NCT07540325

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate gait in individuals diagnosed with PD under tasks involving different cognitive domains, to compare the results with those of age and sex-matched healthy individuals, and to determine which cognitive function has the greatest impact on gait in PD.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
8mo left

Started Apr 2026

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress7%
Apr 2026Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 24, 2026

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 20, 2026

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

April 20, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

March 24, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 17, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

GaitCognitive FunctionDual-TaskParkinson's Disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Global Cognition Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    The assessment of cognitive functions will begin with the evaluation of global cognition. Global cognition will be evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is a validated scale designed to assess multiple cognitive functions, including attention, concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuospatial skills, abstract reasoning, calculation, and orientation. The instrument has a maximum total score of 30 points. According to the original validation study, scores of 26 and above are generally considered to represent normal cognitive function, whereas scores below 26 are reported to indicate potential cognitive impairment. For the purpose of this study, an inclusion criterion of a MoCA score ≥ 21 has been established.

    Day 1

  • Language Function Assessed by the Boston Naming Test

    The short form of the Boston Naming Test (BNT), consisting of 15 items (BNT-15), will be used to assess language function. The test comprises images ranging from commonly recognized objects to those that are progressively more difficult to identify. Participants are asked to name the object depicted in each image. If the participant is unable to provide the correct name (e.g., "pelican"), semantic or phonemic cues (e.g., "it is a bird," "pe…") may be provided. The examiner records the type and number of cues required and whether they lead to a correct response. Each correct response is scored as 1 point. The maximum possible score is 15 points, with higher scores indicating better language performance.

    Day 1

  • Memory Assessed by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

    The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) will be used to assess memory. This test evaluates verbal learning, immediate verbal memory, susceptibility to interference, free recall, and recognition memory. Scoring is based on the number of correctly recalled words in each trial, delayed recall performance, and the number of correctly rejected distractor items during the recognition phase. Higher scores across all indices indicate superior verbal learning and memory capacity, while significant discrepancies between immediate and delayed recall may suggest retrieval or storage deficits.

    Day 1

  • Visuospatial Function Assessed by the Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test

    The Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test (JLOT), will be used to assess visuospatial function. The primary aim of the test is to evaluate the individual's ability to perceive, organize, and relate elements within a visual stimulus according to their spatial orientation. The test consists of 30 items, and task difficulty increases progressively as the line segments are shortened from the top or bottom. Scoring is based on paired responses; a point is awarded only if both lines in a pair are correctly identified. Higher scores indicate superior visuospatial perception and spatial relation skills, whereas lower scores may reflect impairments in right-hemisphere mediated spatial organization.

    Day 1

  • Executive Function Assessed by the Stroop Test (Çapa Version)

    The Stroop Test (Çapa Version) will be used to assess executive functions. This test evaluates selective attention, response inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and information processing speed. The test consists of two stimulus cards. The first card includes 60 colored rectangles (red, green, and blue) arranged in six rows of ten items each. The second card contains color words printed in incongruent ink colors in the same format. For each stage, completion time is recorded in seconds using a digital stopwatch, while the number of errors and self-corrections is recorded as counts. The "interference resistance" time (Stroop D) is calculated in seconds using the formula: Stroop D = Stroop C - Stroop B

    Day 1

  • Attention Assessed by the Digit Span Test

    The Digit Span Test, a subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, is used to assess attention and concentration. It consists of two components: forward digit span and backward digit span, each associated with different cognitive processes. The scoring was determined by the longest sequence of digits correctly repeated in at least one of the two trials for each level. The maximum attainable span length was 7 for the forward condition and 6 for the backward condition. Based on established norms, the lower limits for normal function were defined as a span of 6 for forward and 4 for backward sequences. The difference between forward and backward digit span should not exceed two digits. Higher scores represent superior working memory and attentional performance.

    Day 1

  • Analysis of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Under Dual-Task Conditions

    Spatiotemporal gait parameters and variability measures will be assessed using the SensorMedica FreeMed baropodometric platform. Within the scope of gait analysis, each participant will first be asked to walk at a self-selected comfortable speed without any dual-task condition, and baseline spatiotemporal parameters will be recorded. Subsequently, gait will be assessed under predefined cognitive dual-task conditions. In this study, participants will be instructed to walk continuously on the platform without stopping, completing at least 40 steps. To ensure a detailed gait analysis, the following parameters will be recorded and reported independently: Step length (cm), step width (cm), cadence (steps/min), step cycle duration (s), stance and swing phase durations (% of gait cycle), single and double support times (s), and gait variability (CV%). Multiple units will be reported for each specific gait sub-parameter as detailed in the description.

    Day 2

  • Cognitive Dual-Task Gait Protocol

    This study evaluates gait performance under five cognitive dual-task conditions targeting language, memory, attention, visuospatial, and executive functions in Parkinson's disease (PD). Tasks were developed based on standardized neuropsychological tests, including the Boston Naming Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Benton Judgment of Line Orientation, Digit Span, MoCA, and Stroop Test. Participants walk at a self-selected pace on a gait platform under seven conditions: single-task, five cognitive dual-tasks, and a motor dual-task. In the single-task condition, participants walk at a comfortable speed. Language tasks involve naming images; memory tasks require recalling word lists; visuospatial tasks involve identifying line orientations; executive tasks require naming ink color of incongruent words; attention tasks involve repeating digit sequences. In the motor task, participants walk while carrying a glass of water.

    Day 2

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III: Motor Examination (MDS-UPDRS III)

    Day 1

  • Anxiety and Depression Assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Day 1

  • Static Balance Assessed by the SensorMedica FreeMed Device

    Day 2

  • Dual-Task Cost

    Day 2

Study Arms (2)

Parkinson's Disease Group

This group consists of individuals diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's Disease by a specialist neurologist according to the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank clinical diagnostic criteria, with a disease severity between stages 1 and 3 according to the Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale.

Healthy Control Group

This group includes healthy volunteers with similar age, gender, and educational background to the Parkinson's Disease group, and who have no history of any neurological, psychiatric, or musculoskeletal disorders that could affect gait or cognitive performance.

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population includes patients diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease who are followed up or treated at the Gazi University and age-matched healthy volunteers from the local community in Ankara.

You may qualify if:

  • A clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease confirmed by a neurologist according to the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank diagnostic criteria
  • Classified between stages 1 and 3 according to the Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging Scale
  • Aged between 40 and 80 years
  • A score of at least 21 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
  • Ability to walk continuously for at least 10 minutes without interruption and without the use of any assistive walking device
  • Having received at least 5 years of formal education

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of any neurological disorder other than Parkinson's Disease
  • Presence of any cardiopulmonary or musculoskeletal condition that may impair safe ambulation
  • A score of ≥10 for anxiety and ≥7 for depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
  • Presence of visual or auditory impairments that cannot be corrected with assistive devices
  • Aged between 40 and 80 years
  • A score of at least 21 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
  • Presence of any neurological disorder
  • Presence of any cardiopulmonary or musculoskeletal condition that may affect safe ambulation
  • A score of ≥10 for anxiety and ≥7 for depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
  • Presence of visual or auditory impairments that cannot be corrected with assistive devices

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gazi University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation.

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Penko AL, Streicher MC, Koop MM, Dey T, Rosenfeldt AB, Bazyk AS, Alberts JL. Dual-task Interference Disrupts Parkinson's Gait Across Multiple Cognitive Domains. Neuroscience. 2018 May 21;379:375-382. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

    PMID: 29577998BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson DiseaseMobility Limitation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Arzu GUCLU GUNDUZ

    Gazi University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Target Duration
2 Days
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Profesor Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2026

First Posted

April 20, 2026

Study Start

April 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

April 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations