NCT07556601

Brief Summary

Blastocyst vitrification is standard in assisted reproduction, but clinical data on ultra-rapid vitrification are limited. This pilot study evaluates the safety, feasibility, and preliminary clinical performance of an ultra-rapid blastocyst vitrification protocol compared with the standard approach.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
22mo left

Started May 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress1%
May 2026Mar 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 13, 2026

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 29, 2026

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2026

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2027

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2028

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Post-warming survival rate

    the proportion of vitrified blastocysts that remain morphologically viable after warming, expressed as a percentage of all warmed blastocysts.

    Immediately after warming (within the same laboratory session)

  • Clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (only first transfer will be considered).

    defined as the proportion of embryo transfers resulting in a clinical pregnancy, confirmed by the presence of an intrauterine gestational sac on ultrasound. Only the first embryo transfer per patient is included in the analysis.

    6-8 weeks after embryo transfer

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Blastocyst re-expansion

    Within 2 hours after warming

  • Post-warming blastocyst morphokinetic parameters

    From embryo warming until embryo transfer (within 2-6 hours post-warming)

  • Post-warming blastocyst morphological quality

    From embryo warming until embryo transfer (within 2-6 hours post-warming)

  • Technical or embryological adverse events.

    From blastocyst warming until embryo transfer, within the same clinical procedure (up to 6 hours post-warming)

Study Arms (2)

Standard Vitrification Protocol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The standard vitrification protocol corresponds to the routine clinical practice of the laboratory and consists of the following steps: 1. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 10-12 minutes at room temperature. 2. Vitrification solution exposure: Blastocysts are then transferred to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum exposure time of 90 seconds. 3. Loading: The blastocyst is loaded onto a Cryotop device (Kitazato). 4. Vitrification: The Cryotop is plunged directly into liquid nitrogen within 1 second of loading to ensure ultra-rapid cooling. 5. Capping: The Cryotop is immediately capped under liquid nitrogen conditions.

Other: Standard Vitrification

Ultra-Rapid Vitrification Protocol

EXPERIMENTAL

The ultra-rapid vitrification protocol is identical to the standard protocol in terms of media, devices, and laboratory conditions, with the following modifications: Preparation step - Blastocyst shrinkage: Prior to equilibration, artificial collapse of the blastocyst is performed using a single laser pulse to induce blastocoel shrinkage. The subsequent steps are: 1\. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 2-4 minutes. Vitrification solution exposure: Transfer to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum of 90 seconds. 3\. Loading: Loading of the blastocyst onto a Cryotop device. 4. Vitrification: Immediate plunging of the Cryotop into liquid nitrogen within 1 second. 5\. Capping: Immediate capping under liquid nitrogen.

Other: Ultra-Rapid Vitrification

Interventions

1. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 10-12 minutes at room temperature. 2. Vitrification solution exposure: Blastocysts are then transferred to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum exposure time of 90 seconds. 3. Loading: The blastocyst is loaded onto a Cryotop device (Kitazato). 4. Vitrification: The Cryotop is plunged directly into liquid nitrogen within 1 second of loading to ensure ultra-rapid cooling. 5. Capping: The Cryotop is immediately capped under liquid nitrogen conditions.

Standard Vitrification Protocol

The ultra-rapid vitrification protocol is identical to the standard protocol in terms of media, devices, and laboratory conditions, with the following modifications: Preparation step - Blastocyst shrinkage: Prior to equilibration, artificial collapse of the blastocyst is performed using a single laser pulse to induce blastocoel shrinkage. The subsequent steps are: 1. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 2-4 minutes. 2. Vitrification solution exposure: Transfer to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum of 90 seconds. 3. Loading: Loading of the blastocyst onto a Cryotop device. 4. Vitrification: Immediate plunging of the Cryotop into liquid nitrogen within 1 second. 5. Capping: Immediate capping under liquid nitrogen.

Ultra-Rapid Vitrification Protocol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Recipients of donor oocytes
  • Blastocysts suitable for cryopreservation

You may not qualify if:

  • Cycles involving PGT
  • Cycles not reaching blastocyst stage.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Hospital Universitario Quiron Dexeus

Barcelona, 08028, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario Quiron Dexeus

Barcelona, 08028, Spain

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Boyard J, Reignier A, Chtourou S, Lefebvre T, Barriere P, Freour T. Should artificial shrinkage be performed prior to blastocyst vitrification? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022 Feb;25(1):24-32. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1701205. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

    PMID: 31973647BACKGROUND
  • George JS, Keefe KW. Freezer burn or learning curve? Prolonged time since blastocyst vitrification and impact on pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2023 Jan;119(1):45-46. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.11.017. Epub 2022 Nov 19. No abstract available.

    PMID: 36410446BACKGROUND
  • Gunst J, Joris H, Vynck M, Godderis K, Vercammen M, Roggeman S, van de Vijver A. Validation and clinical study of single-step vitrification combined with single-step warming of human blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2026 Mar;43(3):837-850. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03790-1. Epub 2026 Feb 13.

    PMID: 41686351BACKGROUND
  • Kovacic B, Taborin M, Vlaisavljevic V, Reljic M, Knez J. To collapse or not to collapse blastocysts before vitrification? A matched case-control study on single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Oct;45(4):669-678. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.030. Epub 2022 Apr 10.

    PMID: 35963753BACKGROUND
  • Li Z, Wang YA, Ledger W, Edgar DH, Sullivan EA. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2794-801. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu246. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

    PMID: 25316444BACKGROUND
  • Martinez-Rodero I, Gallardo M, Pisaturo V, Scarica C, Conaghan J, Liebermann J, Cuevas-Saiz I. Shorter protocols for vitrification and post-warming dilution of human oocytes and embryos: a narrative review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2025 Aug;51(2):104857. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.104857. Epub 2025 Feb 7.

    PMID: 40479947BACKGROUND
  • Perez-Sanchez M, Pardinas ML, Diez-Juan A, Quinonero A, Dominguez F, Martin A, Vidal C, Beltran D, Mifsud A, Mercader A, Pellicer A, Cobo A, de Los Santos MJ. The effect of vitrification on blastocyst mitochondrial DNA dynamics and gene expression profiles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Nov;40(11):2577-2589. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02952-3. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

    PMID: 37801195BACKGROUND
  • Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, Vanderpoel S, Racowsky C. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):139-155. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038.

    PMID: 27827818BACKGROUND
  • Sciorio R, Tramontano L, Campos G, Greco PF, Mondrone G, Surbone A, Greco E, Talevi R, Pluchino N, Fleming S. Vitrification of human blastocysts for couples undergoing assisted reproduction: an updated review. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 May 17;12:1398049. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1398049. eCollection 2024.

    PMID: 38827525BACKGROUND
  • Sekhon L, Lee JA, Flisser E, Copperman AB, Stein D. Blastocyst vitrification, cryostorage and warming does not affect live birth rate, infant birth weight or timing of delivery. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Jul;37(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Apr 21.

    PMID: 29706285BACKGROUND
  • Van Landuyt L, Polyzos NP, De Munck N, Blockeel C, Van de Velde H, Verheyen G. A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2509-18. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev218. Epub 2015 Sep 12.

    PMID: 26364080BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital DiseasesUrogenital Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Monica Parriego, PhD

CONTACT

Ignacio Rodríguez, MSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2026

First Posted

April 29, 2026

Study Start

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Locations