Adjacent Molar Outcomes After Third Molar Surgery With PRF or Collagen Sponge
PRFvsCOLL-3M
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and an absorbable collagen sponge in extraction sockets following impacted mandibular third molar removal in terms of postoperative clinical healing and periodontal and radiographic outcomes of adjacent second molars. Twenty-nine systemically healthy patients with bilaterally symmetrical impacted mandibular third molars will be included, and a total of 58 extraction sockets will be analyzed. Patients will be randomized using a sealed-envelope method into either the PRF group or the absorbable collagen sponge (Surgispon) group. In this split-mouth design, one side will receive the intervention and the contralateral side will serve as a control. Clinical and periodontal parameters will be recorded postoperatively, and radiographic healing will be evaluated using fractal analysis and lacunarity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 28, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2026
CompletedApril 15, 2026
April 1, 2026
9 months
March 31, 2026
April 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Fractal Dimension and Lacunarity Values for Bone Healing
Radiographic bone healing in the extraction socket will be evaluated using fractal analysis and lacunarity measurements derived from standardized radiographs.
12 weeks postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analog Scale)
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater pain.
3 days postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Facial Swelling Distance (Tragus-Commissure and Tragus-Pogonion Measurements in mm)
posoperatively 3 days
Number of Participants with Alveolar Osteitis (Clinical Diagnosis)
post op 7 days
Mean Periodontal Probing Depth (mm) at Distal Surface of Mandibular Second Molar
post op 7 days
Mean Gingival Recession (mm) at Distal Surface of Mandibular Second Molar
post op 7 days
Gingival Index Score (Löe and Silness Index, 0-3 Scale)
post op 7 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)
EXPERIMENTALn this split-mouth design, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is applied to the extraction socket of the impacted mandibular third molar on the allocated side following tooth removal. The contralateral side serves as an untreated control.
Control (PRF group)
NO INTERVENTIONIn this split-mouth design, no material is applied to the extraction socket on the control side following mandibular third molar removal. Standard postoperative care is provided
Collagen Sponge (Surgispon)
EXPERIMENTALIn this split-mouth design, an absorbable collagen sponge (Spongostan) is placed into the extraction socket on the allocated side following mandibular third molar removal. The contralateral side serves as an untreated control.
Control (Spongostan group)
NO INTERVENTIONIn this split-mouth design, no material is applied to the extraction socket on the control side following mandibular third molar removal. Standard postoperative care is provided.
Interventions
Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is prepared from autologous venous blood by centrifugation without the use of anticoagulants. The obtained fibrin clot is placed into the extraction socket immediately after mandibular third molar removal to promote wound healing and reduce postoperative complications.
An absorbable collagen sponge is placed into the extraction socket immediately after mandibular third molar removal. The material is used to support hemostasis and promote wound healing. No additional biomaterials are applied.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars
- Indication for extraction due to recurrent pericoronitis, non-restorable caries, or periodontal or orthodontic reasons
- Age between 18 and 30 years
- Systemically healthy individuals
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of acute infection or pathology in the surgical region
- Systemic or immunological disease
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- History of chemotherapy or radiotherapy
- Use of anticoagulants, steroids, or medications affecting bone metabolism
- Pregnancy
- Smoking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gazi Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
Ankara, Ankara, 06490, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Kim JW, Seong TW, Cho S, Kim SJ. Randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of absorbable collagen sponge after extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: split-mouth design. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1063-3.
PMID: 32183831RESULTZwittnig K, Kirnbauer B, Truschnegg A, Jakse N, Wolf A, Sokolowski A, Mischak I, Payer M. Effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin in third molar extractions: a randomized controlled split-mouth study. Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Oct 29;28(11):615. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06002-9.
PMID: 39467892RESULTMettes TD, Ghaeminia H, Nienhuijs ME, Perry J, van der Sanden WJ, Plasschaert A. Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD003879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003879.pub3.
PMID: 22696337RESULTChiapasco M, De Cicco L, Marrone G. Side effects and complications associated with third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993 Oct;76(4):412-20. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(93)90005-o.
PMID: 8233418RESULTSusarla SM, Dodson TB. Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Nov;62(11):1363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.214.
PMID: 15510357RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nur Mollaoglu, OMFS PROFESSOR
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ahmet Talha OSMANOĞLU, OMFS RESİDENT
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2026
First Posted
April 15, 2026
Study Start
February 28, 2025
Primary Completion
November 30, 2025
Study Completion
February 28, 2026
Last Updated
April 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share