Clinical Trial to Compare VIM vs PSA Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Essential Tremor
Randomised, Double-Blind, Crossover Clinical Trial Comparing Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Posterior Subthalamic Area Versus the Ventral Intermediate Nucleus of the Thalamus in Essential Tremor
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of both ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) and the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) has shown to be an effective treatment for essential tremor (ET). Characterizing the differences between both targets is necessary. The aim of the study is comparison of efficacy, safety, energy efficiency, neuropsychological status and quality of life of bilateral PSA-DBS vs bilateral VIM-DBS in the treatment of ET. The study hypothesis is that PSA-DBS is not inferior to VIM-DBS in terms of efficacy in controlling tremor, but has superior energy efficiency and safety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 27, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2026
CompletedApril 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
3.6 years
March 20, 2026
April 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in tremor assessed by Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) total score
Improvement from baseline to the end of the VIM-DBS vs PSA-DBS period, assessed as the FTM-TRS total score (0-144 points; higher scores indicate greater tremor severity).
- Preoperative baseline, - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Stimulation efficiency assessed by stimulation amplitudes (mA)
4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)
Stimulation efficiency measured by total electrical energy delivered (TEED)
4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)
Quality of life (QoL) assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
- Preoperative baseline, - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)
Quality of life (QoL) assessed using the Quality of life in essential tremor questionnaire (QUEST)
- Preoperative baseline, - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)
Number and type of stimulation-induced side effects
- 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
VIM-DBS
ACTIVE COMPARATORStimulation delivered to VIM
PSA-DBS
EXPERIMENTALStimulation delivered to PSA
Interventions
Bilateral implantation of octopolar DBS leads covering VIM and PSA
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Confirmed diagnosis of bilateral ET or ET-plus according to the Movement Disorders Society criteria.
- Refractoriness to medication: at least two attempts at medical treatment with at least two groups of different medication (fundamentally propranolol and primidone), which were ineffective (insufficient tremor control or adverse effects).
- Subjects of both sexes, older than 18 years old.
- Sufficient competence to collaborate and comply with the study protocols.
- Ability to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically relevant cognitive decline which may interfere with the study.
- Clinically relevant active psychiatric disorder.
- Contraindication for general surgery or bilateral DBS.
- Unsuitable electrode location according to neuroimaging.
- Participation in other interventional study.
- Cerebral atrophy (width of the third ventricle \>10 mm) or other anatomical anomalies that would interfere with optimal stereotactic localization.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Neurotraumatology and Rehabilitation Hospital)
Granada, Granada, 18013, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Barbe MT, Reker P, Hamacher S, Franklin J, Kraus D, Dembek TA, Becker J, Steffen JK, Allert N, Wirths J, Dafsari HS, Voges J, Fink GR, Visser-Vandewalle V, Timmermann L. DBS of the PSA and the VIM in essential tremor: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Neurology. 2018 Aug 7;91(6):e543-e550. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005956. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
PMID: 29970404BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Majed Jouma Katati, PhD
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Granada University (Granada, Spain). Department of Neurosurgery, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Granada, Spain)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francisco Escamilla Sevilla
Department of Neurology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Granada, Spain)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Investigadora colaboradora, doctoranda.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2026
First Posted
April 13, 2026
Study Start
May 27, 2020
Primary Completion
December 20, 2023
Study Completion
July 24, 2024
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data are not publicly available due to the risk of breached patient confidentiality