Tofacitinib vs Methotrexate for Severe Alopecia Areata (TOFA-MTX-AA)
TOFA-MTX-AA
Comparative Clinical Efficacy of Tofacitinib Versus Methotrexate in Severe Alopecia Areata, Alopecia Totalis, and Alopecia Universalis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
78
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study will compare two oral medicines-tofacitinib and methotrexate-for treating severe alopecia areata, including alopecia totalis (loss of all scalp hair) and alopecia universalis (loss of scalp and body hair). Alopecia areata is an autoimmune condition that can cause significant hair loss and emotional distress. Adults aged 18 to 60 years with severe disease will be enrolled at the Department of Dermatology, MTI-Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, after ethical approval and written informed consent. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily or methotrexate 0.2-0.4 mg/kg once weekly for 12 weeks. The main outcome will be improvement in hair loss measured by the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score. Treatment will be considered effective if there is more than 50% improvement in SALT score from baseline at the end of 12 weeks. Safety will be monitored during follow-up visits. The findings may help guide treatment decisions for severe alopecia areata in our local population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2026
February 12, 2026
February 1, 2026
6 months
February 5, 2026
February 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score
SALT score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater scalp hair loss. The primary outcome is the change in SALT score from baseline to week 12, compared between the tofacitinib and methotrexate groups.
Week 12
Study Arms (2)
Tofacitinib 10 mg Twice Daily
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive oral tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. Clinical response will be assessed using the SALT score at baseline and at week 12. Efficacy is defined as \>50% improvement in SALT score from baseline.
Methotrexate 0.2-0.4 mg/kg Weekly
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive oral methotrexate 0.2-0.4 mg/kg once weekly for 12 weeks with routine follow-up and laboratory monitoring for adverse effects as per institutional protocol. Clinical response will be assessed using the SALT score at baseline and at week 12. Efficacy is defined as \>50% improvement in SALT score from baseline.
Interventions
Oral methotrexate 0.2-0.4 mg/kg once weekly for 12 weeks, with routine monitoring for adverse effects as per institutional protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18-60 years.
- Clinical diagnosis of severe alopecia areata, alopecia totalis, or alopecia universalis (as per protocol/operational definition), confirmed by a consultant dermatologist.
- Either sex.
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving or recently used any systemic treatment intended for hair regrowth for alopecia areata (e.g., systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, JAK inhibitors).
- Pregnant women.
- History or clinical evidence of renal, hepatic, or pulmonary disease.
- Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes participation unsafe or interferes with adherence to the study protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (15)
Abe DT, Tashima LM, Basilio FMA, Mulinari-Brenner F. Clinical experience with oral tofacitinib in a patient with alopecia areata universalis and rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Trichology. 2020;12(4):188-90.
RESULTAsma JK, Huma AS, Urooj M. A study on the role of tofacitinib among patients treated with alopecia areata. Pak J Med Health Sc. 2022;16(12):801-3.
RESULTIorizzo M, Tosti A. Emerging drugs for alopecia areata: JAK inhibitors. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2018;23(1):77-81.
RESULTCervantes J, Jimenez JJ, DelCanto GM, Tosti A. Treatment of alopecia areata with simvastatin/ezetimibe. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2018;19(1):S25-S31.
RESULTStrazzulla LC, Avila L, Lo Sicco K, Shapiro J. an overview of the biology of platelet-rich plasma and microneedling as potential treatments for alopecia areata. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2018;19(1):S21-S24.
RESULTLee S, Kim BJ, Lee YB, Lee WS. Hair Regrowth outcomes of contact immunotherapy for patients with alopecia areata: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(10):1145-51.
RESULTRo BI. Alopecia areata in Korea (1982-1994). J Dermatol. 1995;22(11):858-64.
RESULTMelo DF, Dutra TBS, Baggieri VMAC, Tortelly VD. Intralesional betamethasone as a therapeutic option for alopecia areata. an Bras Dermatol. 2018;93(2):311-12
RESULTChu TW, AlJasser M, Alharbi A, Abahussein O, McElwee K, Shapiro J, et al. Benefit of different concentrations of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide in alopecia areata: an intrasubject pilot study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(2):338-40.
RESULTMessenger AG, McKillop J, Farrant P, McDonagh AJ, Sladden M. British Association of Dermatologists' guidelines for the management of alopecia areata 2012. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(5):916-26.
RESULTRajabi F, Drake LA, Senna MM, Rezaei N. Alopecia areata: a review of disease pathogenesis. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(5):1033-48.
RESULTMirzoyev SA, Schrum AG, Davis MDP, Torgerson RR. Lifetime incidence risk of alopecia areata estimated at 2.1% by Rochester Epidemiology Project, 1990-2009. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(4):1141-2.
RESULTSafavi KH, Muller SA, Suman VJ, Moshell AN, Melton LJ. Incidence of alopecia areata in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1975 through 1989. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70(7):628-33
RESULTPratt CH, King LE, Messenger AG, Christiano AM, Sundberg JP. Alopecia areata. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17011.
RESULTGilhar A, Etzioni A, Paus R. Alopecia areata. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(16):1515-5.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- This is an open-label trial. Due to different dosing schedules and monitoring requirements for the two interventions, blinding of participants, treating clinicians, investigators, and outcome assessors will not be feasible.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PGR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2026
First Posted
February 12, 2026
Study Start
February 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 15, 2026
Last Updated
February 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because this is an investigator-initiated, single-center study and data sharing is not covered in the participant consent/IRB approvals. De-identified aggregate results will be reported in publications and presentations. De-identified data may be considered for sharing in the future upon reasonable request after publication, subject to additional ethical approvals and a data use agreement.