Effect of Anticipated Pain on Corticospinal Excitability
PACE
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate how the anticipation of pain, in the absence of real pain, affects the excitability of the corticospinal pathway. Corticospinal excitability reflects how responsive the motor areas of the brain are when sending signals to muscles. In this study, healthy adult participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive the application of an inert cream on the forearm. Participants in the experimental group will be told that the cream may cause pain, while participants in the control group will be informed that the cream is completely inactive. In reality, the cream has no physical effect in either group. This design allows the researchers to isolate the effect of pain anticipation (a nocebo effect) without exposing participants to actual pain. Corticospinal excitability will be measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a non-invasive technique that stimulates the motor cortex to assess brain-to-muscle communication. Measurements will be taken before and after the application of the cream. In addition, psychological factors related to catastrophizing and fear of movement will be assessed using validated questionnaires, and physiological responses associated with stress will be measured through heart rate variability. The main question this study aims to answer is whether anticipating pain, even without experiencing real pain, alters corticospinal excitability, and whether this effect is influenced by fear of movement and catastrophizing. By improving our understanding of how pain-related expectations affect brain function, this research may contribute to better strategies for preventing maladaptive motor changes associated with chronic pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 12, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
CompletedFebruary 13, 2026
February 1, 2026
5 months
December 17, 2025
February 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in corticospinal excitability
Corticospinal excitability will be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the primary motor cortex. Single magnetic pulses of increasing intensity will be delivered to construct input-output (I/O) recruitment curves for each participant at baseline, immediately after cream application, and 10 minutes after cream application. Stimulation intensity will be increased in 3-5% steps, and 10 stimuli will be delivered at each intensity level. Motor evoked potentials elicited by TMS will be recorded using surface electromyography from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the hand. I/O curves will be modeled using a Boltzmann sigmoidal function, and the slope, plateau, and S50 parameters will be extracted. Changes in corticospinal excitability will be compared between groups across these time points.
During single session: baseline (pre-cream application), immediately post-cream application, and 10 minutes post-cream application
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Fear-avoidance beliefs related to pain
Baseline
Kinesiophobia
Baseline
Change in heart rate variability from Baseline
During the single study session, from the baseline resting period through completion of the TMS procedure (up to 60 minutes)
Pain catastrophizing related to pain
Baseline
Change from baseline in intracortical inhibition and facilitation (SICI and SICF)
During single session: baseline (pre-cream application), immediately post-cream application, and 10 minutes post-cream application
Other Outcomes (3)
Brief Pain Inventory
Baseline
Change from baseline in perceived apprehension
During the single study session: baseline (pre-cream application), immediately post-cream application, and 10 minutes post-cream application
Change from baseline in perceived pain intensity
During the single study session: baseline (pre-cream application), immediately post-cream application, and 10 minutes post-cream application
Study Arms (2)
Control Group - Inert Cream (Neutral Information)
OTHERParticipants in this control arm receive the application of an inert cream on the forearm. They are informed that the cream is inactive and will not produce any sensation or effect. This arm serves as a control condition for the manipulation of pain anticipation, with identical procedures and measurements as the experimental arm, except for the information provided about the expected effects of the cream.
Experimental Group - Inert Cream (Pain Expectation Information)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this experimental arm receive the application of an inert cream on the forearm. They are informed that the cream is expected to induce painful sensations after a delay, with pain gradually increasing in intensity over time. This information is used to induce anticipation of pain without actual nociceptive stimulation. All procedures and measurements are identical to those of the control arm, except for the information provided about the expected effects of the cream.
Interventions
The intervention consists of an information-based manipulation designed to induce (or not induce) anticipation of pain. Participants receive the application of an inert cream on the forearm. Depending on group assignment, participants are informed either that the cream is inactive and will not produce any sensation, or that it is expected to produce painful sensations such as burning, stinging, or tingling, with onset approximately 10 minutes after application and a gradual increase in intensity over time, reaching a moderate to strong level of perceived pain. The cream itself has no active or sensory effects in any group. This intervention allows manipulation of pain expectation without inducing actual nociceptive stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 to 65 years.
- Ability to understand spoken and written French sufficient to follow study procedures.
- Written informed consent obtained prior to participation.
- Subjects affiliated with or receiving social security benefits
You may not qualify if:
- History of psychiatric disorders (including intellectual disability or severe cognitive, behavioral, or affective impairment) that could interfere with understanding the study or providing informed consent.
- History of neurological disorders, including epilepsy, stroke, brain or spinal cord surgery, or any neurological disease affecting motor or sensory function.
- Inability to provide informed consent (e.g., dementia, significant hearing impairment, insufficient language proficiency).
- Any pain condition within the past 3 months, regardless of origin.
- Recent musculoskeletal injury or surgery within the past 3 months.
- Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including a history of epilepsy or the presence of intracranial metallic objects, cochlear implants, or other non-removable metallic implants in or near the head.
- Use of analgesic or psychotropic medications.
- Individuals under legal guardianship or curatorship.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Presence of a cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electronic medical device.
- Known allergy or history of skin reaction to any component of the inert cream used in the study (Medicafarm® Neutre Premium Longue Glisse).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Eurasport
Loos, Nord, 59120, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- A randomized number is allocated for all participants.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2025
First Posted
February 12, 2026
Study Start
February 12, 2026
Primary Completion
July 1, 2026
Study Completion
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share