Clinical Validation of AI-Based Quantitative Eye Movement Analysis From Smartphone 9-Gaze Videos (Glandy EOM)
GLANDY-EOM-VAL
Prospective Multicenter Observational Study for Clinical Validation of AI-Based Quantitative Eye Movement Analysis Using Smartphone-Recorded 9-Gaze Videos
1 other identifier
observational
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective, multicenter, multinational observational study evaluates the clinical validity of an AI-based quantitative eye movement analysis system (Glandy EOM) that analyzes smartphone-recorded 9-gaze videos. Approximately 200 adults per site with suspected or confirmed ocular motility abnormalities will undergo a single study visit consisting of a standard clinical 9-gaze examination, an assistant-aided smartphone video recording, and a patient self-recorded video acquisition using a mobile application. Because the study population is defined by clinical suspicion or diagnosis of ocular motility abnormality rather than confirmed disease at enrollment, some participants may be clinically judged to have no abnormality on formal evaluation; such subjects remain part of the study population and are not considered healthy volunteers. AI-derived quantitative eye movement metrics (corneal center displacement in millimeters and angular deviation) will be compared with rater-derived measurements obtained from the same videos using a calibrated reference approach, and with clinician-assessed 9-gaze grading. The investigational device is used solely for video acquisition and analysis and does not influence clinical decision-making.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
June 3, 2026
April 1, 2026
12 months
April 18, 2026
May 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Agreement between AI-derived and rater-derived corneal center displacement (distance, mm)
Agreement between AI-derived and rater-derived measurements of corneal center displacement expressed as distance (mm) across 9 gaze positions, assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.
At study visit (single visit)
Agreement between AI-derived and rater-derived angular deviation (degrees)
Agreement between AI-derived and rater-derived measurements of corneal center displacement expressed as angular deviation (degrees) across 9 gaze positions, assessed by ICC and Bland-Altman analysis.
At study visit (single visit)
Linear association and absolute error vs. rater-derived reference
Linear association and absolute error between AI-derived and rater-derived measurements (both distance and angular deviation), assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient and mean absolute error (MAE), respectively.
At study visit (single visit)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Correlation between AI-derived metrics (assistant-aided recording) and clinician-assessed 9-gaze grading
At study visit (single visit)
Correlation between AI-derived metrics (patient self-recorded) and clinician-assessed 9-gaze grading
At study visit (single visit)
Agreement between AI-derived metrics from patient self-recorded vs. assistant-aided recordings
At study visit (single visit)
Linear association and absolute error: patient self-recorded vs. assistant-aided
At study visit (single visit)
Study Arms (1)
Ocular motility abnormality cohort (single cohort)
Adults with suspected or confirmed ocular motility abnormalities scheduled for clinical 9-gaze examination at participating ophthalmology sites. No separate healthy-volunteer control cohort is enrolled; some participants may ultimately be clinically judged to have no abnormality on formal evaluation but remain part of the study population.
Interventions
Glandy EOM is an investigational software-only medical device developed by THYROSCOPE INC. It has not yet received regulatory approval and is used for research purposes only in this study. Glandy EOM processes smartphone-recorded 9-gaze facial videos to generate AI-derived quantitative eye movement metrics: * Corneal center displacement (mm) * Angular deviation (degrees) Video acquisition in this study includes (a) an assistant-aided recording using a standardized smartphone setup in the clinical environment and (b) a patient self-recorded video acquired through the study mobile application. A calibration marker of known size placed on the glabella is used for rater-derived reference measurements only and is NOT used by the AI algorithm. AI outputs are generated for research analysis and are NOT used to guide real-time clinical decisions during the study.
Eligibility Criteria
Adults of legal age of consent with suspected or confirmed ocular motility abnormalities, recruited at participating ophthalmology sites. Some enrolled participants may ultimately be clinically judged to have no abnormality on formal evaluation; these subjects remain part of the study population and are not considered healthy volunteers.
You may qualify if:
- Adults who have reached the legal age of consent for research participation in the applicable jurisdiction.
- Subjects with suspected or known ocular motility abnormalities.
- Subjects who are able to understand and follow gaze instructions required for the 9-gaze examination, as judged by the investigator.
- Subjects who are able to undergo facial video recording using a smartphone.
- Subjects who provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Conditions that prevent reliable detection of ocular landmarks in video recordings (e.g., severe ptosis, corneal opacity, or significant occlusion of the eyes).
- Ocular or facial conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, may significantly interfere with image-based analysis.
- Subjects who are unable to comply with study procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- THYROSCOPE INC.lead
Study Sites (1)
3003 North First Street #221
San Jose, California, 95134, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2026
First Posted
June 3, 2026
Study Start
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
June 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The dataset includes patient-captured smartphone 9-gaze facial videos, which are inherently identifiable biometric data and carry a higher re-identification risk than static images. Public sharing of individual participant data (IPD) would therefore pose a substantial privacy risk that cannot be fully mitigated by standard de-identification of tabular variables alone. The informed consent obtained from participants and the IRB/EC-approved protocol do not authorize broad third-party sharing of these video recordings or associated individual-level records. As this is a multinational, multicenter study, the collected data are also subject to the personal data protection laws applicable in each participating jurisdiction, including the Republic of Korea's Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA), the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and the US HIPAA where applicable, which restrict external transfer of identifiable health and biometric information. In addition, the investiga