NCT07449026

Brief Summary

This study examines whether physical therapy faculty can reliably and feasibly use the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric adapted for physical therapy (LCJR-PT) to score students' clinical judgment during a recorded simulation experience. Multiple trained faculty raters will independently score the same student videos, and the level of agreement between raters will be measured. Faculty will also report how long scoring takes and their perceptions of the rubric's usefulness.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
4mo left

Started Mar 2026

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress55%
Mar 2026Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 26, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 4, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 9, 2026

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 4, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

February 26, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 3, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Clinical judgementLasaterPhysical therapy educationFeasibilityReliabilitySimulationAssessmentDoctor of Physical Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for LCJR-PT total and domain scores

    Two-way random effects ICC model to assess interrater reliability of total scores and individual domain scores (noticing, interpreting, responding, reflecting) across 3-5 faculty raters.

    Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Rater Scoring Time

    Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  • Faculty Usability and Feasibility Perception

    Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Doctor of Physical Therapy Student Simulation Group

Doctor of Physical Therapy Students who will undergo a 35 minute simulation session that will be video recorded.

Other: Video Recorded Acute Care Simulation

Faculty Raters

A group of faculty in the Doctor of Physical Therapy program who will assess student simulation recordings using the LCJR-PT tool.

Other: Faculty Rating of Acute Care Simulation Video Using the LCJR-PT

Interventions

Participants complete a routine, curriculum-based standardized acute care simulation (30-35 minutes including reflection).

Doctor of Physical Therapy Student Simulation Group

Faculty members will assess and rate each student acute care simulation video using the LCJR-PT tool.

Faculty Raters

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

First- and second-year Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students and full-time DPT faculty at Youngstown State University

You may qualify if:

  • Enrolled as a 1st or 2nd year DPT student at YSU
  • Provided informed consent
  • Full-time faculty member teaching in the YSU DPT program
  • Provided informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Did not provide informed consent
  • \- Did not provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Youngstown State University

Youngstown, Ohio, 44555, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Halliday DA, Patterson BJ. Rater Training and Assessment of Student Clinical Judgment: An Experimental Inquiry. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2025 Jul-Aug 01;46(4):209-215. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001399. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

    PMID: 40179145BACKGROUND
  • Rogers BA, Franklin AE. Lasater clinical judgment rubric reliability for scoring clinical judgment after observing asynchronous simulation and feasibility/usability with learners. Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jun;125:105769. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105769. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

    PMID: 36931008BACKGROUND
  • Adamson KA, Gubrud P, Sideras S, Lasater K. Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: three approaches. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Feb;51(2):66-73. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20111130-03. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

    PMID: 22132718BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Edmund Ickert, PhD

CONTACT

Rebecca Riblet, DPT

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Primary Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2026

First Posted

March 4, 2026

Study Start

March 9, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 4, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No individual participant data are planned to be shared. Aggregate results will be reported in publications/presentations.

Locations