NCT07448012

Brief Summary

This single-arm field evaluation examined whether a brief, structured team reflection routine embedded within usual elite underwater rugby training was associated with change in team cohesion, psychological safety, peer trust, and team identification across three measurement occasions. Twenty-five male athletes contributed at least one assessment. Baseline responses were recorded on 16-17 February 2026 (T0), midpoint responses after session 6 on 5-9 March 2026 (T1), and endpoint responses after session 12 on 18 March 2026 (T2). The registered plan anticipated 16 sessions over six weeks; operational delivery concluded after 12 sessions, and no later follow-up was conducted.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 16, 2026

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 26, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 4, 2026

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 18, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 18, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

September 8, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

February 26, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 2, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Underwater rugbyTeam reflectionTeam cohesionPsychological safetySports psychology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Team Cohesion (GEQ-12 short form)

    Team cohesion measured using the Spanish 12-item short form of the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ). Items are rated on a 1-9 scale; negatively keyed items are reverse-scored. A composite cohesion score is computed as the mean of items, with higher scores indicating greater perceived cohesion.

    Baseline 16-17 February 2026 (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes); T1: 5-9 March 2026 (after session 6; T1; up to 5 minutes) and T2: 18 March 2026 (after session 12; post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Psychological Safety (Edmondson 7-item Team Psychological Safety scale)

    Baseline 16-17 February 2026 (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes); T1: 5-9 March 2026 (after session 6; T1; up to 5 minutes) and T2: 18 March 2026 (after session 12; post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)

  • Peer Trust (HERO horizontal trust, 4-item team-referent measure)

    Baseline 16-17 February 2026 (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes); T1: 5-9 March 2026 (after session 6; T1; up to 5 minutes) and T2: 18 March 2026 (after session 12; post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)

  • Team Identification (6-item team-referent identification scale)

    Baseline 16-17 February 2026 (T0, pre-intervention; up to 5 minutes); T1: 5-9 March 2026 (after session 6; T1; up to 5 minutes) and T2: 18 March 2026 (after session 12; post-intervention; up to 5 minutes)

Study Arms (1)

Usual elite underwater rugby training plus BSTR

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants continued usual elite underwater rugby training and took part in 12 embedded Brief Structured Team Reflection sessions. There was no separate control arm.

Behavioral: Brief Structured Team Reflection (BSTR)

Interventions

Twelve brief, structured team-reflection sessions were embedded within usual elite underwater rugby training. Athletes responded to concise prompts in turn under a 'share-only' rule that prohibited interruption, rebuttal, blame, selection discussion, and cross-talk. Sessions normally closed with an observable cue, rule, norm, or micro-habit for the next training experience. The registered plan anticipated 16 sessions; operational delivery concluded after session 12.

Usual elite underwater rugby training plus BSTR

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male elite underwater rugby athletes aged 18 years or older.
  • Officially rostered in the squad and training regularly (minimum 2 sessions per week).
  • Able to complete Spanish-language questionnaires.
  • Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.
  • Available to complete assessments at baseline (T0), week 3 (T1), and week 6 (T2).

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to complete the questionnaires reliably (e.g., language/comprehension barriers).
  • Anticipated prolonged absence during the 6-week period that would prevent meaningful exposure to the intervention and/or completion of follow-up assessments.
  • Declines participation or does not provide informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Tecnológico de Antioquia

Guarne, Antioquia, 054080, Colombia

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Sponsor investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2026

First Posted

March 4, 2026

Study Start

February 16, 2026

Primary Completion

March 18, 2026

Study Completion

March 18, 2026

Last Updated

September 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly. The sample is small and drawn from a single, identifiable elite underwater rugby squad, so even de-identified records could carry a meaningful risk of re-identification when combined with contextual information (e.g., roster composition, training attendance patterns, and time-point assessments). Participant consent covers analysis and publication of aggregated results rather than unrestricted public release of participant-level data. Summary statistics and full methodological details will be reported in publications. De-identified extracts or additional details may be considered on a case-by-case basis, subject to a data-use agreement, ethics approval, and safeguards that minimise re-identification risk.

Locations