School-based Paraeducator Education for Engagement at Recess
SPEER
2 other identifiers
interventional
350
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of the proposed three-site study is to test whether an educator-level implementation strategy, coaching, with or without a school-level implementation strategy, school-based teams, will maximize paraeducators' use (fidelity and sustainment) of an evidence-based social engagement intervention, Remaking Recess (RR). RR aims to improve peer related social skills for autistic students and their non-autistic peers who are socially isolated or peripheral and need support during recess.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2029
August 15, 2025
August 1, 2025
5.1 years
August 15, 2024
August 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Remaking Recess Fidelity
This 20-item observation measure rates how well educators are observed to be using core Remaking Recess strategies with students on the playground. Minimum score 1, maximum score 5. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months, 16 months
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Playground Observation of Peer Engagement (POPE)
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months, 16 months
Friendship Survey
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Teacher Perceptions Measure
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months, 16 months
Cost Measure
Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months, 16 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Remaking Recess
ACTIVE COMPARATORRemaking Recess is a school-based social engagement intervention designed to enhance elementary school contextual factors to better support peer engagement during recess. Remaking Recess is delivered to educators through direct training and in vivo coaching by a certified Remaking Recess Coach.
TEAM
EXPERIMENTALSchools that are randomized to the TEAM condition will receive an additional implementation support intervention. TEAM will leverage existing human resources in the school to specifically focus on developing an implementation blueprint to foster a supportive implementation context for paraeducators to use Remaking Recess.
Interventions
Remaking Recess (RR) is a school-based social engagement intervention designed to enhance elementary school contextual factors to better support peer engagement during recess. Remaking Recess is delivered to educators through direct training and in vivo coaching by a certified Remaking Recess Coach.
Schools that are randomized to the TEAM condition will receive an additional implementation support intervention. TEAM will leverage existing human resources in the school to specifically focus on developing an implementation blueprint to foster a supportive implementation context for paraeducators to use Remaking Recess.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Students: Elementary aged students in K-5th grade who are autistic or have a neurodevelopmental disorder (Age 5-12)
- Educators: Paraeducators, teachers, or other school personnel that work with K-5th grade students in a public school in the United States (Age 18+)
You may not qualify if:
- Students or educators that have previously participated in Remaking Recess studies will not be eligible to enroll in this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
University of Oregon
Eugene, Oregon, 97403, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98115, United States
Related Publications (1)
Locke J, Sridhar A, Shih W, Shire S, Eisman AB, Kim E, Du A, Espeland C, Kasari C. Study protocol for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of a team-based implementation strategy to support educators' use of a social engagement intervention. Implement Sci. 2025 Jan 9;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01414-3.
PMID: 39789610DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Freda Liu, PhD
University of Washington
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- (participants will be masked during randomization process, after randomization they will be informed which condition they receive. Outcomes assessors will be masked to randomization and randomization outcome to the best of our ability)
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2024
First Posted
August 19, 2024
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2029
Last Updated
August 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share