Efficacy and Safety of 20% and 100% Autologous Serum Eye Drops in Patients With Severe Dry Eye Disease (AST)
AST
2 other identifiers
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled crossover trial was conducted in patients with severe dry eye syndrome. Topical treatment with autologous serum eye drops (ASED) diluted at 20%, undiluted ASED and conventional preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) were compared as a treatment for severe dry eye disease. The primary outcome measure was assessment of ocular symptoms using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were Schirmer 1 test, best-corrected visual acuity (BVCA), corneal fluorescein and conjunctival lissamine green staining using the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Ocular Surface Staining (SICCA OSS) score, tear break up time (TBUT), conjunctival injection score (CIS) and Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) grading. Additionally, serum and tear cytokine analysis and microbiological cultures were performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 30, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2026
CompletedMarch 13, 2026
March 1, 2026
3 years
March 9, 2026
March 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in participant-reported severity and/or frequency of dry eye-related symptoms based on a validated patient symptom questionnaire (Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, OSDI)
OSDI
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change from baseline in ocular staining with fluorescein and lissamine green according to the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Ocular Staining Score (SICCA OSS)
8 weeks
Change from baseline in Schirmer 1 tear production test (mm)
8 weeks
Change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, Snellen)
8 weeks
Change from baseline in tear film break-up time at the slit lamp (tBUT, sec)
8 weeks
Change from baseline in non-invasive break-up-time (NiBUT) using anterior segment ocular coherence tomography (OCT) (sec)
8 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Sequence 1: T1-T2-T3
EXPERIMENTALAfter a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Sequence 2: T1-T3-T2
EXPERIMENTALAfter a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Sequence 3: T2-T3-T1
EXPERIMENTALAfter a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Sequence 4: T2-T1-T3
EXPERIMENTALAfter a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Sequence 5: T3-T1-T2
EXPERIMENTALAfter a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Sequence 6: T3-T2-T1
EXPERIMENTALAfter a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Interventions
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A. Tear break-up time (tBUT) as a measure of tear film quality \< 5 seconds B. Positive corneal and conjunctival staining quantified according to the SICCA OSS scale C. Schirmer 1 test score \< 5 mm/5 min (without anesthesia)
You may not qualify if:
- A. Inability to complete the study protocol, including study-specific procedures.
- B. Inability to understand the Dutch-language ICF and/or unwillingness or inability to provide signed informed consent.
- C. History of non-compliance with the proposed therapy D. Presence of known severe anemia based on medical history E. Hypersensitivity to the proposed treatment F. Pregnancy G. Age \<18 years H. In the opinion of the investigator, the subject is not suitable for participation in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium
Related Publications (6)
Kojima T, Ishida R, Dogru M, Goto E, Matsumoto Y, Kaido M, Tsubota K. The effect of autologous serum eyedrops in the treatment of severe dry eye disease: a prospective randomized case-control study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;139(2):242-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.040.
PMID: 15733983BACKGROUNDUrzua CA, Vasquez DH, Huidobro A, Hernandez H, Alfaro J. Randomized double-blind clinical trial of autologous serum versus artificial tears in dry eye syndrome. Curr Eye Res. 2012 Aug;37(8):684-8. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.674609. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
PMID: 22670856BACKGROUNDCelebi AR, Ulusoy C, Mirza GE. The efficacy of autologous serum eye drops for severe dry eye syndrome: a randomized double-blind crossover study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;252(4):619-26. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2599-1. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
PMID: 24566903BACKGROUNDTananuvat N, Daniell M, Sullivan LJ, Yi Q, McKelvie P, McCarty DJ, Taylor HR. Controlled study of the use of autologous serum in dry eye patients. Cornea. 2001 Nov;20(8):802-6. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200111000-00005.
PMID: 11685055BACKGROUNDNoble BA, Loh RS, MacLennan S, Pesudovs K, Reynolds A, Bridges LR, Burr J, Stewart O, Quereshi S. Comparison of autologous serum eye drops with conventional therapy in a randomised controlled crossover trial for ocular surface disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 May;88(5):647-52. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.026211.
PMID: 15090417BACKGROUNDBachtalia K, Plakitsi A, Voudouri A, Terzidou C, Dalianis G, Kopsinis G, Palioura S. The Effect of Autologous Serum Tears 50% on the Ocular Surface of Patients With Severe Dry Eye Disease due to Sjogren Syndrome: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Contralateral Eye Study. Cornea. 2025 Jan 14;44(7):856-865. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003795.
PMID: 39808128BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dimitri Roels, MD
Department of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital Belgium
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The examining ophthalmologist was blinded to the type of eyedrops given to each patient in the trial. Due to differences in color and viscosity of the different eye drops, complete blinding of the study patient was deemed impossible. All data were collected in REDCap by an unblinded study coordinator. The database was locked and the blinding lifted only after the Database Lock Approval Form had been signed by the principal investigator following completion of the entire study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2026
First Posted
March 13, 2026
Study Start
November 30, 2021
Primary Completion
November 14, 2024
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
March 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share