High-Fidelity Simulation and Longitudinal Outcomes in Novice Nurses (HFS-NOVA)
HFS-NOVA
Divergent Trajectories of Clinical Performance and Psychological Outcomes in Novice Nurses Following High-Fidelity Simulation: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examined whether high-fidelity simulation (HFS) training - a realistic, hands-on learning method using advanced patient mannequins - can improve both technical skills and psychological well-being in newly graduated nurses. Seventy novice nurses at a tertiary medical centre in Taiwan participated in a structured HFS session focused on airway crisis management. Six outcomes were measured at three time points: before training (T1), immediately after training (T2), and three months later (T3). These outcomes included: airway management knowledge, clinical performance, learning attitude, self-efficacy (confidence in clinical abilities), nursing learning resilience (ability to cope with professional challenges), and psychological well-being.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 28, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2026
CompletedMay 22, 2026
May 1, 2026
9 months
April 29, 2026
May 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Performance
Assessed using the 40-item Clinical Performance Checklist (CPC) scored by two independent raters (Cohen's κ = 0.88). Higher scores indicate better procedural performance. Range: 0-40.
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2, approximately 1 day after T1), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Self-Efficacy
Assessed using a 10-item General Self-Efficacy Scale measuring confidence in managing clinical airway challenges (Cronbach's α = 0.922). Range: 10-40.
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Airway Management Knowledge
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Learning Attitude
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Nursing Learning Resilience
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Psychological Well-Being
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Study Arms (1)
HFS Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALAll enrolled novice nurses received a standardised 40-minute high-fidelity simulation session focused on airway crisis management, comprising pre-briefing, scenario, and structured debriefing phases.
Interventions
A standardised 40-minute HFS session using SimMan 3G (Laerdal Medical) comprising three phases: (1) Pre-briefing (10 min): environmental orientation, fiction contract, and psychological safety emphasis. (2) Scenario phase (20 min): each participant acted as primary decision-maker for a patient with acute respiratory failure, performing assessment, oxygen titration, airway suctioning, and care escalation. (3) Structured debriefing (10 min): facilitator-led debrief using the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning (DML) framework.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Newly registered nursing license with 0 to 12 months of clinical experience
- Enrolled in the mandatory 2-year New Graduate Nurse (NGN) residency programme at Tri-Service General Hospital
- Willing and able to complete all three data collection phases (T1, T2, and T3)
- Able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Prior extensive critical care clinical experience
- Participation in a similar airway management simulation programme within the preceding 6 months
- Inability to participate in the full simulation session due to scheduling or health reasons
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tri-Service General Hospital
Taipei, 114, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wu-Chien Chien, Ph.D.
Tri-Service General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2026
First Posted
May 22, 2026
Study Start
March 28, 2025
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
May 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share