Interrater Reliability and Feasibility of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric for Use in Physical Therapy Simulation
Reliability and Feasibility of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric Adapted for Physical Therapy (LCJR-PT) to Evaluate Clinical Judgment During Standardized Simulation Experiences in Doctor of Physical Therapy Students
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examines whether physical therapy faculty can reliably and feasibly use the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric adapted for physical therapy (LCJR-PT) to score students' clinical judgment during a recorded simulation experience. Multiple trained faculty raters will independently score the same student videos, and the level of agreement between raters will be measured. Faculty will also report how long scoring takes and their perceptions of the rubric's usefulness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 9, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
March 4, 2026
March 1, 2026
9 months
February 26, 2026
March 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for LCJR-PT total and domain scores
Two-way random effects ICC model to assess interrater reliability of total scores and individual domain scores (noticing, interpreting, responding, reflecting) across 3-5 faculty raters.
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Rater Scoring Time
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Faculty Usability and Feasibility Perception
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Doctor of Physical Therapy Student Simulation Group
Doctor of Physical Therapy Students who will undergo a 35 minute simulation session that will be video recorded.
Faculty Raters
A group of faculty in the Doctor of Physical Therapy program who will assess student simulation recordings using the LCJR-PT tool.
Interventions
Participants complete a routine, curriculum-based standardized acute care simulation (30-35 minutes including reflection).
Faculty members will assess and rate each student acute care simulation video using the LCJR-PT tool.
Eligibility Criteria
First- and second-year Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students and full-time DPT faculty at Youngstown State University
You may qualify if:
- Enrolled as a 1st or 2nd year DPT student at YSU
- Provided informed consent
- Full-time faculty member teaching in the YSU DPT program
- Provided informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Did not provide informed consent
- \- Did not provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Youngstown State University
Youngstown, Ohio, 44555, United States
Related Publications (3)
Halliday DA, Patterson BJ. Rater Training and Assessment of Student Clinical Judgment: An Experimental Inquiry. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2025 Jul-Aug 01;46(4):209-215. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001399. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
PMID: 40179145BACKGROUNDRogers BA, Franklin AE. Lasater clinical judgment rubric reliability for scoring clinical judgment after observing asynchronous simulation and feasibility/usability with learners. Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jun;125:105769. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105769. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
PMID: 36931008BACKGROUNDAdamson KA, Gubrud P, Sideras S, Lasater K. Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: three approaches. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Feb;51(2):66-73. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20111130-03. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
PMID: 22132718BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2026
First Posted
March 4, 2026
Study Start
March 9, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No individual participant data are planned to be shared. Aggregate results will be reported in publications/presentations.