Feasibility of a Habit-Based Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Cancer Survivors
A Habit-Based Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Cancer Survivors: A Feasibility Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cancer and its treatments are associated with long-term side effects including lowered physical strength and quality of life. Decreasing sedentary behaviour improves health outcomes in cancer survivors. Habit-based programs aimed at lowering sedentary behaviour have been successful in decreasing sedentary behaviour in other populations. However, limited clinical trials aimed at lowering sedentary behaviour have recruited cancer survivors, and none are exclusively based on Habit Theory. The primary goal of this clinical trial is to test the feasibility of an 8-week, habit-based program to lower sedentary behaviour in cancer survivors. Sedentary behaviour refers to low-energy activities performed during waking hours in a seated, reclined or laid down position. Secondarily, this clinical trial aims to examine changes in sedentary behaviour, physical strength, habit, and quality of life. Enrolled participants will be assigned to a sedentary behaviour or active control group. The sedentary behaviour group will receive 8 weekly sheets consisting of tips recommending to lower sedentary behaviour. Tips will be individualized to participants' lifestyles, and will consider their cancer-specific and other physical limitations. Participants in the sedentary behaviour group will also meet with the researcher once a week for a check-in session for more individualized tips and progressions. The active control group will receive the Canadian 24-hour Movement Guidelines, and a handout highlighting the benefits of lowering sedentary behaviour. Both groups will be provided with wearable activity monitors (Fitbits).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable cancer
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
July 10, 2026
July 1, 2026
8 months
July 2, 2026
July 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Enrollment
Participant enrollment rate will be a measure of feasibility. Enrollment will be calculated by measuring the number of participants who enrolled in the intervention, divided by the number of participants who were assessed for eligibility.
Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).
Adherence
Adherence is another measure of feasibility. Two types of adherence will be measured: check-in session adherence and tip adherence. Check-in session adherence will be calculated by assessing the number of check-in sessions attended divided by the total number of check-in sessions that took place (i.e. 8 sessions). Tip adherence will be calculated by the number of days that the daily tip goal of 2-4 tips was met, divided by 56 (7 days per week for 8 weeks).
From baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).
Attrition
Attrition will be a measure of feasibility. Attrition will be measured by calculating the number of participants who did not complete the intervention, divided by the number of participants who were randomized.
Assessed from baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).
Adverse Events
Adverse events will be a measure of feasibility. This will be assessed as an unexpected and severe medical problem or injury (e.g., cardiac-related events, musculoskeletal injury or pain, falls) that occurs due to the intervention.
From baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).
Participant Satisfaction
A participant satisfaction survey will be administered following the 8-week intervention to assess the acceptability of the intervention by using researcher-generated statements (e.g., "I found the sedentary behaviour reduction intervention rewarding"). The survey will assess the burden of the program and the participant's feedback regarding the sedentary behaviour intervention and overall study experience. Likert scales ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) will be used. The active control group will complete a satisfaction survey which will include statements relevant to the active control arm.
Post-intervention (8 weeks).
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Objective Sedentary Behaviour
Change from baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).
Self-Reported Sedentary Behaviour
Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).
Habit
Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).
Physical Function
Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).
Cancer-Specific Quality of Life
Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Sedentary Behaviour Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALThe sedentary behaviour intervention will consist of weekly tick-sheets, one weekly check-in session, and a Fitbit for physical inactivity reminders over 8 weeks. The weekly tick-sheets will consist of tips recommending to lower sedentary behaviour by enacting actions in the presence of cues. Progressions, illustrations and steps to perform these actions will be provided as an attachment with the tick-sheets. An example of a tip is "During TV/online video ad breaks or when you finish watching one episode of a show or online video, climb up and down a staircase to reduce cancer-related fatigue associated with prolonged sitting". Tips will be individualized to participants' lifestyles, and will consider their cancer-specific and other physical limitations. Participants in the sedentary behaviour group will also meet with the researcher once a week for a check-in session for more individualized tips and progressions.
Active Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe active control group will receive the Canadian 24-hour Movement Guidelines, and a handout highlighting the benefits of reducing sedentary behaviour. They will also receive Fitbits, with the hourly inactivity reminders turned off.
Interventions
The sedentary behaviour intervention will consist of weekly tick-sheets, one weekly check-in session, and a Fitbit for physical inactivity reminders over 8 weeks. The weekly tick-sheets will consist of tips recommending to lower sedentary behaviour by enacting actions in the presence of cues. Progressions, illustrations and steps to perform these actions will be provided as an attachment with the tick-sheets. An example of a tip is "During TV/online video ad breaks or when you finish watching one episode of a show or online video, climb up and down a staircase to reduce cancer-related fatigue associated with prolonged sitting". Tips will be individualized to participants' lifestyles, and will consider their cancer-specific and other physical limitations. Participants in the sedentary behaviour group will also meet with the researcher once a week for a check-in session for more individualized tips and progressions.
The active control group will receive the Canadian 24-hour Movement Guidelines, and a handout highlighting the benefits of reducing sedentary behaviour. They will also receive Fitbits, with the hourly inactivity reminders turned off.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- have been diagnosed with localized or asymptomatic metastatic cancer of any type
- completed primary cancer treatment
- self-report being sedentary for more than or equal to 8 hours per day
- access to the internet and a device with a webcam
- able to complete the study in English
You may not qualify if:
- presence of other primary or recurrent invasive cancer
- having experienced a fall in the last 12 months
- not residing in Canada
- participating in other behaviour change interventions
- using a gait aid device
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Toronto - Athletic Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2W6, Canada
Related Publications (11)
Park C, Larsen B, Mogos M, Muchira J, Dietrich M, LaNoue M, Jean J, Norfleet J, Doyle A, Ahn S, Mulvaney S. A multiple technology-based and individually-tailored Sit Less program for people with cardiovascular disease: A randomized controlled trial study protocol. PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0302582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302582. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38722831BACKGROUNDTam RM, Zablocki RW, Liu C, Narayan HK, Natarajan L, LaCroix AZ, Dillon L, Sakoulas E, Hartman SJ. Feasibility of a Health Coach Intervention to Reduce Sitting Time and Improve Physical Functioning Among Breast Cancer Survivors: Pilot Intervention Study. JMIR Cancer. 2023 Dec 19;9:e49934. doi: 10.2196/49934.
PMID: 38113082BACKGROUNDGardner, B., Rebar, A. L., de Wit, S., & Lally, P. (2024). What is habit and how can it be used to change real-world behaviour? Narrowing the theory-reality gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 18(6), e12975. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12975
BACKGROUNDWhite I, Smith L, Aggio D, Shankar S, Begum S, Matei R, Fox KR, Hamer M, Iliffe S, Jefferis BJ, Tyler N, Gardner B. On Your Feet to Earn Your Seat: pilot RCT of a theory-based sedentary behaviour reduction intervention for older adults. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 May 8;3:23. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0139-6. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28491459BACKGROUNDMatei R, Thune-Boyle I, Hamer M, Iliffe S, Fox KR, Jefferis BJ, Gardner B. Acceptability of a theory-based sedentary behaviour reduction intervention for older adults ('On Your Feet to Earn Your Seat'). BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 2;15:606. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1921-0.
PMID: 26135402BACKGROUNDTremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, Chastin SFM, Altenburg TM, Chinapaw MJM; SBRN Terminology Consensus Project Participants. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8.
PMID: 28599680BACKGROUNDSardinha LB, Santos DA, Silva AM, Baptista F, Owen N. Breaking-up sedentary time is associated with physical function in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Jan;70(1):119-24. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu193. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
PMID: 25324221BACKGROUNDGaskin CJ, Craike M, Mohebbi M, Salmon J, Courneya KS, Broadbent S, Livingston PM. Associations of objectively measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behavior with quality of life and psychological well-being in prostate cancer survivors. Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Sep;27(9):1093-103. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0787-5. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
PMID: 27469939BACKGROUNDGotay CC, Muraoka MY. Quality of life in long-term survivors of adult-onset cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 May 6;90(9):656-67. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.9.656.
PMID: 9586662BACKGROUNDGrusdat NP, Stauber A, Tolkmitt M, Schnabel J, Schubotz B, Wright PR, Schulz H. Routine cancer treatments and their impact on physical function, symptoms of cancer-related fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):3733-3744. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06787-5. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
PMID: 35018519BACKGROUNDMuhandiramge J, Orchard SG, Warner ET, van Londen GJ, Zalcberg JR. Functional Decline in the Cancer Patient: A Review. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;14(6):1368. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061368.
PMID: 35326520BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will only be aware that the researchers are comparing the two conditions; they will be blinded to the study hypotheses.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2026
First Posted
July 10, 2026
Study Start
December 30, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share