NCT06859086

Brief Summary

the aim of this study is To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Self- Cure Bulk fill Composite Resin Versus Conventional Bulk fill resin composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions over a Period of 24 months Follow-up.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
12mo left

Started Apr 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress53%
Apr 2025May 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 23, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 5, 2025

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2025

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2027

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 5, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

February 23, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Marginal adaptation

    The restoration will be clinically assessed using USPHS criteria. Restoration will be given Alpha for the ideal clinical situation, Bravo for acceptable and charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need of replacement.

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Marginal discoloration

    24 months

  • Recurrent caries

    24 months

  • Retention analysis

    24 months

  • Surface roughness

    24 months

  • Postoperative sensitivity

    24 months

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Self- Cure Bulk fill Resin Composite (Stela Automix or Stela Capsule, SDI Ltd, Australia)

EXPERIMENTAL

New (Stela, SDI Ltd, Australia) restorative Self-cure: using the stela primer then stela composite with no curing.

Procedure: class II restoration

Bulk-fill Resin Composite. (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill, Liechtenstein)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After selective etching of enamel and bonding, the bulk-fill composite resins are inserted then curing.

Procedure: class II restoration

Interventions

A class II cavity will be prepared after local anesthesia has been given as requierd . Rubber dam isolation will be done. Sectional matricing and wedging will be done. Followed by placement of restorative material according to the randomization sequence.

Bulk-fill Resin Composite. (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill, Liechtenstein)Self- Cure Bulk fill Resin Composite (Stela Automix or Stela Capsule, SDI Ltd, Australia)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients consulting in one of the outpatient clinics listed above.
  • Able to tolerate necessary restorative procedures.
  • Provide informed consent.
  • Accepts the 18 months follow-up period.

You may not qualify if:

  • Medically compromised patients, as they will not be able to attend multiple appointments or may require special management.
  • Pregnant women; as radiographs cannot be taken for them.
  • Allergy to any of the restorative materials, including anesthetics.
  • Uncooperative patients, will not abide by the instructions or attend the appointments.
  • Tooth related criteria:
  • Teeth with primary proximal carious lesions.
  • Teeth are vital according to pulp-sensitivity tests.
  • Well-formed and fully-erupted in normal functional occlusion with natural antagonist and adjacent teeth.
  • Deciduous teeth; as the study is targeting only permanent teeth.
  • Teeth with previous restorations, which may add another variable to the study (type of old restorative material, extent of recurrent caries).
  • Spontaneous pain or prolonged pain after sensitivity tests (cold and electrical tests), which would indicate irreversible pulpal damage.
  • Negative sensitivity tests, periapical radiolucencies and sensitivity to axial or lateral percussion, which would indicate pulp necrosis.
  • Teeth presenting external or internal resorption, with adverse pulpal reactions which may affect the outcome of the study.
  • Teeth with cervical caries; which can't be evaluated on periapical radiographs.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cairo University

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Central Study Contacts

Wafaa Marei Kakat, Master Degree

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2025

First Posted

March 5, 2025

Study Start

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations