Testing Ultra-processed Warning Labels in United States
UPFWL-NIB
Testing Adding Ultra-processed Warning Labels in the FDA Nutrition Info Box, a Randomized Online Experiment in Adults in the United States
1 other identifier
interventional
7,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled online experiment will test whether adding an ultra-processed food (UPF) warning label to the FDA's proposed Nutrition Information Box (NIB) changes consumer perceptions of UPFs among a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Participants will be randomized to one of four label conditions and will evaluate four UPF yogurt products with different nutritional profiles on the NIB. The primary outcome is purchase intent and the secondary outcomes are perceived healthfulness, perceived usefulness and correct identification of UPF products. This experiment aims to answer the following questions: Do UPF warning labels reduce purchase intentions compared to the NIB alone? Do UPF warning labels reduce perceived healthfulness compared to the NIB alone? Do UPF warning labels help more consumers correctly identify products as ultra-processed compared to the NIB alone? Do different UPF warning label color designs differ in effectiveness at reducing purchase intentions, lowering perceived healthfulness, and improving correct identification of UPFs? Researchers will compare outcomes across the four randomized arms to estimate the independent effect of adding UPF warnings beyond nutrient disclosure in the NIB alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 14, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 14, 2026
April 16, 2026
April 1, 2026
1 month
April 10, 2026
April 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Purchase Intent
Likelihood of purchasing each product measured on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = "Very unlikely" to 5 = "Very likely" indicating how likely the participant would be to buy the product in the next week if it were available in a store. Higher scores indicate greater purchase intent.
Immediately after label exposure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Correct Identification of UPF
Immediately after label exposure
Perceived Healthfulness
Immediately after label exposure
Perceived Usefulness
Immediately after label exposure
Study Arms (4)
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORNIB only
NIB + UPFWL 1
EXPERIMENTALNIB + UPF Warning Label Yellow
NIB + UPFWL 2
EXPERIMENTALNIB + UPF Warning Label Red
NIB + UPFWL 3
EXPERIMENTALNIB + UPF Warning Label Black
Interventions
This intervention consists of exposure to ultra-processed warning label (UPFWL) conditions embedded within the FDA Nutrition Information Box (NIB). Participants view mock-ups of ultra-processed yogurt products displaying either the NIB alone or the NIB combined with a UPFWL (yellow, red, or black). This intervention experimentally isolates the incremental effect of adding a processing-based warning across products with varying nutritional profiles, providing evidence on how UPFWL, independent of nutrient content, can alter purchase intent, identification of UPFs and perceived healthfulness.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- Member of the Verasight Panel
- Residing in the United States
You may not qualify if:
- \<18 years of age
- Not residing in the United States
- Completed the survey in less than one-third of the median completion duration of all participants
- Respondents with high refusal rates (skipped or refused more than 50% of questions)
- Respondents who 'straight-line' all question grids with 6 or more items, where responses are not internally consistent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julia Wolfson, PhD
Johns Hopkins University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2026
First Posted
April 16, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 14, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 14, 2026
Last Updated
April 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04