NCT07557667

Brief Summary

Dual-task training combines movement with cognitive tasks to improve gait, balance, and thinking. This study will compare tele-supervised versus onsite dual-task balance training in older adults at risk of falls. Sixty participants aged 65+ will be randomly assigned to either remote or face-to-face training for 8 weeks. Both groups will follow the same program, delivered via video calls or direct supervision. Outcomes measures will include gait speed, balance, and cognition using the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B).

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
5mo left

Started Sep 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 20, 2026

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 29, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 10, 2026

Expected
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 10, 2027

1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 10, 2027

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

April 20, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Balance assessment

    The most well-known balance test for evaluating adult balance and fall risk is the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The 14 items on the BBS have an ordinal scale of 0 to 4, totaling 56 points; a lower score denotes a higher risk of falling. Minimal function is represented by a score of 0, and maximal function is represented by a score of 4. It takes about twenty minutes to finish. The items are evaluated from the static position with increasing difficulty by decreasing the base of support to dynamic activities (Joa, 2024). BBS is reliable and valid in older individuals (Berg et al., 1992; Şahin et al., 2008).

    8 weeks

  • Gait speed

    Gait speed will be measured using the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT). A 14-meter walkway will be used, and participants will be asked to walk at their typical pace. The time will be recorded throughout the middle 10 meters to account for acceleration and deceleration. Meters per second will be used to measure walking speed; greater numbers denote superior performance. For assessing functional mobility in older persons, the 10MWT is a viable and trustworthy tool (Önal \& Kocaman, 2025).

    8 weeks

  • Cognitive function

    The Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) assessed divided attention, executive function, cognitive flexibility, and visual attention. As fast as they can, participants will connect 25 circles that alternate between letters and numbers (1-A-2-B); shorter completion times indicate better performance. For older adults, TMT-B is valid and reliable (Tombaugh, 2004; Sánchez-Cubillo et al., 2009).

    8 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Tele-supervised dual-task training group

EXPERIMENTAL

The tele-supervised group will perform sessions at home through Zoom Video Communications. Each participant will receive an initial session to set up the device, camera position, lighting, and sound. Therapists will provide real-time supervision and feedback in both groups. Delivery will occur via video calls for the tele group and in person for the onsite group. Training will follow a fixed-priority strategy. Participants will divide attention equally between motor and cognitive tasks. Sessions will last 45 minutes. They will be conducted three times per week for eight weeks. Each session will include: 5 minutes warm-up, 35 minutes dual-task training, 5 minutes cool-down

Other: Dual-task balance training program, delivered either via real-time video conferencing

Onsite rehabilitation group

EXPERIMENTAL

The onsite group will receive the same dual-task balance training program, delivered face-to-face by a trained therapist at the physical therapy clinic, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, with a frequency and duration matched to the tele-supervised group.

Other: Face to face intervension

Interventions

The tele-supervised group will perform sessions at home through Zoom Video Communications. Training will follow a fixed-priority strategy. Sessions will last 45 minutes. Each session will include: 5 minutes warm-up, 35 minutes dual-task training, and 5 minutes cool-down.

Tele-supervised dual-task training group

The onsite group received the same dual-task balance training program, delivered face-to-face by a trained therapist at the physical therapy clinic, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, with a frequency and duration matched to the tele-supervised group.

Onsite rehabilitation group

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • sixty literate, community-dwelling older individuals (male and female) 65 years of age or older
  • access to the internet at home (for participants in the tele-supervised group)
  • fall risk defined as a Berg Balance Scale score ˂52 (out of a total of 56 points)
  • at least one fall during the preceding year
  • as well as the capacity to walk on one's own without the need for an assistive device.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants with neurological or musculoskeletal disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, orthopedic conditions)
  • or severe sensory impairments that could interfere with participation or balance were excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (5)

  • Park, J. H. (2022). Is dual-task training clinically beneficial to improve balance and executive function in community-dwelling older adults with a history of falls? International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(16), 10198.

    BACKGROUND
  • Mou, C., & Jiang, Y. (2025). Effect of dual task-based training on motor and cognitive function in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. BMC neurology, 25(1), 290.

    BACKGROUND
  • • Chandran, V., & Smitha, D. (2021). Comparison of Single Task and Dual Task Balance Training on the Quality of Life of Elderly with Balance Impairment. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy, 15(4).

    BACKGROUND
  • •Balcı, L. A., Soğukkanlı, K., Burcu, S., & Hanoğlu, L. (2022). Effects of single-task, dual-task and successive physical-cognitive training on fall risk and balance performance in older adults: a randomized trial. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation, 9(1), 1-11.

    BACKGROUND
  • • Falbo, S., Condello, G., Capranica, L., Forte, R., & Pesce, C. (2016). Effects of physical-cognitive dual task training on executive function and gait performance in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. BioMed Research International, 2016(1), 5812092.

    BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Nadia M Radwan, PHD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
DR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2026

First Posted

April 29, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

September 10, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 10, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 10, 2027

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04