Master Protocol for Evaluating Multiple Infection Diagnostics for Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Neisseria Gonorrhoeae
MASTERMINDRING
2 other identifiers
observational
3,291
1 country
8
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to learn if a few investigational tests can correctly find the gene mutation (mutant allele gyrA 91F) that predicts ciprofloxacin resistance in clinical specimens that harbor Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The main question the study aims to answer: Can the investigational reflex test find the correct gene mutation (Neisseria gonorrhoeae gyrA 91F or gyrA 91S) as compared to the sequenced result? Specimens that are collected for routine clinical care and harbor Neisseria gonorrhoeae will be evaluated in this study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2025
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 16, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
March 5, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.2 years
February 3, 2025
March 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 1 relative to the sequenced results in urine
Investigational Reflex Test 1 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing. Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.
One day
Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 1 relative to the sequenced results in vaginal swabs
Investigational Reflex Test 1 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing. Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.
One day
Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 1 relative to the sequenced results in pharyngeal swabs
Investigational Reflex Test 1 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing. Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.
One day
Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 2 relative to the sequenced results in urine
Investigational Reflex Test 2 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing. Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.
One day
Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 2 relative to the sequenced results in vaginal swabs
Investigational Reflex Test 2 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing. Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.
One day
Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 2 relative to the sequenced results in pharyngeal swabs
Investigational Reflex Test 2 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing. Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.
One day
Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 3 relative to the sequenced results in urine
Investigational Reflex Test 3 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing. Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.
One day
Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 3 relative to the sequenced results in vaginal swabs
Investigational Reflex Test 3 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing. Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.
One day
Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 3 relative to the sequenced results in pharyngeal swabs
Investigational Reflex Test 3 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing. Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.
One day
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 1 in urine
One day
Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 1 in vaginal swabs
One day
Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 1 in pharyngeal swabs
One day
Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 2 in urine
One day
Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 2 in vaginal swabs
One day
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Urine
Investigational Reflex Test performed to detect the mutant gyrA 91F allele or the wildtype gyrA 91S allele using urine samples.
Vaginal Swab
Investigational Reflex Test performed to detect the mutant gyrA 91F allele or the wildtype gyrA 91S allele using vaginal swabs.
Pharyngeal Swabs
Investigational Reflex Test performed to detect the mutant gyrA 91F allele or the wildtype gyrA 91S allele using pharyngeal swabs.
Interventions
Investigational Reflex Test 2
Investigational Reflex Test 3
Investigational Reflex Test 1
Eligibility Criteria
Clinical specimens from male and females that test positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae
You may qualify if:
- Be N. gonorrhoeae-positive on an FDA-cleared molecular assay
- Have sufficient N. gonorrhoeae-positive specimen volume for testing using the corresponding investigational reflex test and genetic sequencing
- Undergo proper handling and storage conditions
You may not qualify if:
- The N. gonorrhoeae-positive specimen media is not compatible with the investigational reflex test(s) at the laboratory site
- The N. gonorrhoeae-positive specimen is not clearly labeled by the laboratory to link to basic epidemiologic data (age, sex) and source
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)collaborator
- SpeeDx Pty Ltdcollaborator
- Abbottcollaborator
- Seegene USA Inccollaborator
Study Sites (8)
San Francisco Public Health Laboratory
San Francisco, California, 94102, United States
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Mississippi State Department of Public Health
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, United States
Corewell Health
Royal Oak, Missouri, 48073, United States
LabCorp
Durham, North Carolina, 27703, United States
ARUP Laboratories
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States
University of Virginia School of Medicine
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
Molecular Testing Labs
Vancouver, Washington, 98684, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael J. Satlin, MD, MS
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffrey D. Klausner, MD, MPH
University of Southern California - Los Angeles
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Vance G. Fowler, MD, MHS
Duke University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2025
First Posted
February 7, 2025
Study Start
April 16, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- IPD will be available after the primary publication date. There is not end date for the IPD availability.
- Access Criteria
- Only those who have applied to the ARLG and being approved will be able to access the data.
Individual participant data (IPD) including clinical specimen details, investigational testing results, and sequencing results can be shared with other researchers after primary publication. Investigators must apply to the Antibacterial Resistance Group for approval to receive and use the data. Investigators must comply with additional contractual and regulatory obligations.