Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behavior During School Recess Among Adolescents
Effectiveness of an Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behavior During School Recess Among Adolescents: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
1,000
1 country
12
Brief Summary
This cluster randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of an 8-week, school-based behavioural intervention grounded in the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework in promoting interruption of sedentary behaviour during school breaks among adolescents. Twelve primary and secondary schools in China, were recruited and randomly allocated (at the school level) to either an intervention group or a control group to minimise contamination and support pragmatic delivery within the school setting. Schools assigned to the intervention group implemented a multi-component programme comprising educational materials, teacher-delivered guidance, peer reminders, and health lectures, whereas control schools continued their usual routines without receiving intervention materials. The primary outcome was interruption of sedentary behaviour during school breaks assessed using self-reported measures. Secondary outcomes included physical activity levels, emotional and behavioural problems, executive function, and psychological factors related to behaviour regulation, such as motivation, planning, and habit. Findings from this trial are intended to inform the development and implementation of feasible, theory-informed school strategies to reduce sedentary behaviour during school breaks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2026
CompletedMarch 5, 2026
February 1, 2026
10 months
February 27, 2026
February 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Interruption of sedentary behaviour during school breaks
Interruption of sedentary behaviour during routine school breaks (between lessons; excluding longer "big recess" periods) was assessed over the past 7 school days using a single-item self-report measure adapted from the Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire (SITBRQ) for the school context. Students reported the average time spent standing or walking to interrupt sitting during a typical routine class break (0 min, ≤5 min, \>5-\<10 min, ≥10 min); higher categories indicate greater break-time sedentary interruption. The item wording was modified to reflect school break periods while retaining the original construct of sedentary break behaviour.
Baseline, Week 8 (Post-intervention), Week 16 (Follow-up, 8 weeks post-intervention), and Week 24 (Follow-up, 16 weeks post-intervention).
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Self-reported physical activity
Baseline, Week 8 (Post-intervention), Week 16 (Follow-up, 8 weeks post-intervention), and Week 24 (Follow-up, 16 weeks post-intervention).
Emotional and behavioural problems
Baseline, Week 8 (Post-intervention), Week 16 (Follow-up, 8 weeks post-intervention), and Week 24 (Follow-up, 16 weeks post-intervention).
Executive function
Baseline, Week 8 (Post-intervention), Week 16 (Follow-up, 8 weeks post-intervention), and Week 24 (Follow-up, 16 weeks post-intervention).
Affective attitude toward interrupting sedentary behaviour during school breaks
Baseline, Week 8 (Post-intervention), Week 16 (Follow-up, 8 weeks post-intervention), and Week 24 (Follow-up, 16 weeks post-intervention)
Instrumental attitude toward interrupting sedentary behaviour during school breaks
Baseline, Week 8 (Post-intervention), Week 16 (Follow-up, 8 weeks post-intervention), and Week 24 (Follow-up, 16 weeks post-intervention)
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Process evaluation variables
Week 8 (Post-intervention)
Study Arms (2)
Usual Pratice Control
NO INTERVENTIONSchools allocated to the control group continued their usual school routines during the 8-week study period and did not receive any intervention materials or behaviour-change components related to sedentary behaviour interruption. No additional guidance, reminders, or educational materials were provided. Data collection procedures were conducted in the same manner as in the intervention group.
Sedentary Interruption Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention was grounded in the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework and targeted behaviour regulation processes relevant to sedentary interruption. Intervention components included: 1) Weekly educational leaflets providing information on the health risks of prolonged sedentary behaviour and practical strategies to interrupt sitting during school breaks. 2) Guidance delivered by physical education teachers, reinforcing key messages and encouraging active break behaviours. 3) Peer reminders were delivered during school breaks by class-appointed student PE representatives-one student per class nominated by the PE teacher (typically a high-performing student in PE) to support the organization and promotion of physical activity. 4) Health lectures delivered by members of the research team to enhance awareness and motivation related to sedentary behaviour interruption.
Interventions
A multi-component, school-based behavioural program implemented over 8 weeks to promote interruption of sedentary behaviour during school breaks. The program was informed by the Multi-Process Action Control framework and designed to support behaviour regulation related to break-time sedentary interruption. 1. Educational leaflets (weekly): brief printed materials distributed once per week, providing information on sedentary behaviour and practical strategies to interrupt sitting during school breaks. 2. Teacher guidance: physical education (PE) teachers provided brief guidance and reinforcement of key messages during routine school activities/classes, encouraging students to interrupt sedentary time during breaks. 3. Peer reminders during school breaks: reminders were delivered by class-appointed student PE representatives. 4. Health lectures: health lectures were delivered by members of the research team during the intervention period to support awareness and and motivation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Students aged 10-17 years
- Enrolled in participating primary or secondary schools
- Able to participate in regular school physical activities and daily routines
- Able to understand and complete study questionnaires
- Willing to comply with study procedures
- Written informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed medical conditions that contraindicate participation in physical activity
- Physical disabilities, injuries, or health conditions that limit normal participation in school-based activities
- Participation in other structured physical activity or sedentary behavior intervention programs during the study period
- Cognitive or language difficulties that preclude understanding of study procedures or completion of questionnaires
- Inability or unwillingness to comply with study procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Jingshi Liyun Experimental School
Foshan, Guangdong, 528300, China
Dongping Primary School, Foshan
Foshan, Guangdong, 528315, China
Zhixin Middle School (Pazhou Experimental School)
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China
Experimental Secondary School of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510420, China
Gaotangshi Primary School
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510520, China
Guangdong University of Education (Panyu Affiliated Junior Secondary School)
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511436, China
Overseas Chinese Town Primary School
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518053, China
Lin Weimin Memorial Primary School
Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519040, China
Lihe Primary School
Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519085, China
Haikou No.9 Middle School
Haikou, Hainan, 570102, China
Pingyao Middle School - Junior High Division
Jinzhong, Shanxi, 031100, China
Pingyao Middle School - Primary Division
Jinzhou, Shanxi, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ru ZHANG
South China Normal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the school-level implementation of the intervention, it was not possible to blind school administrators, teachers, and students to group allocation. However, outcome assessors were kept blinded to the group assignment. Throughout the data collection process, participants were instructed not to disclose their group allocation.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor ; Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2026
First Posted
March 5, 2026
Study Start
October 8, 2025
Primary Completion
July 30, 2026
Study Completion
July 30, 2026
Last Updated
March 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share