The Effect of Different Irrigation Methods Used During Endodontic Treatment on Postoperative Pain in Teeth With Periapical Lesions
2 other identifiers
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of different irrigation activation methods used during endodontic treatment on postoperative pain in teeth with periapical lesions, allowing us to clinically determine which agitation technique causes less postoperative pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2026
CompletedFebruary 13, 2026
February 1, 2026
5 months
February 6, 2026
February 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of postoperative pain with VAS after root canal treatment
6, 24, 48, 72 hours, and on the 7th day
Study Arms (4)
Irrigation using conventional needle technique
EXPERIMENTALIrrigation of the root canals was performed using only the conventional needle technique
Irrigation using the Eddy system
EXPERIMENTAL"Irrigation activation of the root canals was performed using the EDDY system
Irrigation using ultrasonic activation
EXPERIMENTALRoot canal irrigation activation was performed using ultrasonic activation."
Irrigation using XP Finisher system
EXPERIMENTALRoot canal irrigation activation was performed using the XP Finisher system.
Interventions
Irrigation procedures were performed with needles of different ırrigation devices
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy patients aged 18-65 years, Patients with chronic apical periodontitis, Patients with a PAI score of 3-5, Mandibular canine and premolar teeth, Teeth without root resorption, periodontal disease, previous endodontic treatment, or calcification.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with systemic diseases, Pregnant patients, Teeth with acute pain, Teeth with crown or root fractures, Patients who have used analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs within the last 12 hours, Patients who have used antibiotics within the last 2 weeks, Immature teeth with open apices, Patients with missing consent or follow-up forms.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Endodontics
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2026
First Posted
February 13, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02