Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Action Observation for Healthy Aging
PRIN2022
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aging is associated with a decline in muscle strength and the functionality of the perceptual structures involved in proprioception. This decline results in a gradual loss of autonomy in daily activities. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been shown to be an effective technique in limiting the decline in strength. Action observation (AO) is a cognitive technique, which has been shown to improve motor performance, especially when combined with peripheral stimulation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a self-administered, home-based intervention combining NMES and AO improves upper limb muscle strength and proprioceptive abilities in healthy elderly individuals. Participants within the age range of 65-85 years will be recruited for this study. The intervention is scheduled to span a duration of four weeks, encompassing three treatment sessions per week. Participants will be randomly divided into three groups: NMES, AO, and AO-NMES. Assessments will be performed before and immediately after the intervention. They will include muscle strength evaluation (handgrip strength, maximal isometric force of the biceps, bench press power), and perceptual evaluation (weight discrimination during an AO task, weight judgment tasks). This study may suggest an original approach, cost-effective approach to mitigate the effects of physiological aging on muscle and sensorimotor function, with potential applications for frail populations, unable or unmotivated to perform conventional physical activity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedDecember 22, 2025
December 1, 2025
4 months
December 3, 2025
December 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Estimated maximal power
Power expressed while performing a bench press exercise. This will be evaluated during the "Strength and power assessment "
Assessments will be conducted at two time points: (1) baseline (PRE), prior to the start of the intervention, and (2) post-intervention (POST), immediately after completion of the 4-week intervention period
Maximal isometric strength
Maximal isometric strength expressed during a isometric curl with the upper limbs. This will be evaluated during "Strength and power assessment "
Assessments will be conducted at two time points: (1) baseline (PRE), prior to the start of the intervention, and (2) post-intervention (POST), immediately after completion of the 4-week intervention period
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Error in the estimation of box weigth
Assessments will be conducted at two time points: (1) baseline (PRE), prior to the start of the intervention, and (2) post-intervention (POST), immediately after completion of the 4-week intervention period
Just noticeble difference (JND)
Assessments will be conducted at two time points: (1) baseline (PRE), prior to the start of the intervention, and (2) post-intervention (POST), immediately after completion of the 4-week intervention period
Study Arms (3)
Action Observation - Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALDuring the warm-up phase, the NMES will be set with a frequency of 50 Hz and a pulse duration at 400 μs and the intensity at motor threshold. Meanwhile participants will observe video showing movements of activity of daily living. At the end of the warm-up phase, the exercise phase will be administered at functional threshold (the minimum intensity required for a complete arm flexion or at maximal tolerated intensity (f=100Hz, t=400 μs).
Action Observation
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring the warm-up phase, the NMES will be set with a frequency of 50 Hz and a pulse duration at 400 μs and the intensity at motor threshold. Meanwhile participants will observe video showing movements of activity of daily living. At the end of the warm-up phase, participants will receive a NMES sham treatment (f=5Hz, t=100 μs) delivered at sensory threshold, known to be ineffective in increasing muscle strength.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring the warm-up phase, the NMES will be set with a frequency of 50 Hz and a pulse duration at 400 μs and the intensity at motor threshold. Meanwhile participants will observe video showing different landscapes. At the end of the warm-up phase, the exercise phase will be administered at functional threshold (the minimum intensity required for a complete arm flexion or at maximal tolerated intensity (f=100Hz, t=400 μs).
Interventions
During the warm-up phase, the NMES will be set with a frequency of 50 Hz and a pulse duration at 400 μs and the intensity at motor threshold. Meanwhile participants will observe video showing movements of activity of daily living. At the end of the warm-up phase, the exercise phase will be administered at functional threshold (the minimum intensity required for a complete arm flexion or at maximal tolerated intensity (f=100Hz, t=400 μs).
During the warm-up phase, the NMES will be set with a frequency of 50 Hz and a pulse duration at 400 μs and the intensity at motor threshold. Meanwhile participants will observe video showing movements of activity of daily living. At the end of the warm-up phase, participants will receive a NMES sham treatment (f=5Hz, t=100 μs) delivered at sensory threshold, known to be ineffective in increasing muscle strength.
During the warm-up phase, the NMES will be set with a frequency of 50 Hz and a pulse duration at 400 μs and the intensity at motor threshold. Meanwhile participants will observe video showing different landscapes. At the end of the warm-up phase, the exercise phase will be administered at functional threshold (the minimum intensity required for a complete arm flexion or at maximal tolerated intensity (f=100Hz, t=400 μs).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- sedenteary peole
You may not qualify if:
- neurological or psychiatric disorders
- fractures within the past six months
- orthopedic or musculoskeletal impairments
- uncontrolled hypertension
- regular resistance training (at least once per week)
- participation in competitive sports
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ambra Bisiolead
- Universita degli Studi di Genovacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Genova
Genoa, Liguria, 16132, Italy
Related Publications (13)
Albergoni A, Biggio M, Faelli E, Pesce A, Ruggeri P, Avanzino L, Bove M, Bisio A. Sensorimotor expertise influences perceptual weight judgments during observation of a sport-specific gesture. Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jun 22;5:1148812. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1148812. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37426895BACKGROUNDAlbergoni A, Biggio M, Faelli E, Ruggeri P, Avanzino L, Bove M, Bisio A. Aging deteriorates the ability to discriminate the weight of an object during an action observation task. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Aug 7;15:1216304. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1216304. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37609031BACKGROUNDAlcazar J, Guadalupe-Grau A, Garcia-Garcia FJ, Ara I, Alegre LM. Skeletal Muscle Power Measurement in Older People: A Systematic Review of Testing Protocols and Adverse Events. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;73(7):914-924. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx216.
PMID: 29309534BACKGROUNDAlcazar J, Rodriguez-Lopez C, Ara I, Alfaro-Acha A, Manas-Bote A, Guadalupe-Grau A, Garcia-Garcia FJ, Alegre LM. The Force-Velocity Relationship in Older People: Reliability and Validity of a Systematic Procedure. Int J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;38(14):1097-1104. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119880. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
PMID: 29126339BACKGROUNDIglesias-Soler E, Mayo X, Rial-Vazquez J, Morin-Jimenez A, Aracama A, Guerrero-Moreno JM, Jaric S. Reliability of force-velocity parameters obtained from linear and curvilinear regressions for the bench press and squat exercises. J Sports Sci. 2019 Nov;37(22):2596-2603. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1648993. Epub 2019 Jul 28.
PMID: 31354059BACKGROUNDInsausti-Delgado A, Lopez-Larraz E, Omedes J, Ramos-Murguialday A. Intensity and Dose of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Influence Sensorimotor Cortical Excitability. Front Neurosci. 2021 Jan 15;14:593360. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.593360. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33519355BACKGROUNDVivodtzev I, Debigare R, Gagnon P, Mainguy V, Saey D, Dube A, Pare ME, Belanger M, Maltais F. Functional and muscular effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with severe COPD: a randomized clinical trial. Chest. 2012 Mar;141(3):716-725. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0839. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
PMID: 22116795BACKGROUNDO'Connor D, Brennan L, Caulfield B. The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for managing the complications of ageing related to reduced exercise participation. Maturitas. 2018 Jul;113:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
PMID: 29903643BACKGROUNDMaffiuletti NA, Gondin J, Place N, Stevens-Lapsley J, Vivodtzev I, Minetto MA. Clinical Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Neuromuscular Rehabilitation: What Are We Overlooking? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Apr;99(4):806-812. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
PMID: 29233625BACKGROUNDLangeard A, Bigot L, Chastan N, Gauthier A. Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation training of the lower limb have functional effects on the elderly?: A systematic review. Exp Gerontol. 2017 May;91:88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.02.070. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
PMID: 28216413BACKGROUNDBisio A, Avanzino L, Biggio M, Ruggeri P, Bove M. Motor training and the combination of action observation and peripheral nerve stimulation reciprocally interfere with the plastic changes induced in primary motor cortex excitability. Neuroscience. 2017 Apr 21;348:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
PMID: 28214579BACKGROUNDBisio A, Avanzino L, Lagravinese G, Biggio M, Ruggeri P, Bove M. Spontaneous movement tempo can be influenced by combining action observation and somatosensory stimulation. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Aug 21;9:228. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00228. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26441565BACKGROUNDBisio A, Avanzino L, Gueugneau N, Pozzo T, Ruggeri P, Bove M. Observing and perceiving: A combined approach to induce plasticity in human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1212-1220. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.08.024. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
PMID: 25454343BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2025
First Posted
December 22, 2025
Study Start
November 2, 2025
Primary Completion
February 28, 2026
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The focus is not on individual responses, but rather on understanding the effects of the three types of intervention at the group level.