Ultra-rapid Blastocyst Vitrification: Pilot Randomized Study
Clinical Validation of Ultra-rapid Blastocyst Vitrification: a Randomized Pilot Study in Oocyte Donation Cycles
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Blastocyst vitrification is standard in assisted reproduction, but clinical data on ultra-rapid vitrification are limited. This pilot study evaluates the safety, feasibility, and preliminary clinical performance of an ultra-rapid blastocyst vitrification protocol compared with the standard approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2028
April 29, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.6 years
April 13, 2026
April 22, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Post-warming survival rate
the proportion of vitrified blastocysts that remain morphologically viable after warming, expressed as a percentage of all warmed blastocysts.
Immediately after warming (within the same laboratory session)
Clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (only first transfer will be considered).
defined as the proportion of embryo transfers resulting in a clinical pregnancy, confirmed by the presence of an intrauterine gestational sac on ultrasound. Only the first embryo transfer per patient is included in the analysis.
6-8 weeks after embryo transfer
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Blastocyst re-expansion
Within 2 hours after warming
Post-warming blastocyst morphokinetic parameters
From embryo warming until embryo transfer (within 2-6 hours post-warming)
Post-warming blastocyst morphological quality
From embryo warming until embryo transfer (within 2-6 hours post-warming)
Technical or embryological adverse events.
From blastocyst warming until embryo transfer, within the same clinical procedure (up to 6 hours post-warming)
Study Arms (2)
Standard Vitrification Protocol
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe standard vitrification protocol corresponds to the routine clinical practice of the laboratory and consists of the following steps: 1. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 10-12 minutes at room temperature. 2. Vitrification solution exposure: Blastocysts are then transferred to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum exposure time of 90 seconds. 3. Loading: The blastocyst is loaded onto a Cryotop device (Kitazato). 4. Vitrification: The Cryotop is plunged directly into liquid nitrogen within 1 second of loading to ensure ultra-rapid cooling. 5. Capping: The Cryotop is immediately capped under liquid nitrogen conditions.
Ultra-Rapid Vitrification Protocol
EXPERIMENTALThe ultra-rapid vitrification protocol is identical to the standard protocol in terms of media, devices, and laboratory conditions, with the following modifications: Preparation step - Blastocyst shrinkage: Prior to equilibration, artificial collapse of the blastocyst is performed using a single laser pulse to induce blastocoel shrinkage. The subsequent steps are: 1\. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 2-4 minutes. Vitrification solution exposure: Transfer to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum of 90 seconds. 3\. Loading: Loading of the blastocyst onto a Cryotop device. 4. Vitrification: Immediate plunging of the Cryotop into liquid nitrogen within 1 second. 5\. Capping: Immediate capping under liquid nitrogen.
Interventions
1. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 10-12 minutes at room temperature. 2. Vitrification solution exposure: Blastocysts are then transferred to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum exposure time of 90 seconds. 3. Loading: The blastocyst is loaded onto a Cryotop device (Kitazato). 4. Vitrification: The Cryotop is plunged directly into liquid nitrogen within 1 second of loading to ensure ultra-rapid cooling. 5. Capping: The Cryotop is immediately capped under liquid nitrogen conditions.
The ultra-rapid vitrification protocol is identical to the standard protocol in terms of media, devices, and laboratory conditions, with the following modifications: Preparation step - Blastocyst shrinkage: Prior to equilibration, artificial collapse of the blastocyst is performed using a single laser pulse to induce blastocoel shrinkage. The subsequent steps are: 1. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 2-4 minutes. 2. Vitrification solution exposure: Transfer to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum of 90 seconds. 3. Loading: Loading of the blastocyst onto a Cryotop device. 4. Vitrification: Immediate plunging of the Cryotop into liquid nitrogen within 1 second. 5. Capping: Immediate capping under liquid nitrogen.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Recipients of donor oocytes
- Blastocysts suitable for cryopreservation
You may not qualify if:
- Cycles involving PGT
- Cycles not reaching blastocyst stage.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fundacion Dexeuslead
Study Sites (2)
Hospital Universitario Quiron Dexeus
Barcelona, 08028, Spain
Hospital Universitario Quiron Dexeus
Barcelona, 08028, Spain
Related Publications (11)
Boyard J, Reignier A, Chtourou S, Lefebvre T, Barriere P, Freour T. Should artificial shrinkage be performed prior to blastocyst vitrification? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022 Feb;25(1):24-32. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1701205. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
PMID: 31973647BACKGROUNDGeorge JS, Keefe KW. Freezer burn or learning curve? Prolonged time since blastocyst vitrification and impact on pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2023 Jan;119(1):45-46. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.11.017. Epub 2022 Nov 19. No abstract available.
PMID: 36410446BACKGROUNDGunst J, Joris H, Vynck M, Godderis K, Vercammen M, Roggeman S, van de Vijver A. Validation and clinical study of single-step vitrification combined with single-step warming of human blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2026 Mar;43(3):837-850. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03790-1. Epub 2026 Feb 13.
PMID: 41686351BACKGROUNDKovacic B, Taborin M, Vlaisavljevic V, Reljic M, Knez J. To collapse or not to collapse blastocysts before vitrification? A matched case-control study on single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Oct;45(4):669-678. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.030. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
PMID: 35963753BACKGROUNDLi Z, Wang YA, Ledger W, Edgar DH, Sullivan EA. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2794-801. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu246. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
PMID: 25316444BACKGROUNDMartinez-Rodero I, Gallardo M, Pisaturo V, Scarica C, Conaghan J, Liebermann J, Cuevas-Saiz I. Shorter protocols for vitrification and post-warming dilution of human oocytes and embryos: a narrative review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2025 Aug;51(2):104857. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.104857. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
PMID: 40479947BACKGROUNDPerez-Sanchez M, Pardinas ML, Diez-Juan A, Quinonero A, Dominguez F, Martin A, Vidal C, Beltran D, Mifsud A, Mercader A, Pellicer A, Cobo A, de Los Santos MJ. The effect of vitrification on blastocyst mitochondrial DNA dynamics and gene expression profiles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Nov;40(11):2577-2589. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02952-3. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
PMID: 37801195BACKGROUNDRienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, Vanderpoel S, Racowsky C. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):139-155. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038.
PMID: 27827818BACKGROUNDSciorio R, Tramontano L, Campos G, Greco PF, Mondrone G, Surbone A, Greco E, Talevi R, Pluchino N, Fleming S. Vitrification of human blastocysts for couples undergoing assisted reproduction: an updated review. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 May 17;12:1398049. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1398049. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38827525BACKGROUNDSekhon L, Lee JA, Flisser E, Copperman AB, Stein D. Blastocyst vitrification, cryostorage and warming does not affect live birth rate, infant birth weight or timing of delivery. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Jul;37(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
PMID: 29706285BACKGROUNDVan Landuyt L, Polyzos NP, De Munck N, Blockeel C, Van de Velde H, Verheyen G. A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2509-18. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev218. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
PMID: 26364080BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2026
First Posted
April 29, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04