Active vs. Passive VR During Office-based ENT Procedures
Active vs. Passive Virtual Reality for Reducing Pain and Anxiety During Office-based ENT Procedures
1 other identifier
interventional
132
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research is to evaluate whether active virtual reality reduces pain and anxiety more effectively than passive virtual reality during office-based ENT procedures. The main procedures include exposure to virtual reality (passive calming scenery or interactive puzzle game) via Paperplane Therapeutics software with VR headset or glasses during common in-office ENT procedures, participant self-report surveys (GAD-7, PHQ-9, PEG, VAS, SUDS, Likert, experience questions), and physician post-procedure survey. The study will enroll individuals 18 years or older who are scheduled to undergo common office-based ENT procedures (turbinate reduction, nasal debridement, balloon sinuplasty, radiofrequency ablation, nasal polypectomy, eustachian tube dilation, vocal fold injection, or subglottic steroid injection) at Cedars Sinai.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain
Started Jun 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
May 20, 2026
May 1, 2026
1 year
May 14, 2026
May 14, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain assessed with visual analog scale
Pain assessed on VAS (visual analog scale of 0-100 mm)
Immediately before and immediately after the office-based ENT procedure during a single study visit
Anxiety assessed with subjective units of distress scale
Anxiety assessed using Subjective Units of Distress scale (0-100)
Immediately before and immediately after the office-based ENT procedure during a single study visit
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clinician experience with VR use
Immediately after the office-based ENT procedure during a single study visit
Other Outcomes (1)
Patient satisfaction with VR use
Immediately after the office-based ENT procedure during a single study visit
Study Arms (2)
Passive virtual reality
EXPERIMENTALpassively watching calming scenery
Active virtual reality
EXPERIMENTALinteractive game
Interventions
Exposure to virtual reality via Paperplane Therapeutics software with VR headset or glasses during common in-office ENT procedures
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals 18 years old and older are included
- Individuals undergoing the following common office-based ENT procedures: turbinate reduction, nasal debridement, balloon sinuplasty, radiofrequency ablation (Rhineaer/Vivaer), nasal polypectomy, eustachian tube dilation, vocal fold injection, or subglottic steroid injection
- Able to consent
- English speaking
You may not qualify if:
- History of neurologic or seizure disorder, developmental delay, uncorrected visual impairment, motion sickness, vertigo, or inability to use a handheld controller
- Any records flagged "break the glass" or "research opt out."
- History of neurologic or seizure disorder, developmental delay, uncorrected visual impairment, motion sickness, or vertigo
- Any records flagged "break the glass" or "research opt out."
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cedars Sinai Medical Offices East Tower
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Related Publications (10)
Tyler MA, Lam K, Ashoori F, Cai C, Kain JJ, Fakhri S, Citardi MJ, Cattano D, Luong A. Analgesic Effects of Intravenous Acetaminophen vs Placebo for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Aug 1;143(8):788-794. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0238.
PMID: 28542675BACKGROUNDChang J, Ninan S, Liu K, Iloreta AM, Kirke D, Courey M. Enhancing Patient Experience in Office-Based Laryngology Procedures With Passive Virtual Reality. OTO Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1):2473974X20975020. doi: 10.1177/2473974X20975020. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
PMID: 33474521BACKGROUNDGray ML, Goldrich DY, McKee S, Schaberg M, Del Signore A, Govindaraj S, Iloreta AM. Virtual Reality as Distraction Analgesia for Office-Based Procedures: A Randomized Crossover-Controlled Trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Mar;164(3):580-588. doi: 10.1177/0194599820942215. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
PMID: 32746734BACKGROUNDPandrangi VC, Shah SN, Bruening JD, Wax MK, Clayburgh D, Andersen PE, Li RJ. Effect of Virtual Reality on Pain Management and Opioid Use Among Hospitalized Patients After Head and Neck Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug 1;148(8):724-730. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.1121.
PMID: 35679057BACKGROUNDMoreau S, Therond A, Cerda IH, Studer K, Pan A, Tharpe J, Crowther JE, Abd-Elsayed A, Gilligan C, Tolba R, Ashina S, Schatman ME, Kaye AD, Yong RJ, Robinson CL. Virtual Reality in Acute and Chronic Pain Medicine: An Updated Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Sep;28(9):893-928. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01246-2. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
PMID: 38587725BACKGROUNDLiu KY, Ninan SJ, Laitman BM, Goldrich DY, Iloreta AM, Londino AV 3rd. Virtual Reality as Distraction Analgesia and Anxiolysis for Pediatric Otolaryngology Procedures. Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):E1714-E1721. doi: 10.1002/lary.29148. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
PMID: 33017065BACKGROUNDGerceker GO, Salmal N, Bektas I. The effect of active and passive virtual reality distractions on phlebotomy-related emotional behavior, pain, anxiety, and fear in children: A randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Nurs. 2025 Jul-Aug;83:190-198. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2025.05.005. Epub 2025 May 12.
PMID: 40359712BACKGROUNDXiang H, Shen J, Wheeler KK, Patterson J, Lever K, Armstrong M, Shi J, Thakkar RK, Groner JI, Noffsinger D, Giles SA, Fabia RB. Efficacy of Smartphone Active and Passive Virtual Reality Distraction vs Standard Care on Burn Pain Among Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112082. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12082.
PMID: 34152420BACKGROUNDBani Mohammad E, Ahmad M. Virtual reality as a distraction technique for pain and anxiety among patients with breast cancer: A randomized control trial. Palliat Support Care. 2019 Feb;17(1):29-34. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000639. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
PMID: 30198451BACKGROUNDShetty V, Suresh LR, Hegde AM. Effect of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain and Anxiety During Dental Treatment in 5 to 8 Year Old Children. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;43(2):97-102. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-43.2.5. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
PMID: 30730798BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician ENT
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2026
First Posted
May 20, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share