Technology-Based Distractions for Minor Procedures
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if non-invasive distracting devices (Virtual Reality headset, Augmented Reality Headset) are more effective than the standard of care (i.e., no technology-based distraction) for decreasing anxiety and pain scores in pediatric patients undergoing various minor procedures (i.e lumbar punctures and cardiac catheterization). The anticipated primary outcome will be a reduction of overall cumulative medication and secondary outcomes include but are not limited to: physician satisfaction, discharge time, pain scores, anxiety scores, and procedure time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable anxiety
Started May 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2027
March 23, 2026
March 1, 2026
12 months
April 4, 2025
March 19, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the effectiveness of technological interventions on anxiety levels in patients who undergo minor procedures
Participants will complete the Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A), a self-report scale to measure anxiety levels before and after the technological intervention. The scale is a horizontal line from 0 to 10 with an anchor at 0 indicating "no anxiety" and an anchor at 10 indicating "worst possible anxiety".
baseline, immediately after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Evaluate the effectiveness of technological interventions on pain levels in patients whose age is 4-11 years old and undergo minor procedures
baseline, immediately after the intervention
To evaluate pain levels pre- and post-intervention, participants will complete the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) for patients 12-17 years old.
baseline, immediately after the intervention
To evaluate patient's, clinician's, and caregiver's satisfaction levels
immediately after the intervention
To evaluate the patient's affect during the intervention using HRAD
during minor procedure
To evaluate the patient's cooperation during the intervention using the modified Induction Compliance Checklist (mICC)
during minor procedure
Study Arms (2)
Standard of Care group
ACTIVE COMPARATORNo immersive technology will be assigned to the participant. Participant will use their own distraction method.
Immersive Technology grorup
EXPERIMENTALImmersive technologies including VR headsets, a bluetooth haptic device (Buddy Guard), a screen and projector (BERT), and a tablets with a game will be randomly assigned to the participants. Each participant will receive one technological intervention.
Interventions
Participant is allowed to use what they will use as a distraction tool while they are receiving treatment.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following four groups; VR headsets, a bluetooth haptic device (Buddy Guard), a screen and projector (BERT), and a tablets with a game. Participant's anxiety will be assessed and pre- and post-intervention assessments will be completed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pediatric patient age between 4-17
- English speaking
- Parental consent/patient assent
- Undergoing minor procedure(s) at LPCH or Stanford Hospital
You may not qualify if:
- Patient does not consent
- Legal guardian not present to obtain consent
- Patient with a significant neurological condition or major developmental disability
- Patient experiencing nausea
- Patient with active infection of the face or hand
- A history of severe motion sickness
- A history of visual problems
- A history of seizures caused by flashing light
- Major surgery within the last 48 hours
- Patients who are clinically unstable or require urgent/emergent intervention
- Patient or parental preference for general anesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2025
First Posted
April 11, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Last Updated
March 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03