NCT07448012

Brief Summary

This study evaluates whether a brief, structured team reflection programme embedded within routine elite underwater rugby training is associated with longitudinal change in key psychosocial team over 6 weeks and assessed at baseline (T0), mid-intervention (week 3; T1) and post-intervention (week 6; T2). Outcomes include team cohesion, psychological safety, peer trust and team identification measured via validated questionnaires.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
1mo left

Started Mar 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress90%
Mar 2026May 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 26, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 4, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 15, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 15, 2026

Last Updated

March 5, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

February 26, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 3, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Underwater rugbyTeam reflectionTeam cohesionPsychological safetySports psychology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Team Cohesion (GEQ-12 short form)

    Team cohesion measured using the Spanish 12-item short form of the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ). Items are rated on a 1-9 scale; negatively keyed items are reverse-scored. A composite cohesion score is computed as the mean of items, with higher scores indicating greater perceived cohesion.

    Baseline (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes), Week 3 (T1; up to 5 minutes), and Week 6 (T2, post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Psychological Safety (Edmondson 7-item Team Psychological Safety scale)

    Baseline (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes), Week 3 (T1; up to 5 minutes), and Week 6 (T2, post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)

  • Peer Trust (HERO horizontal trust, 4-item team-referent measure)

    Baseline (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes), Week 3 (T1; up to 5 minutes), and Week 6 (T2, post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)

  • Team Identification (6-item team-referent identification scale)

    Baseline (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes), Week 3 (T1; up to 5 minutes), and Week 6 (T2, post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)

Study Arms (1)

Experimental: Usual elite underwater rugby training + Brief Structured Team Reflection (BSTR)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants continue their routine elite underwater rugby training as planned by the team staff and additionally complete an embedded Brief Structured Team Reflection (BSTR) programme over 6 weeks (16 post-training sessions; approximately 3/week; 5-15 minutes each). BSTR sessions occur immediately after training, before athletes disperse.

Behavioral: Usual elite underwater rugby training

Interventions

Ongoing routine team training delivered during the 6-week study period according to the team's normal training plan (e.g., in-water technical/tactical practice and dry-land conditioning as typically scheduled). Training content is not modified for research purposes. Training attendance and any major deviations (e.g., cancellations, unusual loads) are recorded as part of routine monitoring.

Experimental: Usual elite underwater rugby training + Brief Structured Team Reflection (BSTR)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male elite underwater rugby athletes aged 18 years or older.
  • Officially rostered in the squad and training regularly (minimum 2 sessions per week).
  • Able to complete Spanish-language questionnaires.
  • Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.
  • Available to complete assessments at baseline (T0), week 3 (T1), and week 6 (T2).

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to complete the questionnaires reliably (e.g., language/comprehension barriers).
  • Anticipated prolonged absence during the 6-week period that would prevent meaningful exposure to the intervention and/or completion of follow-up assessments.
  • Declines participation or does not provide informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Tecnológico de Antioquia

Guarne, Antioquia, 054080, Colombia

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

SAMUEL JOSE GAVIRIA ALZATE, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2026

First Posted

March 4, 2026

Study Start

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2026

Last Updated

March 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly. The sample is small and drawn from a single, identifiable elite underwater rugby squad, so even de-identified records could carry a meaningful risk of re-identification when combined with contextual information (e.g., roster composition, training attendance patterns, and time-point assessments). Participant consent covers analysis and publication of aggregated results rather than unrestricted public release of participant-level data. Summary statistics and full methodological details will be reported in publications. De-identified extracts or additional details may be considered on a case-by-case basis, subject to a data-use agreement, ethics approval, and safeguards that minimise re-identification risk.

Locations