NCT07544030

Brief Summary

Evaluation Compared with traditional NACT, whether PIPAC can increase the incidence of CRS3 determines the rationality of choosing PIPAC.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable ovarian-cancer

Timeline
18mo left

Started Nov 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress24%
Nov 2025Nov 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 10, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 21, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 22, 2026

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 10, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 10, 2027

Last Updated

April 22, 2026

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

March 21, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 19, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Ovarian CancerPIPAC

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Can PIPAC increase the incidence of CRS3

    The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether PIPAC can increase the incidence of CRS3 compared to traditional NACT, thereby determining the rationale for choosing PIPAC. The main evaluation metric is derived from the CRS scoring system. According to the ICCR guidelines, the CRS score is obtained through pathological analysis of the peritoneal tissue collected during IDS.

    Two years

Study Arms (1)

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Pressurized In

EXPERIMENTAL

This is a randomized, controlled, open, and parallel design clinical study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of PIPAC. Sixty patients with stage IIIC-IVA high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) were randomly assigned to either the traditional NACT or PIPAC group for treatment, and the incidence of CRS3 was then assessed. This study is exploratory, and statistical analysis will be conducted after all cases have been treated and followed up, providing a basis for future clinical studies.

Procedure: PIPACProcedure: NACT

Interventions

PIPACPROCEDURE

This is a randomized, controlled, open, and parallel design clinical study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of PIPAC. Sixty patients with stage IIIC-IVA high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) were randomly assigned to either the traditional NACT or PIPAC group for treatment, and the incidence of CRS3 was then assessed. This study is exploratory, and statistical analysis will be conducted after all cases have been treated and followed up, providing a basis for future clinical studies.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Pressurized In
NACTPROCEDURE

This is a randomized, controlled, open, and parallel design clinical study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of PIPAC. Sixty patients with stage IIIC-IVA high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) were randomly assigned to either the traditional NACT or PIPAC group for treatment, and the incidence of CRS3 was then assessed. This study is exploratory, and statistical analysis will be conducted after all cases have been treated and followed up, providing a basis for future clinical studies.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Pressurized In

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with high-grade serous adenocarcinoma (HGSOC) with FIGO stage IIIC-IVA.
  • Age between 18 and 70.
  • Patients were evaluated with Fagotti score and MD Anderson score. MD Anderson score was consistent with Fagotti score ≥ 8, which was evaluated as high tumor load, because the initial curative resection could not achieve R0 resection and NACT was selected; or patients could not tolerate the initial surgery due to severe complications and NACT was selected.
  • Normal renal function (blood creatinine: 58-96 μmol/L).
  • No bone marrow suppression (HBG ≥ 110 g/L, white blood cell count ≥ 4.0×109/L, neutropenia Granulocyte count greater than or equal to 2.0x109/L and platelet count greater than or equal to 100x109/L).
  • Normal liver function (bilirubin 3.4-22.2 μmol/L, ALT 7-40 U/L, AST 13-35 U/L, AST/ALT≤ 1.5)。
  • World Health Organization Performance status score (WHO score) 0-2 points.

You may not qualify if:

  • \) Patients with other malignancies or have received any form of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy for this disease in other hospitals.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The First Hospital of Jilin University

Changchun, Jilin, 130000, China

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ovarian Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endocrine Gland NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsOvarian DiseasesAdnexal DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsGenital DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesGonadal Disorders

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2026

First Posted

April 22, 2026

Study Start

November 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 10, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 10, 2027

Last Updated

April 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations