NCT07455370

Brief Summary

The goal of this descriptive study is to examine levels of moral distress (MD), moral injury (MI), \& post-traumatic stress (PTS) levels among nursing staff at Mayo Clinic. The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  1. 1.Determine the levels of MD, MI, and PTS symptoms experienced by nurses who participate in the study.
  2. 2.Evaluate differences in MD, MI, and PTS symptoms by setting, specialties, and geographic locations.
  3. 3.Examine demographic and professional characteristics that are associated with high levels of MD, MI and PTS.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21,300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
3mo left

Started Mar 2026

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress44%
Mar 2026Aug 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 23, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 3, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 6, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

March 20, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

February 23, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Moral InjuryMoral DistressPost-Traumatic StressNurse WellbeingNurse burnout

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Measure of Moral Distress-Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) Score

    The MMD-HP (Measure of Moral Distress-Healthcare Professionals) is a 27-item moral distress scale. A composite score is computed for items 1 - 25 and is obtained by multiplying the frequency scores (0 = Never to 4 = Very Frequently scale) and the distress scores (0 = None to 4 = Very Distressing scale) for each item; the products of these can range from 0 - 16. Higher scores indicate a greater deal of moral distress.

    Baseline

  • Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) score

    The Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) is a 14-item self-reported survey divided into two subscales-shame-related and trust-violation related. Both the shame and trust-violated subscales are seven items per subscale. Respondents are asked to indicate how strongly they agree with each statement in the past month using a 5 point Likert scale where 0 = Strongly Disagree and 4 = Strongly Agree. The total score range for each subscale is 0 - 28, and the overall score range is 0 - 56. Symptom severity is categorized as follows: 14 - 28 indicates mild moral injury, 29 - 42 indicates moderate moral injury, and 35 - 56 indicates severe moral injury.

    Baseline

  • Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PCL-5) score

    The PCL - 5 (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PSTD) Checklist) is a 20-item self-reported survey that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD. Respondents are asked to indicate the frequency that each item occurs on a 5 point Likert scale where 0 = Not at All and 4 = Extremely. The total score is the sum of all 20 questions, with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of PTSD.

    Baseline

Study Arms (1)

Mayo Clinic Nurses

Mayo Clinic Department of Nursing staff across the enterprise including advanced practice nurses, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and nursing support/unlicensed staff.

Other: Surveys

Interventions

SurveysOTHER

Participants will complete an electronic survey containing the Measure of Moral Distress- Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP), Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) including functional outcome measures adapted from the Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning, The PCL-5 Checklist for DSM-5 (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PSTD) Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5)) (PCL-5), and the Well-Being Index (WBI), additionally including a demographic questionnaire with wellbeing questions.

Mayo Clinic Nurses

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Mayo Clinic Department of Nursing Staff across all Mayo Clinic sites, including: Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota; Mayo Clinic in Arizona; Mayo Clinic in Florida; and Mayo Clinic Health System sites in the midwest.

You may qualify if:

  • Mayo Clinic Department of Nursing Staff including:
  • Registered nurses
  • Licensed practical nurses
  • Nursing support staff (including roles such as patient care assistants, patient care specialists, medical assistants, and nurse technicians)

You may not qualify if:

  • Social workers
  • Chaplains
  • Unit coordinators
  • Other staff who do not support direct patient care but are within the nursing department
  • Other employees outside the Department of Nursing

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Mayo Clinic

Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, 32250, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Related Publications (26)

  • Dyrbye, L. N., Johnson, P. O., Johnson, L. M., Satele, D. V., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2018). Efficacy of the Well-Being Index to Identify Distress and Well-Being in U.S. Nurses. Nurs Res, 67(6), 447-455. https://doi.org/10.1097/nnr.0000000000000313

    BACKGROUND
  • Wortmann JH, Jordan AH, Weathers FW, Resick PA, Dondanville KA, Hall-Clark B, et al. Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(11):1392-403.

    BACKGROUND
  • Houle, S. A., Ein, N., Gervasio, J., Plouffe, R. A., Litz, B. T., Carleton, R. N., Hansen, K. T., Liu, J. J. W., Ashbaugh, A. R., Callaghan, W., Thompson, M. M., Easterbrook, B., Smith-MacDonald, L., Rodrigues, S., Bélanger, S. A. H., Bright, K., Lanius, R. A., Baker, C., Younger, W.,…Nazarov, A. (2024). Measuring moral distress and moral injury: A systematic review and content analysis of existing scales. Clin Psychol Rev, 108, 102377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102377

    BACKGROUND
  • Booth, A. T., & Robinson, K. L. System-wide assessment using the Measure of Moral Distress - Healthcare professionals. Nursing Ethics, 0(0), 09697330251324296. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251324296

    BACKGROUND
  • D'Alessandro-Lowe AM, Patel H, Easterbrook B, Ritchie K, Brown A, Xue Y, et al. The independent and combined impact of moral injury and moral distress on post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2299661.

    BACKGROUND
  • Austin CL, Saylor R, Finley PJ. Moral distress in physicians and nurses: Impact on professional quality of life and turnover. Psychol Trauma. 2017;9(4):399-406.

    BACKGROUND
  • Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015;28(6):489-98.

    BACKGROUND
  • Schuster M, Dwyer PA. Post-traumatic stress disorder in nurses: An integrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(15-16):2769-87.

    BACKGROUND
  • Brennan CJ, Roberts C, Cole JC. Prevalence of occupational moral injury and post-traumatic embitterment disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2024;14(2):e071776.

    BACKGROUND
  • Weber MC, Smith AJ, Jones RT, Holmes GA, Johnson AL, Patrick RNC, et al. Moral injury and psychosocial functioning in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Serv. 2023;20(1):19-29.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ehman AC, Smith AJ, Wright H, Langenecker SA, Benight CC, Maguen S, et al. Exposure to potentially morally injurious events and mental health outcomes among frontline workers affected by the coronavirus pandemic. Psychol Trauma. 2023;15(3):524-35.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hines SE, Chin KH, Glick DR, Wickwire EM. Trends in Moral Injury, Distress, and Resilience Factors among Healthcare Workers at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2).

    BACKGROUND
  • Papazoglou K, Chopko B. The Role of Moral Suffering (Moral Distress and Moral Injury) in Police Compassion Fatigue and PTSD: An Unexplored Topic. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1999.

    BACKGROUND
  • Maguen S, Litz BT. Moral Injury in Veterans of War. PTSD Research Quarterly (RQ). 2012;23(1):1-3.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gibbons SW, Shafer M, Hickling EJ, Ramsey G. How do deployed health care providers experience moral injury? Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2013;3(3):247-59.

    BACKGROUND
  • Litz BT, Stein N, Delaney E, Lebowitz L, Nash WP, Silva C, Maguen S. Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: a preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29(8):695-706.

    BACKGROUND
  • Shay J. Achilles in Vietnam: Combat Trauma and the Undoing of Character. New York, NY: Scribner; 1994. 246 p.

    BACKGROUND
  • Yan GW. The Invisible Wound: Moral Injury and Its Impact on the Health of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom Veterans. Mil Med. 2016;181(5):451-8.

    BACKGROUND
  • Horesh D, Brown AD. Traumatic stress in the age of COVID-19: A call to close critical gaps and adapt to new realities. Psychol Trauma. 2020;12(4):331-5.

    BACKGROUND
  • Wingfield T, Taegtmeyer M. Healthcare workers and Coronavirus: Behind the stiff upper lip we are highly vulnerable Waltham, MA: The Conversation; 2020 [Available from: https://theconversation.com/healthcare-workers-and-coronavirus-behind-the-stiff-upper-lip-we-are-highly-vulnerable-133864.

    BACKGROUND
  • Agazio J, Goodman P. Making the hard decisions: Ethical care decisions in wartime nursing practice. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65(5s):S92-s9.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gibbons SW, Shafer MA, Hickling L, Edward J, Benedeck DM. Combat health care providers and resiliency: Adaptive coping mechanisms during and after deployment. Psychol Serv. 2014;11(2):192-9.

    BACKGROUND
  • American Association of Critical Care Nurses. AACN Public Policy Position Statement 2001. Aliso Viejo, CA: American Association of Critical Care Nurses; 2001.

    BACKGROUND
  • Epstein EG, Whitehead PB, Prompahakul C, Thacker LR, Hamric AB. Enhancing Understanding of Moral Distress: The Measure of Moral Distress for Health Care Professionals. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019;10(2):113-24.

    BACKGROUND
  • American Association of Critical Care Nurses. Moral distress public policy position statement. Aliso Viejo, CA: American Association of Critical Care Nurses; 2008.

    BACKGROUND
  • Adia, 2023: Brennan, C. J., Roberts, C., & Cole, J. C. (2024). Prevalence of occupational moral injury and post-traumatic embitterment disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 14(2), e071776. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071776

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticPsychological Well-Being

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress Disorders, TraumaticTrauma and Stressor Related DisordersMental DisordersPersonal SatisfactionBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Melissa A Wilson, PhD

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Cindy Tofthagen, PhD

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Associate Consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2026

First Posted

March 6, 2026

Study Start

March 3, 2026

Primary Completion

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations