NCT05510310

Brief Summary

To find the preferred method of labor induction (birth augmentation) for women with a history of one prior cesarean section scar and in grandmultiparas, the difference in time interval from augmentation to delivery will be measured between breast stimulation vs. low-dose oxytocin administration in this prospective single-center randomized controlled trial.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 5, 2022

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2022

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 22, 2022

Status Verified

August 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

August 5, 2022

Last Update Submit

August 18, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

labor inductionbirth augmentationuterine scarringcaesarian section

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time interval from augmentation of labor to delivery

    up to 48 hours

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Montevideo units in each group

    active first and second stage of labor (up to 48 hours)

  • rate of women who achieved vaginal delivery

    during labor (48 hours)

  • Endometritis

    during one week postpartum

  • Postpartum hemorrhage

    during the first 24 hours after labor

  • Apgar score 3 or less at 5 minutes

    during the first 5 minutes postpartum

Study Arms (2)

Breast stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Breast pump for breast stimulation: The suction cup will be placed on the breast, held by the patient or a strap, alternated between nipples every 15 minutes, with a pause of 15 minutes after each 30 minutes. Suction intensity will be adjusted to the maximum tolerated by the patient while avoiding causing pain or discomfort. Treatment will be continued for a maximum of 12 hours.

Procedure: Breast stimulation

Low-dose oxytocin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Low-dose oxytocin will be administered intravenously, starting at a dose of 0.5-2 milliunits\\minute, and increasing incrementally by 1-2 milliunites\\minute every 15-40 minutes. Treatment will be continued for a maximum of 12 hours.

Biological: Oxytocin

Interventions

By breast pump

Breast stimulation
OxytocinBIOLOGICAL

Oxytocin will be administered intravenously and titrated

Low-dose oxytocin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Singleton vertex gestations at or beyond 37 weeks of gestation
  • History of one prior cesarean section scar or grandmultipara (birth number 6 and above),
  • Spontaneous onset of labor or after labor induction by Foley balloon catheter, eligible for this trial
  • Determined by the obstetrics care team that augmentation was needed.
  • Augmentation will be initiated at or beyond 2.5 cm dilation, with or without ruptured membranes and uterine activity less than 3 contractions in 10 minutes on tocodynamometry.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of two prior cesarean section scars,
  • Younger than 18 years,
  • Any contraindication for vaginal birth (placenta previa, vasa previa, cord presentation, inadequate pelvis, prior uterine rupture),
  • Fetuses in nonvertex presentation
  • Fetuses with suspected life-limiting anomalies,
  • Suspected abruption or bleeding of unknown origin,
  • Women who did not agree to the enter the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Galil Medical Center

Nahariya, Israel

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Sentilhes L, Vayssiere C, Beucher G, Deneux-Tharaux C, Deruelle P, Diemunsch P, Gallot D, Haumonte JB, Heimann S, Kayem G, Lopez E, Parant O, Schmitz T, Sellier Y, Rozenberg P, d'Ercole C. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

    PMID: 23810846BACKGROUND
  • Beucher G, Dolley P, Levy-Thissier S, Florian A, Dreyfus M. [Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Dec;41(8):708-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.028. Epub 2012 Nov 14. French.

    PMID: 23159201BACKGROUND
  • Penfield CA, Wing DA. Labor Induction Techniques: Which Is the Best? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;44(4):567-582. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.08.011.

    PMID: 29078939BACKGROUND
  • Deruelle P, Lepage J, Depret S, Clouqueur E. [Induction of labor and intrapartum management for women with uterine scar]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Dec;41(8):788-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.030. Epub 2012 Nov 9. French.

    PMID: 23142358BACKGROUND
  • Christensson K, Nilsson BA, Stock S, Matthiesen AS, Uvnas-Moberg K. Effect of nipple stimulation on uterine activity and on plasma levels of oxytocin in full term, healthy, pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68(3):205-10. doi: 10.3109/00016348909020990.

    PMID: 2618602BACKGROUND
  • Demirel G, Guler H. The Effect of Uterine and Nipple Stimulation on Induction With Oxytocin and the Labor Process. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Oct;12(5):273-80. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12116.

    PMID: 26444882BACKGROUND
  • Jhirad A, Vago T. Induction of labor by breast stimulation. Obstet Gynecol. 1973 Mar;41(3):347-50. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4688251BACKGROUND
  • Shalev E, Weiner E, Tzabari A, Engelhard J, Zuckerman H, Shalev J, Serr DM. Breast stimulation in late pregnancy. Effect on prostaglandin secretion. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1990;29(2):125-7. doi: 10.1159/000293317.

    PMID: 2335311BACKGROUND
  • Elliott JP, Flaherty JF. The use of breast stimulation to ripen the cervix in term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Mar 1;145(5):553-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)91194-8.

    PMID: 6338721BACKGROUND
  • Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD003392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003392.pub2.

    PMID: 16034897BACKGROUND
  • Singh N, Tripathi R, Mala YM, Yedla N. Breast stimulation in low-risk primigravidas at term: does it aid in spontaneous onset of labour and vaginal delivery? A pilot study. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:695037. doi: 10.1155/2014/695037. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

    PMID: 25525601BACKGROUND
  • Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD003392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003392.

    PMID: 11687199BACKGROUND
  • Segal S, Gemer O, Zohav E, Siani M, Sassoon E. Evaluation of breast stimulation for induction of labor in women with a prior cesarean section and in grandmultiparas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995 Jan;74(1):40-1. doi: 10.3109/00016349509009941.

    PMID: 7856430BACKGROUND
  • Uvnas-Moberg K, Ekstrom-Bergstrom A, Berg M, Buckley S, Pajalic Z, Hadjigeorgiou E, Kotlowska A, Lengler L, Kielbratowska B, Leon-Larios F, Magistretti CM, Downe S, Lindstrom B, Dencker A. Maternal plasma levels of oxytocin during physiological childbirth - a systematic review with implications for uterine contractions and central actions of oxytocin. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2365-9.

    PMID: 31399062BACKGROUND
  • Mashini IS, Devoe LD, McKenzie JS, Hadi HA, Sherline DM. Comparison of uterine activity induced by nipple stimulation and oxytocin. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;69(1):74-8.

    PMID: 3796923BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Uterine Rupture

Interventions

Oxytocin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Uterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsGenital DiseasesRuptureWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pituitary Hormones, PosteriorPituitary HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Study Officials

  • Maya Wolf, MD

    Galilee Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Maya Wolf, MD

CONTACT

Osnat Sharon, CRC

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: prospective, two-arm, active-comparator, randomized, controlled
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of the Mother and Fetus Unit

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2022

First Posted

August 22, 2022

Study Start

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion

October 1, 2024

Study Completion

April 1, 2025

Last Updated

August 22, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-08

Locations