Improving Sedation Practice in Critically Ill Adult Patients Using a Co-designed Sedation Protocol
ECMO-SED
Optimising Analgosedation in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Using a Co-designed Analgosedation Protocol
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sedation (painkillers and sedative drugs) treats pain, reduces suffering, and helps patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain comfortable. ECMO is a life support machine that provides oxygen and removes waste gases (carbon dioxide) in very sick patients with severe heart or lung failure. About 300-400 patients per year receive ECMO in the UK. These patients are younger and generally more healthy compared to other critically ill patients. However patients that survive ECMO have long-term health problems. These include anxiety, memory problems, withdrawal from medicines, and mobility issues. These problems issues could all be related to the type and amount of sedation given. A sedation protocol is a way of guiding healthcare professionals how much sedation is given to patients in ICU. Too much sedation can cause confusion, hallucinations, excessive sleepiness, and longer time in hospital. Too little sedation can cause pain, distress, and also a longer time in hospital. Using a sedation protocol in non-ECMO patients has been shown to reduce these complications. However, there are no protocols for giving sedation to ECMO patients in research papers. The investigators know healthcare staff find it difficult to manage sedation, and higher amounts of sedation is given to ECMO patients. Aims:
- To describe current sedation use in ECMO patients in the UK and compare to non-ECMO critically ill patients.
- To develop a sedation protocol for ECMO patients with input from patients, their family, and staff. Design/methods: Study 1: The investigators will study how sedation is used in adult ECMO patients and compare with non-ECMO but critically ill patients in the UK. The investigators will collect information on drug doses and pain and sedation scores. The investigators will also ask ECMO centres if they use a sedation protocol to adjust sedation doses. This information will be helpful for the design of the protocol in study 2. Study 2: The investigators will design a sedation protocol with input from patients, family, and staff. The investigators will organise meetings to share experiences and agree on what to include in the protocol that is considered acceptable and safe. The investigators will then assess if the protocol is safe and acceptable with staff outside the co-design group. Patient and public involvement/engagement: The investigators received feedback from patients and family members which helped to design this proposal, the lay summary and what to measure in a trial. Patients and family members will continue to help with development of the sedation and trial protocol. They will advise how the investigators should review study findings, and support sharing of results to the public. Impact/dissemination: The investigators will share findings through social media, patient charities, research papers and conferences.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2025
CompletedJune 24, 2025
May 1, 2025
2 months
June 9, 2025
June 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ICU mortality
Death whilst in ICU
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Other Outcomes (2)
ICU length of stay
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Delirium
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (4)
ECMO patients
Mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients who received ECMO organ support
Healthcare professionals
Doctors, nurses and pharmacists who look after ECMO patients
Non-ECMO
Mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients who did not receive ECMO organ support
ECMO survivors and family
ECMO survivors who have recovered and discharged from hospital. Family of ECMO survivors.
Interventions
This is not an intervention study
Eligibility Criteria
Stage 1: mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients Stage 2: Healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses and pharmacists) with experience caring for ECMO patients. ECMO survivors who have recovered and discharged from hospital, and their family.
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 years and older.
- Receiving continuous IV infusions of analgosedation (opioids, benzodiazepines, and/or propofol).
- Receiving ECMO for moderate to severe respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio \<20 kilopascals (kPa)) for ≤ 7 days during the week of recruitment.
You may not qualify if:
- Anticipated length of ICU stay in recruiting centre for less than 24 hours.
- Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the next 24 hours.
- Stage 2 (mixed methods study):
- Healthcare professionals working at one of two ECMO centres (St Thomas' Hospital and Royal Brompton Hospital (part of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust).
- ECMO survivors (patients admitted to ICU and survived ECMO organ support) who have returned home, and recovered.
- Family members of ECMO survivors, whose relative is no longer hospitalised.
- ECMO survivors currently receiving treatment in hospital.
- ECMO survivors with severe cognitive issues (issues with short-term memory and thinking).
- ECMO survivors who cannot communicate in English.
- Non-ECMO survivors and family members.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
Related Publications (18)
Rose L, Fitzgerald E, Cook D, Kim S, Steinberg M, Devlin JW, Ashley BJ, Dodek P, Smith O, Poretta K, Lee Y, Burns K, Harvey J, Skrobik Y, Fergusson D, Meade M, Kraguljac A, Burry L, Mehta S; SLEAP Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Clinician perspectives on protocols designed to minimize sedation. J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
PMID: 25466317BACKGROUNDRose RL, Bucknall T. Staff perceptions on the use of a sedation protocol in the intensive care setting. Aust Crit Care. 2004 Nov;17(4):151-9. doi: 10.1016/s1036-7314(04)80020-1.
PMID: 18038524BACKGROUNDShehabi Y, Bellomo R, Kadiman S, Ti LK, Howe B, Reade MC, Khoo TM, Alias A, Wong YL, Mukhopadhyay A, McArthur C, Seppelt I, Webb SA, Green M, Bailey MJ; Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation (SPICE) Study Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Sedation Intensity in the First 48 Hours of Mechanical Ventilation and 180-Day Mortality: A Multinational Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):850-859. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003071.
PMID: 29498938BACKGROUNDKress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422002.
PMID: 10816184BACKGROUNDDevlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
PMID: 30113379BACKGROUNDEly EW, Shintani A, Truman B, Speroff T, Gordon SM, Harrell FE Jr, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Dittus RS. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1753-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1753.
PMID: 15082703BACKGROUNDRemmington C, McKenzie C, Camporota L, Hanks F, Barker M, Sanderson B, Rose L. Analgosedation in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective UK cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Aug;131(2):e50-e52. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 Jun 19. No abstract available.
PMID: 37344336BACKGROUNDGrap MJ, Munro CL, Wetzel PA, Best AM, Ketchum JM, Hamilton VA, Arief NY, Pickler R, Sessler CN. Sedation in adults receiving mechanical ventilation: physiological and comfort outcomes. Am J Crit Care. 2012 May;21(3):e53-63; quiz e64. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012301.
PMID: 22549581BACKGROUNDBalzer F, Weiss B, Kumpf O, Treskatsch S, Spies C, Wernecke KD, Krannich A, Kastrup M. Early deep sedation is associated with decreased in-hospital and two-year follow-up survival. Crit Care. 2015 Apr 28;19(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0929-2.
PMID: 25928417BACKGROUNDKamdar BB, Combs MP, Colantuoni E, King LM, Niessen T, Neufeld KJ, Collop NA, Needham DM. The association of sleep quality, delirium, and sedation status with daily participation in physical therapy in the ICU. Crit Care. 2016 Aug 18;19:261. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1433-z.
PMID: 27538536BACKGROUNDDzierba AL, Abrams D, Brodie D. Medicating patients during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the evidence is building. Crit Care. 2017 Mar 21;21(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1644-y.
PMID: 28320466BACKGROUNDShekar K, Abdul-Aziz MH, Cheng V, Burrows F, Buscher H, Cho YJ, Corley A, Diehl A, Gilder E, Jakob SM, Kim HS, Levkovich BJ, Lim SY, McGuinness S, Parke R, Pellegrino V, Que YA, Reynolds C, Rudham S, Wallis SC, Welch SA, Zacharias D, Fraser JF, Roberts JA. Antimicrobial Exposures in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Mar 15;207(6):704-720. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202207-1393OC.
PMID: 36215036BACKGROUNDShekar K, Fraser JF, Smith MT, Roberts JA. Pharmacokinetic changes in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):741.e9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
PMID: 22520488BACKGROUNDKim M, Mahmood M, Estes LL, Wilson JW, Martin NJ, Marcus JE, Mittal A, O'Connell CR, Shah A. A narrative review on antimicrobial dosing in adult critically ill patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care. 2024 Oct 4;28(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05101-z.
PMID: 39367501BACKGROUNDMarhong JD, DeBacker J, Viau-Lapointe J, Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Burry L, Fan E, Mehta S. Sedation and Mobilization During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Failure: An International Survey. Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;45(11):1893-1899. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002702.
PMID: 28863011BACKGROUNDDzierba AL, Abrams D, Madahar P, Muir J, Agerstrand C, Brodie D. Current practice and perceptions regarding pain, agitation and delirium management in patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Crit Care. 2019 Oct;53:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 29.
PMID: 31202165BACKGROUNDdeBacker J, Tamberg E, Munshi L, Burry L, Fan E, Mehta S. Sedation Practice in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Treated Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Study. ASAIO J. 2018 Jul/Aug;64(4):544-551. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000658.
PMID: 29045280BACKGROUNDBrodie D, Bacchetta M. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for ARDS in adults. N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 17;365(20):1905-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct1103720.
PMID: 22087681BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Louise Rose, PhD
King's College London
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2025
First Posted
June 24, 2025
Study Start
June 30, 2025
Primary Completion
August 31, 2025
Study Completion
August 31, 2025
Last Updated
June 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- The data will be made available following publication of research findings in peer-reviewed manuscripts and presentation at international conferences.
- Access Criteria
- Institution access will be needed to access any data. This includes permission to access the specific university and hospital servers. Potential users will require tools including Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Word to access and use the data, which are widely adopted in many institutions and sustainable. The data will be shared via the University repository KORDS but it will not be openly accessible. Requests for access to the data will be handled directly by the research team in line with local policies.
The King's Open Research Data System (KORDS) at King's College London will be used as a data repository, which will provide long-term storage and access for anonymised data and study protocol at project-end and to support publications. KORDS uses the Figshare data repository platform, providing a simple, self-deposit way for researchers to upload and share their data, and a publicly accessible showcase of datasets from King's research. It supports Open Research, enabling researchers to make datasets discoverable, accessible and citeable. All datasets have a DOI and a structured metadata record so that they can be shared and cited when re-used. Depositing meets the policy requirements of funders for data retention and sharing, and the requirements of many publishers for access to datasets supporting publications.