Feasibility Study of Diaphragm Synchronized Pacing (DSP) Via the Left Inferior Phrenic Vein (LIPV) Approach
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) benefits a portion of patients, while more patients are not yet indicated to a therapy that mechanically helps the heart systole and/or diastole. Synchronized diaphragmatic pacing may be feasible to induce diaphragm local contraction and recoil that enhance pump function of the heart, thus improve cardiac function and QoL. This acute, interventional study is conducted in a single site, Renji Hospital, to evaluate the feasibility of diaphragm pacing and assess the beneficial effect of pacing-regulated diaphragm movement to the heart, with 10 cases of sample size and one-week follow-up after discharge.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Nov 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable heart-failure
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 28, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2026
CompletedFebruary 6, 2026
January 1, 2026
3 months
December 8, 2025
January 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The feasibility of local diaphragm muscle pacing
To evaluate the success rate of diaphragm pacing and the capability of the electrode to capture the local diaphragm below the cardiac apex, providing a recommendation of venous access and route for the interventional procedure to conduct local electrical stimulation in the diaphragm.
Acute, during the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The observation of pacing-regulated diaphragm movement for the determination of local diaphragm capture
Intra-procedure
The diameter (or dimension) of the local venous anatomy
Perioperative
DSP lead threshold
Intra-procedure
Complications of the diaphragmatic synchronized pacing
Perioperative
Study Arms (1)
DSP LIPV group
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
For patients with indications for CRT or CRT-D, a pacing electrode delivery sheath is inserted via the subclavian approach following the placement of the atrial electrode as part of the conventional pacemaker implantation procedure. Angiography is performed at the level of the LIPV to visualize its course. Subsequently, a quadripolar ventricular lead is advanced through the sheath into the LIPV to conduct diaphragmatic pacing testing, observing the diaphragmatic pacing effectiveness and its impact on cardiac activity. Upon test completion, the catheter and lead are withdrawn, and the standard pacemaker implantation procedure is continued.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged \>=18 yrs;
- Patients indicated for CRT or CRT-D , planned for LV lead implantation;
- Patients are willing to participate in the study and provide signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- CRT or CRT-D replacement
- Ischemic heart disease with CABG history
- Diaphragm dysfunction history
- Phrenic nerve injury
- IVC filter history
- Abdominal surgery history
- Splenomegaly
- Pulmonary disease
- Moderate or severe liver cirrhosis
- Severe hepatic or renal dysfunction
- Currently pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study period
- Patients participate in another study that will confound this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- RenJi Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Renji Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200127, China
Related Publications (7)
Dando L, Howick V JF, Yoo J, Kella DK, McLeod CJ, van Niekerk CJ. Left inferior phrenic vein ICD lead implantation. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2025 Mar 18;11(6):534-538. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2025.03.010. eCollection 2025 Jun. No abstract available.
PMID: 40557395BACKGROUNDMcIntosh RA, Ansari MI, Moon J, Khan HR. Delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy via the left inferior phrenic vein: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2019 Sep 16;3(3):ytz144. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytz144. eCollection 2019 Sep.
PMID: 31660505BACKGROUNDFujii Y, Koizumi J, Sekiguchi Y, Ono S, Sekiguchi T, Hara T, Hashimoto J. Morphometric assessment of the left inferior phrenic vein in patients with portal hypertension. Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 10;12(1):15275. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19610-w.
PMID: 36088466BACKGROUNDBeeler R, Schoenenberger AW, Bauer P, Kobza R, Bergner M, Mueller X, Schlaepfer R, Zuber M, Erne S, Erne P. Improvement of cardiac function with device-based diaphragmatic stimulation in chronic heart failure patients: the randomized, open-label, crossover Epiphrenic II Pilot Trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Mar;16(3):342-9. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.20. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
PMID: 24464736BACKGROUNDRoos M, Kobza R, Jamshidi P, Bauer P, Resink T, Schlaepfer R, Stulz P, Zuber M, Erne P. Improved cardiac performance through pacing-induced diaphragmatic stimulation: a novel electrophysiological approach in heart failure management? Europace. 2009 Feb;11(2):191-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun377.
PMID: 19168496BACKGROUNDSieniewicz BJ, Gould J, Porter B, Sidhu BS, Teall T, Webb J, Carr-White G, Rinaldi CA. Understanding non-response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy: common problems and potential solutions. Heart Fail Rev. 2019 Jan;24(1):41-54. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9734-8.
PMID: 30143910BACKGROUNDJorbendaze A, Young R, Shaburishvili T, Demyanchuk V, Buriak R, Todurov B, Rudenko K, Zuber M, Stampfli SF, Tanner FC, Erne P, Mirro M, Fudim M, Goldberg LR, Cleland JGF. Synchronized diaphragmatic stimulation for heart failure using the VisONE system: a first-in-patient study. ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;9(4):2207-2214. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13984. Epub 2022 May 26.
PMID: 35619238RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2025
First Posted
February 6, 2026
Study Start
November 28, 2025
Primary Completion
February 28, 2026
Study Completion
March 31, 2026
Last Updated
February 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01