The Effect of Post-Scenario Debriefing and Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in Anaphylactic Shock Training on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Performance, Self-Confidence, and Satisfaction

NCT07388329 | Active Not Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: 171622998.600-294
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 80
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study aims to examine the effect of rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) on nursing students' knowledge, performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction levels regarding anaphylactic shock management. Based on a randomized controlled study design, the study will compare third-year nursing students in terms of RCDP application with traditional analysis methods performed at the end of a scenario. Students, divided into intervention and control groups, will have their knowledge levels, simulation performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction assessed using various scales. The retention of learning and students' subjective learning experiences will also be included in the research. The outcome of this study will determine whether RCDP is an effective method for improving critical clinical decision-making and emergency management skills in nursing students.

Conditions

Nursing Students; Nursing Education; Simulation Based Learning

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Nursing students' knowledge level regarding shock and anaphylactic shock: Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock

  Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock The 'Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock,' developed by researchers in line with the literature (Ren et al., 2022; Arslan, 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Karadakovan \& Eti Aslan, 2017; Eti Aslan, 2017; Nair \& Peate, 2018), will be administered as follows: a 'Pre-Test' before the training to determine the students' current knowledge level regarding shock and anaphylactic shock; a 'Post-Test' immediately following the simulation application after the training; and a '1st Retention Test' 8 weeks later to measure the retention of learning. The Knowledge Test consists of 25 multiple-choice questions with 5 options each, focusing on knowledge levels regarding shock and anaphylactic shock. This form has been finalized with necessary adjustments based on expert opinions. The maximum score on this test is 100 points, and the minimum is 0 points. A higher score indicates a higher level of knowledge.

  before the intervention, on the day of the intervention, and 8 weeks after the intervention.

• Simulation Performance Checklist: Nursing Students' Performance Level Regarding Anaphylactic Shock

  Simulation Performance Checklist The 'Simulation Performance Checklist for Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock', created by researchers in line with the literature (Casale et al., 2023; Ren et al., 2022; Arslan, 2021; Dreborg and Him, 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Eti Aslan, 2017; Karadakovan, 2017), will be used to determine students' performance levels. A 'Post-Test' will be administered immediately after the simulation application, and a '1st Retention Test' will be administered after 8 weeks to measure the retention of learning. The checklist consists of 10 items, and each item is scored as "0 = Could not/Did not apply/No", "1 = Did/Applied/Yes". A minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10 can be obtained from the checklist. This form has been finalized after necessary adjustments were made in line with expert opinions.

  on the same day as the intervention and 8 weeks after the intervention

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale: Self-confidence and satisfaction levels of nursing students

  before the intervention and on the day of the intervention

• Debriefing Experience Scale

  The simulation applications will be conducted on the same day.

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Group

EXPERIMENTAL

rapid cycle deliberate practice

Behavioral: rapid cycle deliberate practice

Control group

EXPERIMENTAL

post-scenario debriefing

Behavioral: Post-scenario debriefing

Interventions

rapid cycle deliberate practice BEHAVIORAL

Unlike traditional debriefing, feedback is provided by pausing the scenario within the simulation. Then the part of the script up to the pause point is repeated.

Intervention Group

Post-scenario debriefing BEHAVIORAL

Debriefing is performed at the end of the simulation scenario.

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• To agree to participate in the study:
• Being a 3rd year nursing student
• Not working as a nurse in a hospital or any healthcare facility

You may not qualify if:

• Refusing to participate in the study.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Baskent University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Baskent University

Ankara, Ankara, 06790, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: OTHER
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Lecturer in Nursing, MSc

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: January 21, 2026
• First Posted: February 5, 2026
• Study Start: January 15, 2026
• Primary Completion (Estimated): June 30, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): July 15, 2026
• Last Updated: February 10, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations

TU (1)