NCT07547657

Brief Summary

This trial is designed to investigate how best to support hospitals in improving induction management and clinical outcomes. The researchers will investigate an adaptive implementation strategy designed to support hospitals in increasing adherence to evidence-based practices for induction of labor.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
28mo left

Started Apr 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress4%
Apr 2026Sep 2028

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2026

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 16, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 23, 2026

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2028

Last Updated

April 23, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

April 16, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 16, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Quality improvementadaptive interventionsequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Provider-level adherence to evidence-based IOL

    Defined as a percentage where the numerator = past month total number of evidence-based IOL techniques offered (regardless of whether they were completed, attempted unsuccessfully, or declined by the patient); and the denominator = past month total number of eligible opportunities to offer any evidence-based IOL technique. Data will be attributed at the individual provider level and analyzed at the provider level for the primary outcome. These data may also be aggregated at the hospital level-e.g., when examining whether % evidence-based IOL adherence at the hospital level is a moderator of the effects of LEAD and TEAM.

    Up to 30 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Adherence to evidence-based induction technique 1 (dual-agent cervical ripening)

    Up to 30 months

  • Adherence to technique 2 (early amniotomy)

    Up to 30 months

  • Median time induction to birth

    Up to 30 months

  • Percent delivery within 24 hours

    Up to 30 Months

  • Median time induction to membrane rupture

    Up to 30 Months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

BASE only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The BASE only comparator (control arm) starts with BASE in Stage 1, continues with BASE in Stage 2, and continues with BASE in Stage 3, regardless of Top Performer status. The BASE only arm is defined as the hospitals that get solely BASE (and nothing more) for 30 months.

Behavioral: BASE

BASE + TEAM

EXPERIMENTAL

BASE + TEAM starts with BASE in Stage 1, continues BASE in Stage 2, continues BASE in Stage 3 for Top Performer hospitals, and adds TEAM in Stage 3 for non-Top Performer hospitals. This arm does not offer LEAD.

Behavioral: BASEBehavioral: TEAM

BASE + LEAD

EXPERIMENTAL

BASE + LEAD starts with BASE in Stage 1, adds LEAD in Stage 2 for all hospitals, and continues BASE + LEAD in Stage 3 for all hospitals. This arm does not offer TEAM.

Behavioral: BASEBehavioral: LEAD

BASE + LEAD + TEAM

EXPERIMENTAL

BASE + LEAD + TEAM starts with BASE in Stage 1. In Stage 2, all hospitals are offered LEAD. In Stage 3, Top Performing hospitals continue BASE + LEAD, while non-Top Performing hospitals step up to TEAM in addition to BASE and LEAD. This is considered the most intensive of the four embedded implementation strategies.

Behavioral: BASEBehavioral: LEADBehavioral: TEAM

Interventions

BASEBEHAVIORAL

BASE (low-intensity, training and reporting, delivered virtually)

BASE + LEADBASE + LEAD + TEAMBASE + TEAMBASE only
LEADBEHAVIORAL

LEAD (moderate-intensity, Quality Improvement (QI) leader-focused, delivered virtually)

BASE + LEADBASE + LEAD + TEAM
TEAMBEHAVIORAL

TEAM (very high-intensity, clinician-focused, delivered in-person)

BASE + LEAD + TEAMBASE + TEAM

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Maternity Clinicians (Individuals implementing QI initiatives on participating maternity units, all bedside clinicians on these units, and any other hospital employees identified by OBI champions as relevant to include, will be eligible to attend LEAD and TEAM activities.)

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals not working on these units are ineligible, which will exclude children under the age of 18 and retired, older adults.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Lead

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Metals, HeavyElementsInorganic ChemicalsMetals

Study Officials

  • Michelle Moniz, MD, MSc

    University of Michigan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Carey Simpson

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Due to the need for investigators to participate in the delivery of the adaptive implementation intervention, neither investigators nor hospitals will be blinded to their assignment.
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: This is a clustered, Sequential, Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART), with up to 64 hospital members of the Obstetrics Initiative (OBI) (see Figure 1). The unit of randomization will be the hospital. Time is measured in months since the onset of Stage 1, when all hospitals are offered BASE. The first randomization-to LEAD vs no LEAD with equal probability-occurs at the beginning of Month 6 (Stage 2). Subsequent randomizations-to TEAM vs no TEAM (Stage 3) with equal probability-occur at the beginning of Month 13, among non-Top Performer hospitals. This SMART will address how best to sequence different strategies across a population, informing the construction of an optimized, three-stage, 30-month adaptive implementation strategy for adherence to evidence-based IOL. This study is a clustered SMART because the sequential randomizations (e.g., to LEAD, to TEAM) are at the hospital level, while the outcome is at the level of providers nested within hospitals.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Program Director, The Obstetrics Initiative

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2026

First Posted

April 23, 2026

Study Start

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Last Updated

April 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data generated in this study will be stored and archived in HIPAA-compliant Turbo drives at the University of Michigan. Turbo is a high-capacity, high-performance network storage solution, providing secure and reliable data storage to researchers across the University of Michigan. Due to OBI's existing Data Use Agreements with hospitals, the researchers will not be able to share data in an open repository.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
The data will be made available to other researchers, as soon as possible after a Data Use Agreement is executed with an interested party and OBI, in accordance with OBI Coordinating Center policy and OBI's existing Data Use Agreements with its member hospitals. To provide access to deidentified data from human subjects, the researchers will verify that the data receiver has met all necessary regulatory requirements (e.g., IRB approval, data use agreements, etc.)
More information

Locations