Telerehabilitation Program in Lumbar Disc Herniation
Development of a Telerehabilitation-Based Exercise and Monitoring Program and Its Effectiveness Compared With a Brochure-Based Home Exercise Program in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to develop an asynchronous, web-based telerehabilitation exercise and monitoring program and to compare its effectiveness with a traditional brochure-based home exercise program in patients with lumbar disc herniation. The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial including 46 participants who were allocated into two groups: a telerehabilitation group and a brochure-based exercise group. Both groups participated in a structured 4-week home exercise program. The telerehabilitation group received exercise guidance and follow-up through a web-based digital platform, which enabled remote monitoring of exercise adherence and patient-reported outcomes. The brochure group performed the same exercises using printed instructional materials. Participants were evaluated before and after the intervention using standardized and validated assessment tools, including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability, the SF-12 for quality of life, and tests for static and dynamic lumbar muscle strength and endurance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2026
CompletedMarch 30, 2026
March 1, 2026
1 month
March 19, 2026
March 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Pain intensity assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores represent greater pain severity. The assessment includes overall pain, pain at rest, pain during activity, and night pain. \[Time Frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks\]Pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores represent greater pain severity. The assessment includes overall pain, pain at rest, pain during activity, and night pain.
Baseline and after 4 weeks
Functional disability (ODI)
Functional disability assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Functional disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a questionnaire consisting of 10 items scored from 0 to 5, with a total score ranging from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Baseline and after 4 weeks
Quality of life (SF-12)
Quality of life assessed by the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Quality of life measured using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), which generates physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Baseline and after 4 weeks
Static trunk muscle endurance
Static trunk muscle endurance assessed using Diener's trunk muscle test Static trunk muscle endurance measured using Diener's (1992) trunk muscle test, expressed as the duration (seconds) the participant maintains the trunk flexion position until the inferior angle of the scapula lifts off the surface. The maximum score is 30 seconds. Higher values indicate greater trunk muscle endurance.
Baseline and after 4 weeks
Dynamic trunk muscle endurance
Dynamic trunk muscle endurance assessed using Diener's trunk muscle test Dynamic trunk muscle endurance measured using Diener's (1992) trunk muscle test, expressed as the number of complete trunk flexion repetitions performed within 30 seconds. Higher values indicate greater trunk muscle endurance.
Baseline and after 4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Telerehabilitation Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received a web-based telerehabilitation exercise and monitoring program including video-guided exercises, remote monitoring of adherence, and asynchronous follow-up via a digital platform.
Brochure Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received a brochure-based home exercise program including printed instructions and visual materials, with initial face-to-face instruction and no remote monitoring.
Interventions
Participants performed a structured home exercise program delivered through a web-based telerehabilitation platform. The program included video-guided exercises, written instructions, and asynchronous remote monitoring. Participants recorded their exercise sessions, and physiotherapists monitored adherence and provided feedback through the digital system. The intervention was conducted for 4 weeks, 3 days per week, with 3 sets of 10 repetitions for each exercise.
Participants performed the same structured home exercise program using printed brochures that included visual and written instructions. Exercises were initially demonstrated face-to-face, and participants continued independently at home without remote monitoring. The program was applied for 4 weeks, 3 days per week, with 3 sets of 10 repetitions for each exercise.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 18 and 65 years
- Diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation by a specialist physician
- Presence of bulging or protrusion stage lumbar disc herniation
- Willing to participate and provide informed consent
- Having basic smartphone or computer skills and access to the internet (for the telerehabilitation group
You may not qualify if:
- History of spinal surgery
- Presence of extruded or sequestered lumbar disc herniation
- Visual or hearing impairment that may affect participation
- Presence of spinal tumors
- Communication or cognitive problems preventing participation
- Inability to understand Turkish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Necmettin Erbakan University
Konya, Meram, 42090, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessments were conducted by a physiotherapist who was blinded to group allocation. Participants and care providers were not blinded due to the nature of the intervention.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assist Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2026
First Posted
March 30, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Study Completion
September 1, 2024
Last Updated
March 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be publicly shared due to privacy and confidentiality concerns. The data contain potentially identifiable information and are protected under ethical and institutional regulations. However, de-identified data may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.