, opioid use, nausea and vomiting, quadriceps strength, time to first standing, hospital stay length, and patient satisfaction from surgery until discharge.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 5, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 25, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 25, 2027
June 5, 2026
May 1, 2026
1 year
May 27, 2026
June 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Opioid Consumption in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).
Total amount of opioids consumed in the post-anesthesia care unit, converted into oral morphine equivalent.
From arrival in PACU until discharge from PACU, on postoperative day 0.
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Pain During Regional Anesthesia
During block administration on postoperative day 0.
Postoperative Pain in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and Ward
Twice in PACU on postoperative day 0 after extubation and before PACU discharge; three times on postoperative day 1; and at hospital discharge (up to 7 days).
Quadriceps Motor Strength
Postoperative day 0 in PACU and postoperative day 1.
Time to First Standing
Postoperative day 0.
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Postoperative day 0 in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Combined Distal Femoral Nerve Block
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive an ultrasound-guided combined distal femoral nerve block targeting the saphenous nerve, vastus medialis nerve, and anterior femoral cutaneous nerves, using ropivacaine 2 mg/mL, 40 mL total, with clonidine 30 micrograms perineural and dexamethasone 8 mg IV. They also receive surgical site infiltration, general anesthesia, and standard multimodal analgesia.
Saphenous Nerve Block Alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive an ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block at the adductor canal using ropivacaine 2 mg/mL, 20 mL total, with clonidine 30 micrograms perineural and dexamethasone 8 mg IV. They also receive surgical site infiltration, general anesthesia, and standard multimodal analgesia.
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided block targeting the saphenous nerve, vastus medialis nerve, and anterior femoral cutaneous nerves, using ropivacaine 2 mg/mL, 40 mL total, with clonidine 30 micrograms perineural and dexamethasone 8 mg IV.
Ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block at the adductor canal, using ropivacaine 2 mg/mL, 20 mL total, with clonidine 30 micrograms perineural and dexamethasone 8 mg IV.
General anesthesia, surgical site infiltration, and multimodal analgesia with paracetamol, nefopam, and ketoprofen.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged over 18 years.
- Scheduled for total knee arthroplasty with multimodal analgesia.
- Affiliated with or benefiting from a social security system.
- Able to understand the study information and provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery.
- Weight under 50 kg.
- Body mass index over 40 kg/m².
- Contraindication to nefopam, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, local anesthetics, or morphine.
- Preoperative opioid use.
- Antidepressant or gabapentinoid treatment.
- Other planned surgical or medical procedures during the study period.
- Inability to understand study information for linguistic, psychological, cognitive, or literacy reasons.
- Pregnancy, possible pregnancy without effective contraception, or breastfeeding.
- Protected adults, including those under guardianship, curatorship, legal protection, detention, or otherwise unable to give informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital privé Dijon Bourgogne
Dijon, 21000, France
Related Publications (15)
Maurice-Szamburski A. Le vécu périopératoire du patient, un nouveau paradigme ? Le Praticien en Anesthésie Réanimation. déc 2017;21(6):285-9.
BACKGROUNDMahdy EW, Abd El-Hamid AM, Elbarbary DH. Comparison between adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for different knee surgical procedures. A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. janv 2021;37(1):491-500.
BACKGROUNDTarpin P, Fumery O, Radji M, Martinez V. La chronicisation de la douleur en anesthésie-réanimation. Anesthésie & Réanimation. mars 2025;11(1):36-45.
BACKGROUNDAuquier P, Pernoud N, Bruder N, Simeoni MC, Auffray JP, Colavolpe C, Francois G, Gouin F, Manelli JC, Martin C, Sapin C, Blache JL. Development and validation of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jun;102(6):1116-23. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200506000-00010.
PMID: 15915023BACKGROUNDWylde V, Bertram W, Sanderson E, Noble S, Howells N, Peters TJ, Beswick AD, Blom AW, Moore AJ, Bruce J, Walsh DA, Eccleston C, Harris S, Garfield K, White S, Toms A, Gooberman-Hill R; STAR trial group. The STAR care pathway for patients with pain at 3 months after total knee replacement: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2022 Jan 28;4(3):e188-e197. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00371-4. eCollection 2022 Mar.
PMID: 35243362BACKGROUNDMei S, Jin S, Chen Z, Ding X, Zhao X, Li Q. Analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing local infiltration and femoral nerve block. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Sep;70(9):648-53. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(09)09.
PMID: 26375568BACKGROUNDGadsden JC, Sata S, Bullock WM, Kumar AH, Grant SA, Dooley JR. The relative analgesic value of a femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;73(5):417-424. doi: 10.4097/kja.20269. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
PMID: 32842722BACKGROUNDKuang MJ, Ma JX, Fu L, He WW, Zhao J, Ma XL. Is Adductor Canal Block Better Than Femoral Nerve Block in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? A GRADE Analysis of the Evidence Through a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3238-3248.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 17.
PMID: 28606458BACKGROUNDWang D, Yang Y, Li Q, Tang SL, Zeng WN, Xu J, Xie TH, Pei FX, Yang L, Li LL, Zhou ZK. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 12;7:40721. doi: 10.1038/srep40721.
PMID: 28079176BACKGROUNDElkassabany NM, Antosh S, Ahmed M, Nelson C, Israelite C, Badiola I, Cai LF, Williams R, Hughes C, Mariano ER, Liu J. The Risk of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Femoral Nerve Block Versus an Adductor Canal Block: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study. Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1696-703. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001237.
PMID: 27007076BACKGROUNDAndersen LO, Gaarn-Larsen L, Kristensen BB, Husted H, Otte KS, Kehlet H. Subacute pain and function after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2009 May;64(5):508-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05831.x.
PMID: 19413820BACKGROUNDNicolino TI, Costantini J, Carbo L. Complementary Saphenous Nerve Block to Intra-Articular Analgesia Reduces Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S168-S172. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
PMID: 32253065BACKGROUNDKnecht S, Tamine L, Faure N, Tran P, Orban JC, Bronsard N, Gonzalez JF, Micicoi G. Effectiveness of adductor canal block combined with posterior capsular infiltration on pain and return to walking after total knee arthroplasty: comparative analysis with femoral and popliteal sciatic nerves blocks. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025 Sep;111(5):104082. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104082. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
PMID: 39645191BACKGROUNDBeswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 22;2(1):e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435. Print 2012.
PMID: 22357571BACKGROUNDGlare P, Aubrey KR, Myles PS. Transition from acute to chronic pain after surgery. Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1537-1546. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30352-6.
PMID: 30983589BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antoine Sanchez, MD
Hôpital privé Dijon Bourgogne
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2026
First Posted
June 5, 2026
Study Start
May 25, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 25, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 25, 2027
Last Updated
June 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Beginning 6 months and ending 36 months after publication of the main results
- Access Criteria
- Requests should be addressed to the corresponding author and will be reviewed by the sponsor; data will be shared with researchers providing a methodologically sound proposal, after signature of a data access agreement and in compliance with GDPR.
De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the published article will be made available, together with the study protocol and statistical analysis plan, after publication of the main results. Data sharing will be subject to sponsor approval, a methodologically sound proposal, signature of a data access agreement, and compliance with GDPR.