NCT07533877

Brief Summary

This randomized controlled online experiment will test whether adding an ultra-processed food (UPF) warning label to the FDA's proposed Nutrition Information Box (NIB) changes consumer perceptions of UPFs among a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Participants will be randomized to one of four label conditions and will evaluate four UPF yogurt products with different nutritional profiles on the NIB. The primary outcome is purchase intent and the secondary outcomes are perceived healthfulness, perceived usefulness and correct identification of UPF products. This experiment aims to answer the following questions: Do UPF warning labels reduce purchase intentions compared to the NIB alone? Do UPF warning labels reduce perceived healthfulness compared to the NIB alone? Do UPF warning labels help more consumers correctly identify products as ultra-processed compared to the NIB alone? Do different UPF warning label color designs differ in effectiveness at reducing purchase intentions, lowering perceived healthfulness, and improving correct identification of UPFs? Researchers will compare outcomes across the four randomized arms to estimate the independent effect of adding UPF warnings beyond nutrient disclosure in the NIB alone.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
0mo left

Started Apr 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress38%
Apr 2026May 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2026

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 10, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 16, 2026

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 14, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 14, 2026

Last Updated

April 16, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

April 10, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 10, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

DietNutrition LabelingUltra-processedConsumer Behavior

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Purchase Intent

    Likelihood of purchasing each product measured on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = "Very unlikely" to 5 = "Very likely" indicating how likely the participant would be to buy the product in the next week if it were available in a store. Higher scores indicate greater purchase intent.

    Immediately after label exposure

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Correct Identification of UPF

    Immediately after label exposure

  • Perceived Healthfulness

    Immediately after label exposure

  • Perceived Usefulness

    Immediately after label exposure

Study Arms (4)

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

NIB only

Behavioral: Label exposure in mock-up UPF products

NIB + UPFWL 1

EXPERIMENTAL

NIB + UPF Warning Label Yellow

Behavioral: Label exposure in mock-up UPF products

NIB + UPFWL 2

EXPERIMENTAL

NIB + UPF Warning Label Red

Behavioral: Label exposure in mock-up UPF products

NIB + UPFWL 3

EXPERIMENTAL

NIB + UPF Warning Label Black

Behavioral: Label exposure in mock-up UPF products

Interventions

This intervention consists of exposure to ultra-processed warning label (UPFWL) conditions embedded within the FDA Nutrition Information Box (NIB). Participants view mock-ups of ultra-processed yogurt products displaying either the NIB alone or the NIB combined with a UPFWL (yellow, red, or black). This intervention experimentally isolates the incremental effect of adding a processing-based warning across products with varying nutritional profiles, providing evidence on how UPFWL, independent of nutrient content, can alter purchase intent, identification of UPFs and perceived healthfulness.

ControlNIB + UPFWL 1NIB + UPFWL 2NIB + UPFWL 3

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age or older
  • Member of the Verasight Panel
  • Residing in the United States

You may not qualify if:

  • \<18 years of age
  • Not residing in the United States
  • Completed the survey in less than one-third of the median completion duration of all participants
  • Respondents with high refusal rates (skipped or refused more than 50% of questions)
  • Respondents who 'straight-line' all question grids with 6 or more items, where responses are not internally consistent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Consumer Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

  • Julia Wolfson, PhD

    Johns Hopkins University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Julia A Wolfson, PhD. Principal Investigator

CONTACT

Nina Carr, MPH, MBA

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will view four UPF yogurt products of different nutritional profiles (presented in random order). Participants will be randomized to view the yogurt products with one of four labeling schemes applied: (1) NIB only Control, (2) NIB + UPF label Yellow, (3) NIB + UPF label Red, (4) NIB + UPF label Black. After viewing each product, participants will answer survey questions to assess the intention to purchase the product and the perceived healthfulness of the product, and correct identification of UPF products. Then, the participant will view the assigned label again and answer an additional question about how useful the label is.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2026

First Posted

April 16, 2026

Study Start

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 14, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 14, 2026

Last Updated

April 16, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Locations