Long-Term Engagement and Motivation Through Innovative Strategies in Adapted Physical Activity
IMPULSION
IMPULSION: Long-Term Engagement and Motivation Through Innovative Strategies in Adapted Physical Activity
1 other identifier
interventional
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aging is associated with progressive declines in physical, functional, and psychosocial capacities, leading to reduced autonomy, increased risk of falls, chronic diseases, and decreased quality of life. Physical inactivity is a major aggravating factor, despite strong evidence that regular physical activity helps prevent age-related decline. Adapted Physical Activity (APA) has demonstrated beneficial effects on physical function, mental health, pain, and healthcare utilization. However, long-term adherence to APA programs among older adults remains low, with fewer than 20% meeting World Health Organization recommendations. Therefore, innovative strategies are needed to improve sustained engagement in physical activity. This multicenter, randomized, single-blind interventional study aims to compare the effectiveness of different APA strategies on long-term engagement in physical activity among adults aged 60 years and older. A total of 600 participants will be randomized into four groups combining two key factors: (1) autonomy-based vs. non-autonomy-based approaches, and (2) classical APA vs. TEMPA-based APA programs. Each intervention consists of a 12-week program including 24 supervised sessions, with some groups incorporating a progressive transition toward autonomous practice. The primary outcome is long-term physical activity engagement assessed using the QAPPA questionnaire at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes include: Objective and self-reported physical activity levels (questionnaires and wearable devices) Functional capacities (muscle strength, endurance, gait speed, balance, cardiorespiratory fitness) Motivational and perceptual factors (e.g., enjoyment, fatigue, perceived effort, motivation) Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) Biological markers (inflammatory, metabolic, metabolomic, and epigenetic profiles) to identify predictors of adherence and physiological response Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) Statistical analyses will be conducted using mixed linear models for repeated measures to evaluate time, group, and interaction effects. Additional analyses will include descriptive statistics, group comparisons, longitudinal trends, and economic evaluations. This study aims to identify effective and sustainable APA strategies to improve long-term physical activity engagement and inform public health policies for older adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 19, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2031
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2031
May 19, 2026
May 1, 2026
5 years
May 5, 2026
May 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
effectiveness of different Adapted Physical Activity (APA) programs
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different Adapted Physical Activity (APA) programs on long-term engagement in physical activity among older adults. Long-term engagement will be assessed through the level of physical activity, measured using the QAPPA questionnaire The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Adults (QAPPA) is a tool for measuring the physical activity of people aged 60 and over. It was developed to meet the objective of assessing the level of physical activity of older adults, taking into account their age and health.
at 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Analyze functional outcomes: strength
at 3 months, and 6 months and 12 months
perceptual and motivational factors of engagement
at base line and at 3 months
perceptual and motivational factors of engagement
at base line and at 3 months
perceptual and motivational factors of engagement
at baseline and at 3 months
Analyze functional outcomes: Muscular endurance
at 3 months, and 6 months and 12 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
group A
EXPERIMENTALautonomy arm and classical practice
group B
EXPERIMENTALautonomy arm and TEMPA practice
group C
EXPERIMENTALnon-autonomy arm and classical practice
group D
EXPERIMENTALnon-autonomy arm and TEMPA practice
Interventions
All participants in Group A will receive a total of 24 Adapted Physical Activity (APA) sessions delivered by a qualified APA professional over a 15-week period. Two sessions per week will be provided during the first 9 weeks. From week 10 to week 15, only one supervised in-person session per week will be offered, and participants will be asked to complete the second session independently. This transition in session planning is expected to promote more sustainable long-term engagement in physical activity, Each session will consist of a warm-up (approximately 10-15 minutes), a main exercise phase (including endurance, strength, balance, flexibility, and coordination exercises), and a cool-down period. The structure of the sessions will be consistent and will comply with physical activity prescription guidelines for older adults
In Group B, sessions will more explicitly incorporate effort minimization strategies (TEMPA), which will be clearly communicated to participants. These strategies include encouraging focus on perceived enjoyment during exercise, allowing participants to choose music, involving participants in leading warm-ups, integrating game-based activities (e.g., dodgeball-type games), strengthening group cohesion and sense of affiliation, and providing individualized feedback on performance during sessions. To ensure proper implementation, the instructor will receive specific training in the TEMPA theoretical model and its associated adaptations. The instructor will also be required to explicitly communicate the strategies used during sessions. A report documenting the strategies implemented will be completed by the instructor after each session
All participants in Group C will receive a total of 24 Adapted Physical Activity (APA) sessions delivered by a qualified APA professional over a 12-week period. Participants will attend two APA sessions per week.
In Group D, sessions will more explicitly incorporate effort minimization strategies (TEMPA), which will be clearly communicated to participants. These strategies include encouraging participants to focus on perceived enjoyment during exercise, allowing them to choose music, involving them in leading the warm-up, integrating game-based activities (e.g., dodgeball-type games), strengthening group cohesion and sense of affiliation, and providing individualized feedback on performance during sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 60 or older
- Affiliation with, or beneficiary of, a social security system
- No objection to the study
You may not qualify if:
- Neurocognitive disorder preventing the provision of informed consent (MOCA \<18)
- Individuals under legal protection
- Individuals deprived of liberty
- Presence of a physical or cognitive condition preventing participation in the adapted physical activity protocol over 3 months:
- Neurocognitive disorder (MOCA \<18)
- Neurodegenerative disease with severe symptoms preventing participation in the protocol
- Neuromuscular disease with severe symptoms preventing participation in the protocol
- Severe sensory impairments (blindness or profound deafness)
- Amputation of one or more limbs
- Non-independent mobility
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de Nice - Hopital de Cimiez
Nice, France
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2026
First Posted
May 19, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2031
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2031
Last Updated
May 19, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05