Impact of Optimized Pacing Strategies on Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients With Pacemaker
OPTPACE-HF
Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes of OPTimized PACing StratEgies in Heart Failure Patients With Pacing Indications: Randomized-Controlled Trial (OPTPACE-HF)
2 other identifiers
interventional
106
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the clinical impact of an optimized pacing strategy in patients with heart failure.
- Intervention: Adjustment of the pacemaker lower rate limit to an individualized, hemodynamically optimized heart rate.
- Primary Endpoint: Heart failure symptoms, assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score.
- Hypothesis: In patients with heart failure requiring permanent pacing, an optimized pacing strategy will lead to a significant improvement in heart failure symptoms (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score) at 12 months compared with the conventional pacing strategy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Dec 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable heart-failure
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2028
May 1, 2026
April 1, 2026
3 years
January 14, 2026
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Higher scores indicate better health status and a higher quality of life, score 0 to 100
From enrollment to 1year after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (21)
NTproBNP
From enrollment to 1year after the procedure
Functional status (NYHA class)
From enrollment to 1year after the procedure
Distance in 6-minute walk test
From enrollment to 1year after the procedure
Occurrence of atrial fibrillation
From enrollment to 1year after the procedure
Atrial fibrillation burden
From enrollment to 1year after the procedure
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Optimized pacing strategy
EXPERIMENTALOptimized Pacing Strategy * Definition of Optimal Heart Rate: After permanent pacemaker implantation, a hemodynamic evaluation will be performed using right heart catheterization with stepwise incremental pacing rates of 60, 70, 80, and 90 bpm. If the optimal heart rate is identified at one of these 10-bpm intervals, additional assessments will be conducted in 5-bpm increments around that rate to further refine the optimal pacing rate. * Invasive hemodynamic parameters assessed include: Mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, Cardiac output (thermodilution) * The optimal heart rate is defined as the pacing rate associated with the lowest mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure or highest cardiac output. * To ensure hemodynamic stabilization, a 5-minute washout period will be applied between rate changes. * To minimize the confounding effects of intrinsic bradycardia below 60 bpm, optimized pacing will be performed after a stabilization period of 2 weeks following permanent pacemaker.
Conventional pacing strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional Pacing Strategy • The conventional pacing group will have the pacemaker's lower rate limit set at a fixed 60 bpm, in accordance with current standard practice.
Interventions
Optimized Pacing Strategy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with symptomatic bradycardia who meet the indication for permanent pacemaker implantation and fulfill one of the following conditions:
- Sick sinus syndrome with or without impaired atrioventricular conduction
- Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response
- Chronotropic incompetence
- Patients diagnosed with heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% on transthoracic echocardiography with at least one of the following:
- H2FPEF score ≥ 6 or HFA-PEFF score ≥ 5
- N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ≥ 300 pg/mL (sinus rhythm) or ≥ 600 pg/mL (atrial fibrillation)
- Prior hospitalization for heart failure or documented use of loop diuretics for heart failure symptoms
You may not qualify if:
- Patients expected to have a ventricular pacing burden ≥ 20% without sufficient capture of cardiac physiologic pacing, which includes biventricular pacing, His bundle pacing, and left bundle branch area pacing.
- (Sufficient cardiac physiologic pacing is defined as a paced QRS duration ≤ 140 ms.)
- Patients not expected to achieve sufficient pacing dependency, defined as:
- In sinus rhythm: baseline atrial rate \> 60 bpm on Holter monitoring or inpatient ECG monitoring
- In atrial fibrillation/flutter: baseline ventricular rate \> 60 bpm on Holter monitoring or inpatient ECG monitoring
- Patients with contraindications to permanent pacemaker implantation
- Patients with moderate or greater valvular stenosis or regurgitation.
- Patients with dyspnea not attributable to heart failure, due to uncontrolled comorbid conditions
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Patients who have refused active treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
Related Publications (13)
Bozkurt B, Colvin M, Cook J, Cooper LT, Deswal A, Fonarow GC, Francis GS, Lenihan D, Lewis EF, McNamara DM, Pahl E, Vasan RS, Ramasubbu K, Rasmusson K, Towbin JA, Yancy C; American Heart Association Committee on Heart Failure and Transplantation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Current Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies for Specific Dilated Cardiomyopathies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016 Dec 6;134(23):e579-e646. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000455. Epub 2016 Nov 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 27832612RESULTvan Loon T, Rijks J, van Koll J, Wolffs J, Cornelussen R, van Osta N, Luermans J, Prinzen F, Linz D, van Empel V, Delhaas T, Vernooy K, Lumens J. Accelerated atrial pacing reduces left-heart filling pressure: a combined clinical-computational study. Eur Heart J. 2024 Dec 7;45(46):4953-4964. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae718.
PMID: 39589540RESULTInfeld M, Wahlberg K, Cicero J, et al. Effect of Personalized Accelerated Pacing on Quality of Life, Physical Activity, and Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Preclinical and Overt Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The myPACE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol 2023; 8(3): 213-21.
RESULTHernandez AF, Hammill BG, O'Connor CM, Schulman KA, Curtis LH, Fonarow GC. Clinical effectiveness of beta-blockers in heart failure: findings from the OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jan 13;53(2):184-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.031.
PMID: 19130987RESULTHunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation; Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation 2001; 104(24): 2996-3007.
RESULTGuidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26(5): 1376-98
RESULTWachter R, Schmidt-Schweda S, Westermann D, Post H, Edelmann F, Kasner M, Luers C, Steendijk P, Hasenfuss G, Tschope C, Pieske B. Blunted frequency-dependent upregulation of cardiac output is related to impaired relaxation in diastolic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2009 Dec;30(24):3027-36. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp341.
PMID: 19720638RESULTKotecha D, Flather MD, Altman DG, Holmes J, Rosano G, Wikstrand J, Packer M, Coats AJS, Manzano L, Bohm M, van Veldhuisen DJ, Andersson B, Wedel H, von Lueder TG, Rigby AS, Hjalmarson A, Kjekshus J, Cleland JGF; Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure Collaborative Group. Heart Rate and Rhythm and the Benefit of Beta-Blockers in Patients With Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 20;69(24):2885-2896. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 30.
PMID: 28467883RESULTNikolovska Vukadinovic A, Vukadinovic D, Borer J, Cowie M, Komajda M, Lainscak M, Swedberg K, Bohm M. Heart rate and its reduction in chronic heart failure and beyond. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Oct;19(10):1230-1241. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.902. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
PMID: 28627045RESULTBohm M, Swedberg K, Komajda M, Borer JS, Ford I, Dubost-Brama A, Lerebours G, Tavazzi L; SHIFT Investigators. Heart rate as a risk factor in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): the association between heart rate and outcomes in a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Sep 11;376(9744):886-94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61259-7.
PMID: 20801495RESULTWriting Committee Members; ACC/AHA Joint Committee Members. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2022 May;28(5):e1-e167. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
PMID: 35378257RESULTLee CJ, Lee H, Yoon M, Chun KH, Kong MG, Jung MH, Kim IC, Cho JY, Kang J, Park JJ, Kim HC, Choi DJ, Lee J, Kang SM. Heart Failure Statistics 2024 Update: A Report From the Korean Society of Heart Failure. Int J Heart Fail. 2024 Apr 18;6(2):56-69. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2024.0010. eCollection 2024 Apr.
PMID: 38694933RESULTMasarone D, Ammendola E, Rago A, Gravino R, Salerno G, Rubino M, Marrazzo T, Molino A, Calabro P, Pacileo G, Limongelli G. Management of Bradyarrhythmias in Heart Failure: A Tailored Approach. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1067:255-269. doi: 10.1007/5584_2017_136.
PMID: 29280096RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assitant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2026
First Posted
May 1, 2026
Study Start
December 18, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Last Updated
May 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share