Early Functional Response as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Hand Rehabilitation: A Prospective Feasibility Study Using a Digital Monitoring System
HANDREHPREDICT
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study investigates whether early changes observed during the first weeks of hand and upper extremity rehabilitation can predict patient outcomes months later. In rehabilitation practice, clinicians make numerous decisions each session regarding exercise type, frequency, duration, and treatment approach. Most of these decisions are currently made without systematic longitudinal data. This study addresses three fundamental questions using data collected during routine clinical care: (1) Can the rate of improvement in the first weeks of treatment predict functional status months later, across both session-based and milestone-based time points? (2) Are there meaningfully different recovery profiles among hand rehabilitation patients? (3) Is there measurable variation in clinical decision-making among patients with similar profiles, and does this variation relate to outcomes? A digital patient monitoring platform developed by the principal investigator, a physiotherapist and academic researcher specializing in hand rehabilitation serves as the data collection infrastructure. The platform records standard clinical assessment measures in a structured format and has been in active clinical use at Hacettepe University prior to this study. For research purposes, the system has been expanded to include structured capture of patient-reported outcomes, patient global impression of change, treatment protocol coding, home exercise adherence, and automated calculation of early response metrics. This is a 12-month prospective observational cohort study enrolling a minimum of 60 patients. Data are stored securely on the university's institutional network. Patients are anonymized using identification codes. The study is subject to Hacettepe University Ethics Committee approval and participant informed consent. Findings are expected to generate evidence supporting data-driven clinical decision-making in rehabilitation and to provide a feasibility foundation for a larger multi-center study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
April 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
7 months
April 3, 2026
April 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Feasibility: PROM Data Completeness
Proportion of rehabilitation sessions with complete PROM data entries throughout the study period. Success criterion: ≥85% completeness rate.
Throughout the 12-month study period
Model M1: Session-Based Early Response → Session 12
Predictive Power of Sessions 1-4 Functional Change (ΔS₁-₄) for Session 12 Outcome Association between the early response score (ΔS₁-₄ = mean change in primary PROM per session during sessions 1-4) and primary PROM score at session 12, assessed via linear regression and ROC curve analysis (AUC). Baseline PROM entered as covariate.
Baseline (session 1) to session 12 (approximately 4-8 weeks)
Model M2: Month 1 Change → Month 3 Outcome
Predictive Power of 1-Month Change (Δ₀→₁) for 3-Month Outcome Association between change in primary PROM from baseline to 1-month assessment and PROM score at 3 months, with covariate adjustment for baseline severity. Tests whether early-period change forecasts mid-term outcomes.
Baseline to 3-month standardized assessment
Model M4: Month 1 Change → Month 6 Outcome
Predictive Power of 1-Month Change (Δ₀→₁) for 6-Month Outcome Association between change in primary PROM from baseline to 1-month assessment and PROM score at 6 months. This is the primary cascaded prediction model: can a single early assessment predict medium-to-long-term functional outcomes? Findings will inform evidence-based treatment modification thresholds.
Baseline to 6-month standardized assessment
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Model M3: Month 3 Change → Month 6 Outcome
Baseline to 6-month standardized assessment
Recovery Profile Classification
Baseline through session 12 (~4-8 weeks)
Clinical Decision Variation
Throughout the 12-month study period
Feasibility: Clinician Acceptance
At 3 months and 12 months
MCID Responder Rate
Monthly from baseline to 12 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Hand Rehabilitation Cohort
Adults with hand and upper extremity pathologies undergoing rehabilitation under the clinical responsibility of the principal investigator at Hacettepe University Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation. Consecutive sampling: all eligible patients enrolled in order of presentation until minimum sample size is reached.
Eligibility Criteria
Adults with hand and upper extremity pathologies under the clinical responsibility of the principal investigator at Hacettepe University Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Turkey. Consecutive, non-probability sampling applied: all eligible patients enrolled in order of presentation until minimum n=60 is reached
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Hand or upper extremity pathology requiring rehabilitation, including but not limited to: flexor or extensor tendon injuries, peripheral nerve injuries or compression syndromes (including carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome), distal radius fractures, metacarpal or phalangeal fractures, joint injuries and instabilities, arthropathy (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis), trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis, trigger finger, Dupuytren's disease, DeQuervain tenosynovitis, lateral epicondylitis and post-surgical upper extremity conditions
- Under clinical responsibility of the principal investigator at the Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University
- Expected to attend minimum 8 rehabilitation sessions
- Able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Active psychiatric illness precluding participation or completion of assessment tools
- Severe cognitive impairment precluding understanding of patient-reported outcome measures
- Literacy difficulties preventing self-completion of questionnaires
- Concurrent enrollment in another interventional clinical study
- Refusal to provide written informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hacettepe University Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2026
First Posted
April 13, 2026
Study Start
June 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be publicly shared to protect privacy. Aggregate data and complete R analysis code will be made available as supplementary material upon publication. De-identified study data may be made available upon reasonable written request to the corresponding author following publication.