NCT07573969

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the effect of adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine compared to ketamine in the caudal block on perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbosacral surgeries under general anesthesia.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
72

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
12mo left

Started May 2026

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress2%
May 2026May 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 25, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 7, 2026

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

April 25, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Caudal analgesiaAdult caudal blocksLumbosacral surgeriesCaudal ketamineCaudal dexmedetomidine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Duration of postoperative analgesia when VAS score ≥ 3.

    Duration of postoperative analgesia (the time from the end of giving the caudal analgesia to the first given dose of morphine) when VAS score ≥ 3.

    Immediately after giving the caudal block and up to 24 hours postoperatively.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The total dose of used morphine postoperatively/patient (rescue analgesia) for first 24 hours, PONV and hemodynamic effects.

    First 24 hours postoperative.

Study Arms (3)

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patients will receive 20ml plain bupivacaine (0.125%) in the caudal block

Drug: Group C (plain bupivacaine (0.125%))

Dexmedetomidine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patients will receive 20ml plain bupivacaine (0.125%) + 2μg/kg dexmedetomidine in the caudal block

Drug: Group D (plain bupivacaine (0.125%) + 2μg/kg dexmedetomidine)

Ketamine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patients will receive 20ml plain bupivacaine (0.125%) + 1mg/kg ketamine in the caudal block

Drug: Group K (plain bupivacaine (0.125%) + 1mg/kg ketamine)

Interventions

The patients will receive 20ml plain bupivacaine (0.125%) in the caudal block

Control

The patients will receive 20ml plain bupivacaine (0.125%) + 1mg/kg ketamine in the caudal block

Ketamine

The patients will receive 20ml plain bupivacaine (0.125%) + 2μg/kg dexmedetomidine in the caudal block

Dexmedetomidine

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 21-60 years.
  • Sex: Both sexes.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class-I and II.
  • Scheduled for lumbosacral surgery under General Anesthesia.

You may not qualify if:

  • Declining to give written informed consent or patients with significant cognitive dysfunction that hinders informed consent.
  • History of allergy to the medications used in the study.
  • Contraindications to regional anesthesia (including coagulopathy and local infection).
  • History of recent analgesic intake or abuse.
  • Pregnancy or lactating mothers.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ain Shams University hospitals

Cairo, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (19)

  • Goyal V, Kubre J, Radhakrishnan K. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in caudal analgesia in children. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):227-32. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.174468.

    PMID: 27212752BACKGROUND
  • Wiegele M, Marhofer P, Lonnqvist PA. Caudal epidural blocks in paediatric patients: a review and practical considerations. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):509-517. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.030. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

    PMID: 30857607BACKGROUND
  • Barham G, Hilton A. Caudal epidurals: the accuracy of blind needle placement and the value of a confirmatory epidurogram. Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep;19(9):1479-83. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1469-8. Epub 2010 May 29.

    PMID: 20512512BACKGROUND
  • Beyaz SG, Tokgoz O, Tufek A. Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases. Ann Saudi Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;31(5):494-7. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.84627.

    PMID: 21911987BACKGROUND
  • Mossetti V, Vicchio N, Ivani G. Local anesthetis and adjuvants in pediatric regional anesthesia. Curr Drug Targets. 2012 Jun;13(7):952-60. doi: 10.2174/138945012800675713.

    PMID: 22512395BACKGROUND
  • Bajwa SJ, Bajwa SK, Kaur J, Singh G, Arora V, Gupta S, Kulshrestha A, Singh A, Parmar S, Singh A, Goraya S. Dexmedetomidine and clonidine in epidural anaesthesia: A comparative evaluation. Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;55(2):116-21. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.79883.

    PMID: 21712865BACKGROUND
  • Solanki SL, Bharti N, Batra YK, Jain A, Kumar P, Nikhar SA. The analgesic effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine or clonidine, with bupivacaine, in trauma patients undergoing lower limb surgery: a randomised, double-blind study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013 Jan;41(1):51-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1304100110.

    PMID: 23362890BACKGROUND
  • Vetter TR, Carvallo D, Johnson JL, Mazurek MS, Presson RG Jr. A comparison of single-dose caudal clonidine, morphine, or hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing ureteral reimplantation. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jun;104(6):1356-63, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000261521.52562.de.

    PMID: 17513626BACKGROUND
  • Sekar C, Rajasekaran S, Kannan R, Reddy S, Shetty TA, Pithwa YK. Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in lumbosacral spine surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):261-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.11.009.

    PMID: 15125846BACKGROUND
  • Goyal V, Kubre J, Radhakrishnan K.: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in caudal analgesia in children. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):227-32.

    BACKGROUND
  • Wiegele M, Marhofer P, Lönnqvist PA.: Caudal epidural blocks in paediatric patients: a review and practical considerations. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):509-517.

    BACKGROUND
  • Mossetti V., Vicchio N., Ivani G.: Local anesthetics and adjuvants in pediatric regional anesthesia. Curr Drug Targets. 2012;13:952-960.

    BACKGROUND
  • Sabbar S, Zamir AK, Khan FA: Caudal ketamine with bupivacaine and bupivacaine alone for postoperative analgesia in paediatric inguino-scrotal surgeries. Med Channel. 2009; 4:207-210.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bajwa SJS, Bajwa SK: Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine in Epidural anaesthesia: A comparative evaluation. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011; 55:116-21.

    BACKGROUND
  • Solanki SL, Bharti N, Batra YK, et al.: The analgesic effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine or clonidine, with bupivacaine, in trauma patients undergoing lower limb surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013; 41(1):51-6.

    BACKGROUND
  • Vetter TR, Carvallo D, Johnson JL, et al.: A comparison of single-dose caudal clonidine, morphine, or hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing ureteral reimplantation. Anesth Analg. 2007; 104(6):1356-1363.

    BACKGROUND
  • Beyaz SG, Tokgoz O and Tufek A.: Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases. Ann Saudi Med. 2011; 31(5):494-497.

    BACKGROUND
  • Barham G and Hilton A.: the accuracy of blind needle placement and the value of a confirmatory epidurogram. EuropeanSpineJournal. 2010; 19(9):1479-1483.

    BACKGROUND
  • Sekar C, Rajasekaran S, Kannan R, et al.: Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in lumbosacral spine surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2004;4(3):261-264.

    BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

DexmedetomidineKetamine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsCyclohexanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Central Study Contacts

Salma Ayman Abdulazeem, MSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2026

First Posted

May 7, 2026

Study Start

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Locations