NCT07526155

Brief Summary

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of both ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) and the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) has shown to be an effective treatment for essential tremor (ET). Characterizing the differences between both targets is necessary. The aim of the study is comparison of efficacy, safety, energy efficiency, neuropsychological status and quality of life of bilateral PSA-DBS vs bilateral VIM-DBS in the treatment of ET. The study hypothesis is that PSA-DBS is not inferior to VIM-DBS in terms of efficacy in controlling tremor, but has superior energy efficiency and safety.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
11

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 27, 2020

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 24, 2024

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2026

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 13, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Essential tremorDeep brain stimulationPosterior subthalamic areaVentral intermediate nucleus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Improvement in tremor assessed by Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) total score

    Improvement from baseline to the end of the VIM-DBS vs PSA-DBS period, assessed as the FTM-TRS total score (0-144 points; higher scores indicate greater tremor severity).

    - Preoperative baseline, - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Stimulation efficiency assessed by stimulation amplitudes (mA)

    4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)

  • Stimulation efficiency measured by total electrical energy delivered (TEED)

    4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)

  • Quality of life (QoL) assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    - Preoperative baseline, - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)

  • Quality of life (QoL) assessed using the Quality of life in essential tremor questionnaire (QUEST)

    - Preoperative baseline, - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)

  • Number and type of stimulation-induced side effects

    - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

VIM-DBS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Stimulation delivered to VIM

Device: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)

PSA-DBS

EXPERIMENTAL

Stimulation delivered to PSA

Device: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)

Interventions

Bilateral implantation of octopolar DBS leads covering VIM and PSA

PSA-DBSVIM-DBS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of bilateral ET or ET-plus according to the Movement Disorders Society criteria.
  • Refractoriness to medication: at least two attempts at medical treatment with at least two groups of different medication (fundamentally propranolol and primidone), which were ineffective (insufficient tremor control or adverse effects).
  • Subjects of both sexes, older than 18 years old.
  • Sufficient competence to collaborate and comply with the study protocols.
  • Ability to provide informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinically relevant cognitive decline which may interfere with the study.
  • Clinically relevant active psychiatric disorder.
  • Contraindication for general surgery or bilateral DBS.
  • Unsuitable electrode location according to neuroimaging.
  • Participation in other interventional study.
  • Cerebral atrophy (width of the third ventricle \>10 mm) or other anatomical anomalies that would interfere with optimal stereotactic localization.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Neurotraumatology and Rehabilitation Hospital)

Granada, Granada, 18013, Spain

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Barbe MT, Reker P, Hamacher S, Franklin J, Kraus D, Dembek TA, Becker J, Steffen JK, Allert N, Wirths J, Dafsari HS, Voges J, Fink GR, Visser-Vandewalle V, Timmermann L. DBS of the PSA and the VIM in essential tremor: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Neurology. 2018 Aug 7;91(6):e543-e550. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005956. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

    PMID: 29970404BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Essential Tremor

Interventions

Deep Brain Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Movement DisordersCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Majed Jouma Katati, PhD

    Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Granada University (Granada, Spain). Department of Neurosurgery, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Granada, Spain)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Francisco Escamilla Sevilla

    Department of Neurology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Granada, Spain)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Investigadora colaboradora, doctoranda.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2026

First Posted

April 13, 2026

Study Start

May 27, 2020

Primary Completion

December 20, 2023

Study Completion

July 24, 2024

Last Updated

April 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The data are not publicly available due to the risk of breached patient confidentiality

Locations