NCT06929559

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the anticipation of pain influences gait control and psychophysiological responses in healthy individuals. Participants will receive a neutral cream described either as potentially painful (experimental group) or inert (control group), and their behavioral and physiological adaptations will be measured during walking tasks.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
31mo left

Started Oct 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress19%
Oct 2025Oct 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 27, 2025

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 16, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2025

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2025

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 30, 2028

Expected
Last Updated

September 26, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

29 days

First QC Date

March 27, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 22, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Nocebo effectPain anticipationPain expectationMotricityGaitWalkingHealthyMuscle synergies

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Walk ratio

    Index that quantifies gait adaptations. Measured via GAITRite mat and Zebris treadmill.

    During intervention (pre/post cream application): for the mat, during a 2-minute free walk and for the treadmill, during a 5-minute treadmill walk with increases in speed every 30 seconds.

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Gait Kinematics: Joint amplitudes

    During intervention (pre/post cream application): for the mat, during a 2-minute free walk and for the treadmill, during a 5-minute treadmill walk with increases in speed every 30 seconds.

  • ECG/Heart Rate Variability (HRV)

    During intervention (pre/post cream application): for the mat, during a 2-minute free walk and for the treadmill, during a 5-minute treadmill walk with increases in speed every 30 seconds.

  • Electrodermal Activity (EDA)

    During intervention (pre/post cream application): for the mat, during a 2-minute free walk and for the treadmill, during a 5-minute treadmill walk with increases in speed every 30 seconds.

  • Pain Catastrophizing (PCS)

    Before intervention.

  • Fear-Avoidance Beliefs (FACS)

    Before intervention.

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Nocebo Conditioning Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm will receive the neutral cream with instructions suggesting it may cause pain.

Other: Pain expectation conditioningOther: Intervention: Gait

Control Group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants receive application of identical neutral cream with verbal and behavioral suggestions that it may cause localized pain, creating a nocebo effect through expectation manipulation.

Other: Comparator (Control Group)Other: Intervention: Gait

Interventions

Participants receive application of a neutral cream (MEDICAFARM) with verbal and behavioral suggestions that it may cause localized pain. Researchers wear gloves during application and emphasize potential discomfort, stating effects may intensify with movement.

Nocebo Conditioning Group

Participants receive identical application of the neutral cream but are informed it is inert and harmless. Researchers apply the cream without gloves and provide neutral instructions.

Control Group

Participants undergo assessment procedures including: * Pre- and post-application gait analysis (GAITRite mat, Zebris treadmill) * Physiological monitoring (EMG, HRV, EDA) * Identical questionnaires (BPI, TSK, FACS, PCS, VAS)

Control GroupNocebo Conditioning Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18-35 years
  • Healthy participant with no self-reported diagnosed neurological, musculoskeletal, or cardiovascular disorders
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) \< 30
  • Ability to walk unaided for at least 10 minutes without major physical limitations

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of pain at the time of testing
  • Self-reported diagnosed condition affecting mobility
  • Known allergy to any component of the study cream
  • Allergy to EMG electrode adhesives
  • Inability to stand unassisted for more than 1 minute
  • Inability to walk/run at the required speed and distance
  • Weight exceeding 150 kg (due to treadmill limitations)
  • Recent intake of:
  • Analgesics (within 6 hours)
  • Cigarettes (within 6 hours)
  • Caffeine (within 2 hours)
  • Skin lesions at the cream application site
  • Pregnancy
  • Failure to understand instructions
  • Daytime pain reported by participant on day of experimentation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Université de Picardie Jules Verne

Amiens, France

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Sarvestani M, Orakifar N, Mofateh R, Seyedtabib M, Karimi M, Mehravar M. The Association Between Lower Limb Joint Position Sense and Different Aspects of Gait Pattern in Individuals With Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis. J Appl Biomech. 2025 Jan 3;41(2):107-116. doi: 10.1123/jab.2024-0207. Print 2025 Apr 1.

    PMID: 39753124BACKGROUND
  • Bogen B, Moe-Nilssen R, Ranhoff AH, Aaslund MK. The walk ratio: Investigation of invariance across walking conditions and gender in community-dwelling older people. Gait Posture. 2018 Mar;61:479-482. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

    PMID: 29494821BACKGROUND
  • Nishi Y, Osumi M, Sumitani M, Yozu A, Morioka S. Kinematic changes in goal-directed movements in a fear-conditioning paradigm. Sci Rep. 2021 May 27;11(1):11162. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90518-7.

    PMID: 34045515BACKGROUND
  • Karos K, Meulders A, Gatzounis R, Seelen HAM, Geers RPG, Vlaeyen JWS. Fear of pain changes movement: Motor behaviour following the acquisition of pain-related fear. Eur J Pain. 2017 Sep;21(8):1432-1442. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1044. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

    PMID: 28444803BACKGROUND
  • Horvath A, Koteles F, Szabo A. Nocebo effects on motor performance: A systematic literature review. Scand J Psychol. 2021 Oct;62(5):665-674. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12753. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

    PMID: 34145580BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Control Groups

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Officials

  • Thierry Lelard, PhD

    Lecturer

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Maryne Cozette, PhD

    Lecturer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Jennifer Burgos-Tirado, Master

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants are not aware that a cream applied to them (neutral cream) does not produce any pain.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Researcher - Ph.D student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2025

First Posted

April 16, 2025

Study Start

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion

October 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2028

Last Updated

September 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Participants consented to data use only for this specific study under CERSTAPS-approved protocols. French and EU GDPR regulations prohibit broad sharing of pseudonymized sensor/video data that could potentially be re-identified (e.g., physical features in GoPro videos, unique gait patterns).

Locations