NCT07580781

Brief Summary

Sedation (painkillers and sedative drugs) treats pain, reduces suffering, and helps patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain comfortable. ECMO is a life support machine that provides oxygen and removes waste gases (carbon dioxide) in very sick patients with severe heart or lung failure. About 300-400 patients per year receive ECMO in the UK. These patients are younger and generally more healthy compared to other critically ill patients. However patients that survive ECMO have long-term health problems. These include anxiety, memory problems, withdrawal from medicines, and mobility issues. These problems issues could all be related to the type and amount of sedation given. A sedation protocol is a way of guiding healthcare professionals how much sedation is given to patients in ICU. Too much sedation can cause confusion, hallucinations, excessive sleepiness, and longer time in hospital. Too little sedation can cause pain, distress, and also a longer time in hospital. Using a sedation protocol in non-ECMO patients has been shown to reduce these complications. However, there are no protocols for giving sedation to ECMO patients in research papers. Investigators know healthcare staff find it difficult to manage sedation, and higher amounts of sedation is given to ECMO patients. Aims: To see whether it is possible to run a trial that compares using a sedation protocol against usual care. Design/methods: Thirty to 60 ECMO patients will be chosen and will be put into one of two groups. One group will receive usual care, and the other will receive care using the sedation protocol. The investigators will collect information from both groups to find out if the study design works and how many patients agree to take part. Patient and public involvement/engagement: The investigators received feedback from patients and family member participants which helped to design this proposal, the lay summary and what to measure in a trial. They will advise how the investigators should review study findings, and support sharing of results to the public. Impact/dissemination: The investigators will share findings through social media, patient charities, research papers and conferences.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
12mo left

Started Sep 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 23, 2026

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2026

Expected
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2027

Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2027

Last Updated

May 12, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

April 23, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

extracorporeal membrane oxygenationsedationopioidsedativeanalgosedationmechanical ventilationECMOICUIntensive Care UnitCritical Caresedation protocolanalgesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Feasibility of protocolised sedation

    Ability to; 1. Assess fidelity of intervention delivery (adherence to the study protocol) 2. Establish barriers and facilitators to trial conduct and intervention delivery 3. Assess the feasibility of data collection methods 4. Assess the acceptability of the co-designed analgosedation protocol from the perspectives of nursing, medical, and pharmacy staff using it.

    From date of randomisation to the end of treatment at 10 days, assessed up to 10 days

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Duration of mechanical ventilation

    Defined as date of randomisation until first successful unassisted breathing (no inspiratory support for 48hrs or ECMO) or death or hospital discharge (at recruiting site), assessed up to 30 days. Censor at hospital discharge in recruiting centre.

  • Occurrence and duration of delirium

    From date of randomisation to 10 days or death or transfer if occurs first, assessed up to 10 days.

  • Duration of ECMO treatment

    From date of randomisation to ECMO decannulation, assessed up 30 days.

  • Daily morphine equivalent doses

    From date of randomisation to 10 days or death/transfer if occurs first, assessed up to 10 days.

  • Daily midazolam equivalent doses

    From date of randomisation to 10 days or death/transfer if occurs first, assessed up to 10 days.

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention arm - use of sedation protocol

OTHER

The analgosedation protocol will focus on setting a daily target for pain using the CPOT score, and sedation using the RASS score. The protocol will include recommended opioid and sedative medicines and their dose ranges, guidance on titration of opioid and sedative doses based on pain and sedation scores, daily interruption of sedation, use of non-pharmacological approaches to keep patients calm and to promote sleep, and methods of weaning opioids and sedatives. Patients will also be assessed daily for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). All other treatments will be as per standard care and at the discretion of the treating clinical team. The sedation protocol will be used for up to 10 days after commencement of ECMO. One cluster (ICU) will be randomly assigned to this arm.

Other: Sedation protocol

Standard of care for delivery of analgosedation and all other medical treatment while in the ICU

NO INTERVENTION

Will comprise the standard of care for delivery of analgosedation and all other medical treatment while in the ICU. Standard of care includes use of pain (Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool - CPOT), and sedation (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale - RASS) scores to assess pain and sedation levels, and the use of opioids and sedatives to keep patients comfortable and pain-free with drug type and dosing selected by the ICU clinical team. One cluster (ICU) will be randomly assigned to this arm.

Interventions

Will comprise the use of the previously co-designed analgosedation protocol. The analgosedation protocol will focus on setting a daily target for pain using the CPOT score, and sedation using the RASS score. The protocol will include recommended opioid and sedative medicines and their dose ranges, guidance on titration of opioid and sedative doses based on pain and sedation scores, daily interruption of sedation, use of non-pharmacological approaches to keep patients calm and to promote sleep, and methods of weaning opioids and sedatives. Patients will also be assessed daily for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). All other treatments will be as per standard care and at the discretion of the treating clinical team. The sedation protocol will be used for up to 10 days after commencement of ECMO. One cluster (ICU) will be randomly assigned to this arm.

Also known as: Analgosedation protocol
Intervention arm - use of sedation protocol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 years and older
  • Receiving IV continuous infusions of analgosedation medication
  • Receiving ECMO treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (28)

  • Weijer C, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, McRae AD, White A, Brehaut JC, Taljaard M; Ottawa Ethics of Cluster Randomized Trials Consensus Group. The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001346. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

    PMID: 23185138BACKGROUND
  • Blackwood B, Tume LN, Morris KP, Clarke M, McDowell C, Hemming K, Peters MJ, McIlmurray L, Jordan J, Agus A, Murray M, Parslow R, Walsh TS, Macrae D, Easter C, Feltbower RG, McAuley DF; SANDWICH Collaborators. Effect of a Sedation and Ventilator Liberation Protocol vs Usual Care on Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Units: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Aug 3;326(5):401-410. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.10296.

    PMID: 34342620BACKGROUND
  • Blackwood B, Agus A, Boyle R, Clarke M, Hemming K, Jordan J, Macrae D, McAuley DF, McDowell C, McIlmurray L, Morris KP, Murray M, Parslow R, Peters MJ, Tume LN, Walsh T; Paediatric Intensive Care Society Study Group (PICS-SG). Sedation AND Weaning In Children (SANDWICH): protocol for a cluster randomised stepped wedge trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 10;9(11):e031630. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031630.

    PMID: 31712342BACKGROUND
  • Nix HP, Weijer C, Brehaut JC, Forster D, Goldstein CE, Taljaard M. Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: a guide for the perplexed. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 27;11(9):e054213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054213.

    PMID: 34580104BACKGROUND
  • Sim J, Dawson A. Informed consent and cluster-randomized trials. Am J Public Health. 2012 Mar;102(3):480-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300389. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

    PMID: 22390511BACKGROUND
  • Teare MD, Dimairo M, Shephard N, Hayman A, Whitehead A, Walters SJ. Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study. Trials. 2014 Jul 3;15:264. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-264.

    PMID: 24993581BACKGROUND
  • Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.

    PMID: 22530986BACKGROUND
  • Brook AD, Ahrens TS, Schaiff R, Prentice D, Sherman G, Shannon W, Kollef MH. Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 1999 Dec;27(12):2609-15. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199912000-00001.

    PMID: 10628598BACKGROUND
  • Mahmoud L, Zullo AR, Thompson BB, Wendell LC. Outcomes of protocolised analgesia and sedation in a neurocritical care unit. Brain Inj. 2018;32(7):941-947. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1469167. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

    PMID: 29708438BACKGROUND
  • Rose L, Fitzgerald E, Cook D, Kim S, Steinberg M, Devlin JW, Ashley BJ, Dodek P, Smith O, Poretta K, Lee Y, Burns K, Harvey J, Skrobik Y, Fergusson D, Meade M, Kraguljac A, Burry L, Mehta S; SLEAP Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Clinician perspectives on protocols designed to minimize sedation. J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

    PMID: 25466317BACKGROUND
  • Rose RL, Bucknall T. Staff perceptions on the use of a sedation protocol in the intensive care setting. Aust Crit Care. 2004 Nov;17(4):151-9. doi: 10.1016/s1036-7314(04)80020-1.

    PMID: 18038524BACKGROUND
  • Shehabi Y, Bellomo R, Kadiman S, Ti LK, Howe B, Reade MC, Khoo TM, Alias A, Wong YL, Mukhopadhyay A, McArthur C, Seppelt I, Webb SA, Green M, Bailey MJ; Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation (SPICE) Study Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Sedation Intensity in the First 48 Hours of Mechanical Ventilation and 180-Day Mortality: A Multinational Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):850-859. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003071.

    PMID: 29498938BACKGROUND
  • Stephens RJ, Dettmer MR, Roberts BW, Ablordeppey E, Fowler SA, Kollef MH, Fuller BM. Practice Patterns and Outcomes Associated With Early Sedation Depth in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):471-479. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002885.

    PMID: 29227367BACKGROUND
  • Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422002.

    PMID: 10816184BACKGROUND
  • Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.

    PMID: 30113379BACKGROUND
  • Tompkins DA, Campbell CM. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: clinically relevant or extraneous research phenomenon? Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011 Apr;15(2):129-36. doi: 10.1007/s11916-010-0171-1.

    PMID: 21225380BACKGROUND
  • Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, Speroff T, Gordon SM, Harrell FE Jr, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Dittus RS. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1753-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1753.

    PMID: 15082703BACKGROUND
  • Salluh JI, Soares M, Teles JM, Ceraso D, Raimondi N, Nava VS, Blasquez P, Ugarte S, Ibanez-Guzman C, Centeno JV, Laca M, Grecco G, Jimenez E, Arias-Rivera S, Duenas C, Rocha MG; Delirium Epidemiology in Critical Care Study Group. Delirium epidemiology in critical care (DECCA): an international study. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R210. doi: 10.1186/cc9333. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

    PMID: 21092264BACKGROUND
  • Remmington C, McKenzie C, Camporota L, Hanks F, Barker M, Sanderson B, Rose L. Analgosedation in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective UK cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Aug;131(2):e50-e52. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 Jun 19. No abstract available.

    PMID: 37344336BACKGROUND
  • Grap MJ, Munro CL, Wetzel PA, Best AM, Ketchum JM, Hamilton VA, Arief NY, Pickler R, Sessler CN. Sedation in adults receiving mechanical ventilation: physiological and comfort outcomes. Am J Crit Care. 2012 May;21(3):e53-63; quiz e64. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012301.

    PMID: 22549581BACKGROUND
  • Balzer F, Weiss B, Kumpf O, Treskatsch S, Spies C, Wernecke KD, Krannich A, Kastrup M. Early deep sedation is associated with decreased in-hospital and two-year follow-up survival. Crit Care. 2015 Apr 28;19(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0929-2.

    PMID: 25928417BACKGROUND
  • Kamdar BB, Combs MP, Colantuoni E, King LM, Niessen T, Neufeld KJ, Collop NA, Needham DM. The association of sleep quality, delirium, and sedation status with daily participation in physical therapy in the ICU. Crit Care. 2016 Aug 18;19:261. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1433-z.

    PMID: 27538536BACKGROUND
  • Dzierba AL, Abrams D, Brodie D. Medicating patients during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the evidence is building. Crit Care. 2017 Mar 21;21(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1644-y.

    PMID: 28320466BACKGROUND
  • Shekar K, Fraser JF, Smith MT, Roberts JA. Pharmacokinetic changes in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):741.e9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

    PMID: 22520488BACKGROUND
  • Marhong JD, DeBacker J, Viau-Lapointe J, Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Burry L, Fan E, Mehta S. Sedation and Mobilization During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Failure: An International Survey. Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;45(11):1893-1899. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002702.

    PMID: 28863011BACKGROUND
  • Dzierba AL, Abrams D, Madahar P, Muir J, Agerstrand C, Brodie D. Current practice and perceptions regarding pain, agitation and delirium management in patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Crit Care. 2019 Oct;53:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 29.

    PMID: 31202165BACKGROUND
  • deBacker J, Tamberg E, Munshi L, Burry L, Fan E, Mehta S. Sedation Practice in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Treated Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Study. ASAIO J. 2018 Jul/Aug;64(4):544-551. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000658.

    PMID: 29045280BACKGROUND
  • Brodie D, Bacchetta M. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for ARDS in adults. N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 17;365(20):1905-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct1103720.

    PMID: 22087681BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress SyndromeAgnosiaShock, Cardiogenic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration DisordersPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesInfarctionIschemiaPathologic ProcessesNecrosisShock

Study Officials

  • Louise Rose, PhD

    King's College London

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Christopher Remmington, MPharm

CONTACT

Louise Rose, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2026

First Posted

May 12, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Last Updated

May 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The King's Open Research Data System (KORDS) at King's College London will be used as a data repository, which will provide long-term storage and access for anonymised data and study protocol at project-end and to support publications. KORDS uses the Figshare data repository platform, providing a simple, self-deposit way for researchers to upload and share their data, and a publicly accessible showcase of datasets from King's research. It supports Open Research, enabling researchers to make datasets discoverable, accessible and citeable. All datasets have a DOI and a structured metadata record so that they can be shared and cited when re-used. Depositing meets the policy requirements of funders for data retention and sharing, and the requirements of many publishers for access to datasets supporting publications.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
The data will be made available following publication of research findings in peer-reviewed manuscripts and presentation at international conferences.
Access Criteria
Institution access will be needed to access any data. This includes permission to access the specific university and hospital servers. Potential users will require tools including Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Word to access and use the data, which are widely adopted in many institutions and sustainable. The data will be shared via the University repository KORDS but it will not be openly accessible. Requests for access to the data will be handled directly by the research team in line with local policies.
More information

Locations