Perceptual Decision Making Under Conditions of Visual Uncertainty
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this proposal the investigators have three Specific Aims using human patient populations as model systems; 1) identify a role for the Basal Ganglia (BG) in perceptual decision making; 2) determine whether the Basal Ganglia contribute to decision making under conditions of visual uncertainty; 3) determine whether the cerebellum plays a role in perceptual decision-making under conditions of visual uncertainty. The investigators designed experiments using healthy humans and humans with diseases known to affect the Basal Ganglia and the cerebellum, Parkinson's Disease, dystonia and non-dystonic cerebellar damage. With this approach the investigators will test the following hypotheses: 1) Patients with Parkinson's Disease and dystonia will have more difficulty than healthy controls making perceptual decisions when faced with sensory uncertainty; when sensory information is certain, patients will show improved decision-making but will still be impaired relative to healthy humans. Hypothesis 2: If ambiguous sensory information is aided by prior information, patients with Parkinson's Disease and dystonia will be unable to use the prior (bias/memory) information to inform their decisions. Hypothesis 3: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of Basal Ganglia structures will improve the ability of patients to use prior information to inform their decisions when faced with sensory uncertainty. Hypothesis 4: Both cholinergic and dopaminergic medical therapies will improve the ability of patients to use prior information to inform their decisions. Hypothesis 5: Patients with non-dystonic cerebellar damage will be similar to healthy controls in performance of a perceptual decision making task in conditions of visual uncertainty. The overarching framework of this application is that the same mechanisms (D1 striatal synaptic plasticity) that operate in reward learning play a role in learning and using stimulus priors in a perceptual decision-making task when faced with uncertainty. Because Parkinson's Disease and dystonia share deficits in striatal circuitry, the patient deficits on this task will be similar. Because non-dystonic cerebellar patients do not have dysfunction of striatal circuits, they will show no deficits in the ability to use stimulus priors to guide choices in uncertain conditions. In the event these patients do show deficits, this is will provide evidence for an unexplored role for the cerebellum in perceptual decision-making.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedDecember 18, 2015
December 1, 2015
2.7 years
April 23, 2013
December 17, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Choice performance - % correct responses out of total number of trials
data from each subject will be assessed at the end of each session to monitor and measure outcome measures.
at the end of each testing session - 2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Reaction Time to make a choice - measured in milliseconds
at the end of each testing session - 2 hours
Study Arms (1)
Deep Brain Stimulator
OTHERSome of our subjects that participate to the study have Deep Brain Stimulation implanted. They will perform the behavioral task twice, with the stimulation ON or OFF.
Interventions
Patients with DBS will participate to the study both when the stimulation is off and on.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Group 1 - Age and Sex matched healthy controls:
- Age 18-80 Years
- Group 2 - Patients with Parkinson's Disease - No DBS:
- "on meds" and "off meds" (tested in separate sessions) - total of 2 sessions
- Age 45-80 Years
- Unified PD rating scale (UPDRS)
- Mini mental health Status (MMHS)
- Group 3 - Patients with Parkinson's Disease already consented for DBS (STN):
- Age 45-80 Years
- Unified PD rating scale (UPDRS)
- Mini mental health Status (MMHS)
- Group 4 - Patients with Parkinson's Disease already consented for DBS (GPi):
- Age 45-80 Years
- Unified PD rating scale (UPDRS)
- Mini mental health Status (MMHS)
- +20 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Visual impairment or ocular motility disorder Inability to sit for the 30 minute task plus 20-30 minute instruction time, setup, and wait time.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, Los Angeleslead
- The Dana Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Neuroscience Research Building
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michele Basso, PhD
University of California, Los Angeles
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2013
First Posted
May 3, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
December 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12