Performance of Reinforced 3D-Printed Versus Direct Bulk-Filled Resin Composites for Restoring Extensive Class II Cavities in Vital Molars
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Most published research on 3D-printed restorative materials is laboratory-based, focusing primarily on mechanical performance and material properties under controlled conditions. While such studies provide important foundational data, they do not fully replicate the complexity of the oral environment. Only a limited number of clinical investigations have directly compared 3D-printed restorations with conventional direct composite restorations in Class II cavities Furthermore, the integration of a digital workflow introduces additional costs and time requirements related to equipment, software, and training. These factors must be justified by demonstrable improvements in clinical outcomes or cost-effectiveness. By evaluating both clinical performance and economic impact, this trial aims to generate practical, real-world evidence that can guide clinicians in selecting appropriate restorative materials and techniques for routine dental practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2027
March 4, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.5 years
February 13, 2026
March 2, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of participants with a change in functional properties of the restoration using (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations
Fracture of material, retention of the restoration, marginal adaptation, occlusal wear, proximal contact utilizing visual examination and radiographic assessment. For each criterion, one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory \& poor).
after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.
Number of participants with a change in Biological properties of the restoration using (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations
(Postoperative hypersensitivity \& tooth vitality, Recurrence of caries, erosion \& abfraction,Tooth integrity (enamel cracks or tooth fractures),Periodontal response (compared to a reference tooth), Adjacent mucosa, Oral \& general health) utilizing visual examination. For each criterion, one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory \& poor).
after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.
Number of participants with a change in Esthetic properties of the restoration using (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations
(Surface luster, Staining (surface \&margin),Color match \& translucency \& Esthetic anatomical form) utilizing visual examination For each criterion, one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory \& poor).
after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.
Study Arms (2)
Bulk-filled resin composite
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor restoration of Class II cavity preparations, a sectional metal matrix system (TOR VM, Russia) will be used to properly reestablish proximal anatomy and contact. The system includes a round separation ring and a pre-contoured metal band designed to reproduce natural proximal contours. A properly sized wedge is inserted to ensure optimal gingival adaptation of the matrix band and to prevent overhangs. The cavity is thoroughly rinsed with water before proceeding with adhesive procedures. Selective enamel etching is performed using 37% phosphoric acid gel applied to enamel margins for 15 seconds, followed by thorough rinsing and gentle air-drying. A universal adhesive system, Tetric N-Bond Universal (Ivoclar Vivadent AG), is then applied in two consecutive layers. Each layer is actively rubbed for 10 seconds, gently air-dried for 5 seconds, and light-cured for 20 seconds to ensure adequate polymerization and bond strength. Restoration is completed using Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin
3D-printed Ceramic reinforced resin restoration
EXPERIMENTALTooth preparation for indirect inlay restorations follows conservative restorative principles, with the primary objective of eliminating carious tissue and unsupported enamel while preserving as much healthy tooth structure as possible. The preparation design emphasizes mechanical stability, stress distribution, and optimal seating of the final restoration. Cavity walls are shaped with a slight occlusal divergence of approximately 6-10°, facilitating proper insertion and seating of the inlay without compromising retention. The pulpal floor is prepared flat to enhance resistance form, and all internal line angles are rounded to minimize stress concentration within both the tooth and the restorative material. Cavosurface margins are ideally prepared as supragingival butt-joint margins whenever clinically feasible, promoting periodontal health, improved isolation, and easier finishing procedures.
Interventions
Tooth preparation for indirect inlay restorations follows conservative restorative principles, with the primary objective of eliminating carious tissue and unsupported enamel while preserving as much healthy tooth structure as possible. The preparation design emphasizes mechanical stability, stress distribution, and optimal seating of the final restoration. Cavity walls are shaped with a slight occlusal divergence of approximately 6-10°, facilitating proper insertion and seating of the inlay without compromising retention. The pulpal floor is prepared flat to enhance resistance form, and all internal line angles are rounded to minimize stress concentration within both the tooth and the restorative material. Cavosurface margins are ideally prepared as supragingival butt-joint margins whenever clinically feasible, promoting periodontal health, improved isolation, and easier finishing procedures. Cuspal coverage is generally avoided in inlay preparations to maintain maximum tooth integrit
For restoration of Class II cavity preparations, a sectional metal matrix system (TOR VM, Russia) will be used to properly reestablish proximal anatomy and contact. The system includes a round separation ring and a pre-contoured metal band designed to reproduce natural proximal contours. A properly sized wedge is inserted to ensure optimal gingival adaptation of the matrix band and to prevent overhangs. The cavity is thoroughly rinsed with water before proceeding with adhesive procedures. Selective enamel etching is performed using 37% phosphoric acid gel applied to enamel margins for 15 seconds, followed by thorough rinsing and gentle air-drying. A universal adhesive system, Tetric N-Bond Universal (Ivoclar Vivadent AG), is then applied in two consecutive layers. Each layer is actively rubbed for 10 seconds, gently air-dried for 5 seconds, and light-cured for 20 seconds to ensure adequate polymerization and bond strength. Restoration is completed using Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin c
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient-related:
- Adults aged 22 to 45 years.
- Low to moderate caries risk.
- Normal occlusion.
- No signs or symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders.
- Satisfactory oral hygiene.
- Medically fit to receive routine restorative dental treatment.
- Lesion-related:
- Permanent molar requiring a compound Class II restoration.
- Primary carious lesion classified as ICDAS score 5.
- Presence of an adjacent tooth and a sound opposing tooth in occlusion.
- No clinical signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis in the involved, adjacent, or opposing teeth.
- No radiographic evidence of periapical pathology.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient-related:
- Bruxism.
- Poor cooperation.
- Inability or unwillingness to attend follow-up visits.
- Anticipated travel during the study period.
- Poor oral hygiene.
- Chronic or advanced periodontitis.
- Known allergy to any study materials.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Lesion-related:
- Teeth with visible fractures or cracks.
- Rampant caries.
- Defective restorations on adjacent or opposing teeth.
- Atypical extrinsic staining that may interfere with evaluation.
- Radiographic signs of apical pathology.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Abdelaziz MM, Fathy S, Alaraby AA, Shehab WI, Temirek MM. Clinical, radiographic and biochemical assessment of proximal cavities restored with composite resin using incremental vs. bulk packing techniques: One-year randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04746-0.
PMID: 39350180RESULTDuarte S Jr, Phark JH. Advances in Dental Restorations: A Comprehensive Review of Machinable and 3D-Printed Ceramic-Reinforced Composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jan;37(1):257-276. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13371. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
PMID: 39558703RESULTBalestra D, Lowther M, Goracci C, Mandurino M, Cortili S, Paolone G, Louca C, Vichi A. 3D Printed Materials for Permanent Restorations in Indirect Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry: A Critical Review of the Literature. Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 18;17(6):1380. doi: 10.3390/ma17061380.
PMID: 38541534RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant lecture
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2026
First Posted
February 24, 2026
Study Start
February 20, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03