Performance, Acceptability, and Usability of a Novel Rapid Lateral Flow Test for Detecting Neisseria Gonorrhoeae in Pregnant and Symptomatic Women Attending Clinics in South Africa.
GO-SA
Evaluation of Performance, Acceptability, and Usability of a Novel Lateral Flow Assay for Point-of-Care Detection of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection Among Pregnant and Symptomatic Women in South Africa
2 other identifiers
observational
1,239
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Previous studies of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) lateral flow assay (LFA) have shown promising results. In East London, South Africa, the LFA demonstrated a sensitivity of 80% in asymptomatic women. However, a study in Zimbabwe reported a lower sensitivity of 65% among pregnant women attending antenatal care (ANC). This discrepancy raises important questions about the test's performance in pregnant women in the East London ANC population. Physiological changes during pregnancy may influence test accuracy, highlighting the need for further investigation in this specific population and setting. This study aims to evaluate the performance, acceptability, and usability of the NG LFA among pregnant and symptomatic women attending clinics in East London. Participants will provide clinical samples that are tested using both the NG LFA and standard laboratory methods to assess diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity and specificity. The study will specifically determine whether pregnancy affects the test's performance and whether the LFA is reliable for routine use in ANC clinics. Confirming its accuracy could enable wider implementation, improving case detection, treatment rates, and reducing the burden of gonorrhea in the community. In addition to evaluating performance, the study will investigate the feasibility of self-collected samples. Self-collection offers privacy, convenience, and may increase participation in testing, particularly for women who prefer this method. It may also reduce the workload for healthcare providers, especially in resource-limited settings. The study will compare the accuracy of self-collected samples with clinician-collected samples to determine whether self-collection is a viable option in ANC and symptomatic populations. The findings will provide crucial evidence to guide implementation of the NG LFA in primary care and ANC clinics, supporting timely diagnosis and treatment. If successful, this approach could strengthen gonorrhea screening programs, enhance patient-centered care, and contribute to better sexual and reproductive health outcomes for women in South Africa.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
April 15, 2026
April 1, 2026
10 months
April 8, 2026
April 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the NG LFA for the detection of NG in provider-collected vaginal samples from pregnant women attending ANC when compared to Xpert® CT/NG as the reference standard.
Point estimates of sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (Wilson's score method) among pregnant ANC attendees.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (6)
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the NG LFA for the detection of NG in vaginal provider-collected samples among symptomatic non-pregnant women.
Baseline
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the NG LFA for the detection of NG in vaginal self-collected and provider-collected samples from pregnant women attending ANC.
Baseline
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the NG LFA for the detection of NG in vaginal self-collected and provider-collected samples from symptomatic non-pregnant women.
Baseline
To compare the safety of self-collection of vaginal swabs vs provider collection among pregnant women attending ANC and symptomatic non-pregnant women.
Baseline
To assess healthcare workers' acceptability, usability, and preferences regarding the NG LFA systems integration compared to the reference method.
Systems usability score survey and the TFA acceptability survey relating to the NG LFA will be administered to all healthcare workers who are manipulating the NG LFA at month 3 (projected mid-point of participant enrolment) and at month 5.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Pregnant Women Cohort and Symptomatic Women Cohort
This is a cross-sectional, single time-point study with a paired design to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the NG LFA against the Xpert® CT/NG as a reference standard in vaginal samples collected from pregnant women attending ANC and to compare the accuracy and safety of self-collected and provider-collected samples in both non-pregnant symptomatic and pregnant ANC attendees.
Interventions
The clinical claims for the NG LFA are centred around its potential to provide rapid, accurate, and accessible POC diagnosis for NG infection in non-pregnant and pregnant women. It is intended to be used for the detection of NG infections in vaginal swab specimens collected from both symptomatic non-pregnant women and women attending ANC. The NG LFA aims to offer several advantages over traditional testing, including: 1\. Rapid Results: The LFA is designed to provide results within 30 minutes, enabling faster diagnosis and treatment decisions compared to laboratory-based tests that may take hours or days. 2\. Ease of Use: The LFA is intended to be user-friendly, requiring minimal training and resources. This makes it suitable for use in various settings, including primary healthcare facilities and ANC clinics. 3\. Affordability: The LFA is expected to be more cost-effective than current molecular diagnostic methods, potentially expanding access to testing in resource-limited settings.
Eligibility Criteria
1. Pregnant women 2. Symptomatic women 3. Healthcare workers (HCWs) population Systems Usability Score Survey \& TFA Acceptability Survey * HCWs using the NG LFA during month 3 of the study. Focus Group Discussions (FGD) * HCWs actively involved in conducting the study Focus Group Discussions (FGD) - Non-Study Participants * HCWs working at the study site but NOT directly involved in the NG LFA study procedures
You may qualify if:
- ANC population
- Women age ≥18 years
- Pregnant women
- Attending a study site for antenatal care
- Willingness to participate and signed informed consent form (ICF)
You may not qualify if:
- Self-reported use of antimicrobial therapy within 21 days preceding enrolment
- Use of vaginal douche or vaginal product in the previous 24 hours
- Unable to provide specimens for testing
- Non pregnant women age ≥18 years
- Diagnosis of VDS. Diagnosis of VDS will be based on self-reported presence ofsymptoms consistent with VDS, such as increased or abnormal vaginal discharge
- Self-reported use of antimicrobial therapy within 21 days preceding enrolment
- Use of vaginal douche or vaginal product in the previous 24 hours
- Unable to provide specimens for testing
- A medical condition, serious illness, or other condition that could interfere with study procedures or jeopardise participant safety
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
1. Nontyatyambo CHC 2. Empilweni Gompo CHC 3. Duncan Village Day Hospital 4. Grey Gateway Clinic 5. Ndevana Clinic
East London, Eastern Cape, 5247, South Africa
Related Publications (4)
Riddell MA, Vallely LM, Mengi A, Badman SG, Low N, Wand H, Bolnga JW, Babona D, Mola GDL, Wiseman V, Kelly-Hanku A, Homer CSE, Morgan C, Luchters S, Whiley DM, Robinson LJ, Au L, Pukai-Gani I, Laman M, Kariwiga G, Toliman PJ, Batura N, Tabrizi SN, Rogerson SJ, Garland SM, Guy RJ, Peeling RW, Pomat WS, Kaldor JM, Vallely AJB; WANTAIM study group. Point-of-care testing and treatment of sexually transmitted and genital infections to improve birth outcomes in high-burden, low-resource settings (WANTAIM): a pragmatic cluster randomised crossover trial in Papua New Guinea. Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Apr;12(4):e641-e651. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00004-4.
PMID: 38485431BACKGROUNDGleeson B, Piton J, Mazzola L, McHugh S, Bender J, Lear M, Gavrikova T, Van Der Pol B, Daniels B, Osborn J, Dailey P, Ferreyra C. Development of a Novel Fluorescent-Based Lateral Flow Assay for the Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae at the Point of Care. Sex Transm Dis. 2024 Mar 1;51(3):186-191. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001913. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
PMID: 38412465BACKGROUNDPeters RP, Dubbink JH, van der Eem L, Verweij SP, Bos ML, Ouburg S, Lewis DA, Struthers H, McIntyre JA, Morre SA. Cross-sectional study of genital, rectal, and pharyngeal Chlamydia and gonorrhea in women in rural South Africa. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Sep;41(9):564-9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000175.
PMID: 25118973BACKGROUNDPeters RPH, Klausner JD, Mazzola L, Mdingi MM, Jung H, Gigi RMS, Piton J, Daniels J, de Vos L, Adamson PC, Gleeson B, Ferreyra C. Novel lateral flow assay for point-of-care detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in syndromic management settings: a cross-sectional performance evaluation. Lancet. 2024 Feb 17;403(10427):657-664. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02240-7. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
PMID: 38335982BACKGROUND
Biospecimen
Deidentified dry flocked swabs
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mandisa M Mdingi, Master of Public Health
Foundation for Professional Development
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr Birgitta Gleeson, PhD
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2026
First Posted
April 15, 2026
Study Start
September 11, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
April 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04