Promoting Students' Development of Ultimate Concern Care Strategies
Comparing the Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Steps and Generative AI in Promoting Students' Development of Ultimate Concern Care Strategies: Challenges and Reflections on Meta-Cognition
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Teaching intervention
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 6, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2026
April 16, 2026
April 1, 2026
11 months
April 6, 2026
April 9, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
metacognitive self-regulated learning ability
A 12-item metacognitive self-regulated learning ability scale was used to assess students' metacognitive self-regulated learning ability. The scale encompasses the planning, monitoring, and regulation of cognitive self-regulation activities and employs a 7-point scoring system, with higher scores indicating stronger metacognitive self-regulated learning ability.
Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
teamwork
The peer learning subscale uses a 3-question scale with a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better teamwork.
Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
self-efficacy
The Learning and Performance Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess students' learning self-efficacy. The scale consists of 8 questions and uses a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better learning efficacy.
Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
Study Arms (1)
To compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' develo
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
This study adopted a mixed-method design, incorporating a single-group pre- and post-test experimental study and participatory action research. The study involved 110 fourth-year students from the Department of Nursing at Medical University, who are enrolled in the introductory nursing research, nursing ethics, and nursing practices course
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- student over 20 years old
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
No.110, Sec.1, Jianguo N.Rd.,Taichung City 40201,Taiwan, R.O.C.
Taichung, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2026
First Posted
April 16, 2026
Study Start
September 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2026
Last Updated
April 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share