NCT07429747

Brief Summary

Most published research on 3D-printed restorative materials is laboratory-based, focusing primarily on mechanical performance and material properties under controlled conditions. While such studies provide important foundational data, they do not fully replicate the complexity of the oral environment. Only a limited number of clinical investigations have directly compared 3D-printed restorations with conventional direct composite restorations in Class II cavities Furthermore, the integration of a digital workflow introduces additional costs and time requirements related to equipment, software, and training. These factors must be justified by demonstrable improvements in clinical outcomes or cost-effectiveness. By evaluating both clinical performance and economic impact, this trial aims to generate practical, real-world evidence that can guide clinicians in selecting appropriate restorative materials and techniques for routine dental practice.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
16mo left

Started Feb 2026

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress20%
Feb 2026Oct 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 13, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 20, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 24, 2026

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2027

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 4, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

February 13, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of participants with a change in functional properties of the restoration using (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations

    Fracture of material, retention of the restoration, marginal adaptation, occlusal wear, proximal contact utilizing visual examination and radiographic assessment. For each criterion, one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory \& poor).

    after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.

  • Number of participants with a change in Biological properties of the restoration using (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations

    (Postoperative hypersensitivity \& tooth vitality, Recurrence of caries, erosion \& abfraction,Tooth integrity (enamel cracks or tooth fractures),Periodontal response (compared to a reference tooth), Adjacent mucosa, Oral \& general health) utilizing visual examination. For each criterion, one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory \& poor).

    after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.

  • Number of participants with a change in Esthetic properties of the restoration using (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations

    (Surface luster, Staining (surface \&margin),Color match \& translucency \& Esthetic anatomical form) utilizing visual examination For each criterion, one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory \& poor).

    after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.

Study Arms (2)

Bulk-filled resin composite

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For restoration of Class II cavity preparations, a sectional metal matrix system (TOR VM, Russia) will be used to properly reestablish proximal anatomy and contact. The system includes a round separation ring and a pre-contoured metal band designed to reproduce natural proximal contours. A properly sized wedge is inserted to ensure optimal gingival adaptation of the matrix band and to prevent overhangs. The cavity is thoroughly rinsed with water before proceeding with adhesive procedures. Selective enamel etching is performed using 37% phosphoric acid gel applied to enamel margins for 15 seconds, followed by thorough rinsing and gentle air-drying. A universal adhesive system, Tetric N-Bond Universal (Ivoclar Vivadent AG), is then applied in two consecutive layers. Each layer is actively rubbed for 10 seconds, gently air-dried for 5 seconds, and light-cured for 20 seconds to ensure adequate polymerization and bond strength. Restoration is completed using Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin

Other: bulk fill composite

3D-printed Ceramic reinforced resin restoration

EXPERIMENTAL

Tooth preparation for indirect inlay restorations follows conservative restorative principles, with the primary objective of eliminating carious tissue and unsupported enamel while preserving as much healthy tooth structure as possible. The preparation design emphasizes mechanical stability, stress distribution, and optimal seating of the final restoration. Cavity walls are shaped with a slight occlusal divergence of approximately 6-10°, facilitating proper insertion and seating of the inlay without compromising retention. The pulpal floor is prepared flat to enhance resistance form, and all internal line angles are rounded to minimize stress concentration within both the tooth and the restorative material. Cavosurface margins are ideally prepared as supragingival butt-joint margins whenever clinically feasible, promoting periodontal health, improved isolation, and easier finishing procedures.

Other: 3D-printed Ceramic reinforced resin restoration

Interventions

Tooth preparation for indirect inlay restorations follows conservative restorative principles, with the primary objective of eliminating carious tissue and unsupported enamel while preserving as much healthy tooth structure as possible. The preparation design emphasizes mechanical stability, stress distribution, and optimal seating of the final restoration. Cavity walls are shaped with a slight occlusal divergence of approximately 6-10°, facilitating proper insertion and seating of the inlay without compromising retention. The pulpal floor is prepared flat to enhance resistance form, and all internal line angles are rounded to minimize stress concentration within both the tooth and the restorative material. Cavosurface margins are ideally prepared as supragingival butt-joint margins whenever clinically feasible, promoting periodontal health, improved isolation, and easier finishing procedures. Cuspal coverage is generally avoided in inlay preparations to maintain maximum tooth integrit

3D-printed Ceramic reinforced resin restoration

For restoration of Class II cavity preparations, a sectional metal matrix system (TOR VM, Russia) will be used to properly reestablish proximal anatomy and contact. The system includes a round separation ring and a pre-contoured metal band designed to reproduce natural proximal contours. A properly sized wedge is inserted to ensure optimal gingival adaptation of the matrix band and to prevent overhangs. The cavity is thoroughly rinsed with water before proceeding with adhesive procedures. Selective enamel etching is performed using 37% phosphoric acid gel applied to enamel margins for 15 seconds, followed by thorough rinsing and gentle air-drying. A universal adhesive system, Tetric N-Bond Universal (Ivoclar Vivadent AG), is then applied in two consecutive layers. Each layer is actively rubbed for 10 seconds, gently air-dried for 5 seconds, and light-cured for 20 seconds to ensure adequate polymerization and bond strength. Restoration is completed using Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin c

Bulk-filled resin composite

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient-related:
  • Adults aged 22 to 45 years.
  • Low to moderate caries risk.
  • Normal occlusion.
  • No signs or symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders.
  • Satisfactory oral hygiene.
  • Medically fit to receive routine restorative dental treatment.
  • Lesion-related:
  • Permanent molar requiring a compound Class II restoration.
  • Primary carious lesion classified as ICDAS score 5.
  • Presence of an adjacent tooth and a sound opposing tooth in occlusion.
  • No clinical signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis in the involved, adjacent, or opposing teeth.
  • No radiographic evidence of periapical pathology.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient-related:
  • Bruxism.
  • Poor cooperation.
  • Inability or unwillingness to attend follow-up visits.
  • Anticipated travel during the study period.
  • Poor oral hygiene.
  • Chronic or advanced periodontitis.
  • Known allergy to any study materials.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Lesion-related:
  • Teeth with visible fractures or cracks.
  • Rampant caries.
  • Defective restorations on adjacent or opposing teeth.
  • Atypical extrinsic staining that may interfere with evaluation.
  • Radiographic signs of apical pathology.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Abdelaziz MM, Fathy S, Alaraby AA, Shehab WI, Temirek MM. Clinical, radiographic and biochemical assessment of proximal cavities restored with composite resin using incremental vs. bulk packing techniques: One-year randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04746-0.

  • Duarte S Jr, Phark JH. Advances in Dental Restorations: A Comprehensive Review of Machinable and 3D-Printed Ceramic-Reinforced Composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jan;37(1):257-276. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13371. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

  • Balestra D, Lowther M, Goracci C, Mandurino M, Cortili S, Paolone G, Louca C, Vichi A. 3D Printed Materials for Permanent Restorations in Indirect Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry: A Critical Review of the Literature. Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 18;17(6):1380. doi: 10.3390/ma17061380.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
assistant lecture

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2026

First Posted

February 24, 2026

Study Start

February 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 4, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03