NCT07541248

Brief Summary

This study primarily aims to evaluate the impact of a 12-week peer role-play simulation model on the professional development of undergraduate physiotherapy students. Unlike traditional teacher-led case discussions, this study explores the effect of active participation in clinical scenarios, in which students alternate between the roles of 'clinician' and 'patient', on their academic achievement, self-efficacy and perceived clinical readiness. Specifically, the study aims to determine whether this interactive, low-cost pedagogical approach is a superior alternative to conventional lecture-based methods for preparing students for real-world clinical environments, particularly in high-enrolment academic settings.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started May 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress11%
May 2026Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 14, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 21, 2026

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2026

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 15, 2026

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 21, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

14 days

First QC Date

April 14, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 14, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Physiotherapy EducationClinical ReasoningSimulation-Based LearningClinical CompetencePeer Role-PlayHealth Profession StudentsSelf-Efficacy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Physiotherapist Self-Efficacy (PSE) Scale Score

    Evaluation of students' perceived competence in clinical problem-solving, planning, and communication across three domains: neurological, musculoskeletal, and cardiopulmonary. The scale consists of 13 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "very little confidence" to 5 = "very much confidence"). Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.

    Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 12).

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Perception of Clinical Readiness and Simulation Experience

    Baseline (Week 0) and Post-Intervention (Week 12).

  • Case-Based Written Examination:

    Post-Intervention (Week 13, during finals week).

  • Practical Examination / OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination)

    Post-Intervention (Week 14, during finals week)

  • Clinical Performance (End of Clinical Placement)

    Post-Intervention (Week 13, during finals week).

Study Arms (2)

Peer Role-Play Simulation (PRPS)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will engage in a 12-week structured peer role-play simulation program. The intervention focuses on neurological pathologies using scenarios. Each weekly session (120 minutes) follows a three-phase experiential learning model: Pre-briefing (30 min): Facilitator-guided case analysis and clinical reasoning setup using structured forms. Simulation (60 min): Active role-playing in a simulated clinic. Groups of 10 are split into subgroups (n=5) where students rotate through roles: Lead Therapist, Assistant, Patient, and Observer. Rotations occur every 15 minutes to ensure multi-perspective exposure. Debriefing (30 min): Reflective discussion involving self-assessment, peer feedback, and facilitator guidance focusing on clinical reasoning, safety, and professional communication.

Behavioral: Peer Role-Play Simulation (PRPS)

Traditional Case-Based Learning (CBL)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in the control group will follow a standardized Case-Based Learning (CBL) methodology. To ensure comparability, this group will address the same clinical neurological scenarios as the experimental group but through a traditional pedagogical framework. Students will receive the written clinical cases one week in advance to conduct literature reviews, identify problem lists, set therapeutic goals, and justify intervention plans. During the weekly session, students will present their case analyses. The instructor will facilitate structured discussions to refine clinical reasoning. Students will supplement their presentations with video recordings of practical physiotherapy intervention demonstrations. These demonstrations will then be reviewed and discussed in a classroom setting.

Behavioral: Traditional Case-Based Learning (CBL)

Interventions

A 12-week educational intervention where students rotate through roles of therapist, patient, and observer in simulated neurological clinical scenarios, followed by structured debriefing sessions.

Peer Role-Play Simulation (PRPS)

A 12-week pedagogical approach involving independent case analysis of written scenarios, classroom presentations, and video-assisted demonstrations of physiotherapy skills.

Traditional Case-Based Learning (CBL)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Current enrollment as a senior (4th-year) undergraduate student in the Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation at Istanbul Medipol University.
  • Active participation in the "Clinical Problem Solving" course.
  • Voluntary agreement to participate and signing of the informed consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Students who have previously taken the "Clinical Problem Solving" course or a similar simulation-based elective.
  • Failure to attend more than 20% of the 12-week course sessions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Central Study Contacts

Gizem Yılmaz Babacan

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2026

First Posted

April 21, 2026

Study Start

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 21, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share