Navigation Intervention for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors
Adaptation and Implementation of an Evidence-Based Patient Navigation Intervention for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors
2 other identifiers
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators propose to: 1) Adapt an evidence-based cancer-focused patient navigation (PN) program for the Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) cancer survivor population; and 2) Plan and conduct an effectiveness-implementation trial of this program within Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). PLEASE NOTE: This study is awarded in two phases. The UG3 phase has been awarded for the first two years; upon successful completion of this phase by meeting pre-defined milestones, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) will provide funding for the second phase of the study (Years 3-6), which will allow our team to conduct a trial to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of the adapted PN program for the AYA cancer survivor population. This application is focused on the initial UG3 phase and will update the protocol for the UH3 trial upon successful completion of the UG3 milestones and receipt of the UH3 award. The primary objectives in the UG3 phase of the study are to adapt and tailor an existing PN program to meet the needs of AYA cancer survivors and the local clinical context via (a) interviews with key stakeholders (patients, clinicians, administrators) and (b) guidance from our AYA Primary Care Survivorship Council. The investigators will conduct a pilot study of the adapted PN program and refine the program to enhance acceptability to patients and clinicians, enhance feasibility and effectiveness, and develop and pilot evaluation tools and methods prior to the start of the UH3 phase of the trial, which will be a larger trial. Objectives will be updated for the UH3 phase once awarded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Mar 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2027
July 6, 2026
February 1, 2026
1.2 years
February 5, 2026
July 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Perceived Health Competence Scale
Patient survey outcome; 8 items measured on a Likert scale (1-5) with higher scores associated with higher health competence
From enrollment to completion at 6 months post-enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Weiner's Appropriateness, Acceptability, and Feasibility
From enrollment to completion at 6 months post-enrollment
Weiner's Appropriateness, Acceptability, and Feasibility
Baseline to 6 months post-patient enrollment into navigation program
Study Arms (1)
Adapted Patient Navigation Program
EXPERIMENTALThe primary objectives in the UG3 phase of the study are to adapt and tailor an existing patient navigation program to meet the needs of AYA cancer survivors and the local clinical context. Adolescent and young adult cancer survivors will be enrolled in a single arm pilot study of the adapted navigation program.
Interventions
In the UG3 phase, the investigators will be adapting a patient navigation intervention to suit adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and conducting a single-site pilot test of the adapted intervention. The investigators will conduct a pilot test of the adapted AYA PN program at a single participating site, focusing on the perceptual implementation outcomes of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility and the hypothesized patient navigation program outcomes of increased motivation, capability, and opportunity for care. The pilot will also include testing of the patient identification algorithm, patient enrollment/engagement methods, clinical workflow, survey recruitment methods, and health IT elements (e.g., access, ease of use).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Received diagnosis of local or regional breast, ovarian, cervical, testicular, colon/rectal, melanoma, endometrial, sarcoma, or thyroid cancer between the ages of 15-39 years ("index cancer")
- Current age 21-45 years
- Diagnosed and treated for index cancer within Kaiser Permanente Southern California adult medical oncology and/or surgery
- Current Kaiser Permanente insurance coverage
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a history of or current diagnosis of leukemia or lymphoma
- Patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kaiser Permanentelead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
KP Southern California - Department of Research & Evaluation
Pasadena, California, 91101, United States
Related Publications (21)
Nekhlyudov L, O'malley DM, Hudson SV. Integrating primary care providers in the care of cancer survivors: gaps in evidence and future opportunities. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):e30-e38. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30570-8.
PMID: 28049575BACKGROUNDMcCabe MS, Partridge AH, Grunfeld E, Hudson MM. Risk-based health care, the cancer survivor, the oncologist, and the primary care physician. Semin Oncol. 2013 Dec;40(6):804-12. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.09.004.
PMID: 24331199BACKGROUNDDiMartino L LP, Mittman B. Increasing the quantity and quality of coordinating center activity in implementation science: A novel application of core function/form concepts. . presented at: Paper accepted at 16th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and implementation; December 10-13, 2023 Washington, DC;.
BACKGROUNDLengnick-Hall R, Stadnick NA, Dickson KS, Moullin JC, Aarons GA. Forms and functions of bridging factors: specifying the dynamic links between outer and inner contexts during implementation and sustainment. Implement Sci. 2021 Apr 1;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01099-y.
PMID: 33794956BACKGROUNDEsmail LC, Barasky R, Mittman BS, Hickam DH. Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):875-881. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06093-6. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
PMID: 33107006BACKGROUNDPerez Jolles M, Lengnick-Hall R, Mittman BS. Core Functions and Forms of Complex Health Interventions: a Patient-Centered Medical Home Illustration. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):1032-1038. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4818-7. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
PMID: 30623387BACKGROUNDKhor S, Heagerty PJ, Basu A, Haupt EC, Lyons LJL, Hahn EE, Bansal A. Racial Disparities in the Ascertainment of Cancer Recurrence in Electronic Health Records. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Jun;7:e2300004. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00004.
PMID: 37267516BACKGROUNDHahn EE, Munoz-Plaza CE, Pounds D, Lyons LJ, Lee JS, Shen E, Hong BD, La Cava S, Brasfield FM, Durna LN, Kwan KW, Beard DB, Ferreira A, Padmanabhan A, Gould MK. Effect of a Community-Based Medical Oncology Depression Screening Program on Behavioral Health Referrals Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 Jan 4;327(1):41-49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22596.
PMID: 34982119BACKGROUNDXie F, Lee J, Munoz-Plaza CE, Hahn EE, Chen W. Application of Text Information Extraction System for Real-Time Cancer Case Identification in an Integrated Healthcare Organization. J Pathol Inform. 2017 Dec 14;8:48. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_55_17. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29416911BACKGROUNDCook AJ, Delong E, Murray DM, Vollmer WM, Heagerty PJ. Statistical lessons learned for designing cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trials from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory Biostatistics and Design Core. Clin Trials. 2016 Oct;13(5):504-12. doi: 10.1177/1740774516646578. Epub 2016 May 13.
PMID: 27179253BACKGROUNDNIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory. Rethinking Clinical Trials: A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Accessed on 1/30/2024: https://rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/.
BACKGROUNDTuzzio L, Larson EB. The Promise of Pragmatic Clinical Trials Embedded in Learning Health Systems. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Apr 3;7(1):10. doi: 10.5334/egems.285.
PMID: 30972359BACKGROUNDLoudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015 May 8;350:h2147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2147. No abstract available.
PMID: 25956159BACKGROUNDCurran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
PMID: 22310560BACKGROUNDKanter MH, Lindsay G, Bellows J, Chase A. Complete care at Kaiser Permanente: transforming chronic and preventive care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Nov;39(11):484-94. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39064-3.
PMID: 24294676BACKGROUNDHenry SL, Shen E, Ahuja A, Gould MK, Kanter MH. The Online Personal Action Plan: A Tool to Transform Patient-Enabled Preventive and Chronic Care. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.11.014. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
PMID: 26826751BACKGROUNDCohen AJ, Russell LE, Elwy AR, Mitchell KM, Cornell PY, Silva JW, Moy E, Kennedy MA. Adaptation of a social risk screening and referral initiative across clinical populations, settings, and contexts in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health System. Front Health Serv. 2023 Jan 30;2:958969. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.958969. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36925883BACKGROUNDRabin BA, McCreight M, Battaglia C, Ayele R, Burke RE, Hess PL, Frank JW, Glasgow RE. Systematic, Multimethod Assessment of Adaptations Across Four Diverse Health Systems Interventions. Front Public Health. 2018 Apr 9;6:102. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00102. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29686983BACKGROUNDEscoffery C, Lebow-Skelley E, Udelson H, Boing EA, Wood R, Fernandez ME, Mullen PD. A scoping study of frameworks for adapting public health evidence-based interventions. Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jan 1;9(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx067.
PMID: 29346635BACKGROUNDChambers DA. Advancing adaptation of evidence-based interventions through implementation science: progress and opportunities. Front Health Serv. 2023 Jun 5;3:1204138. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1204138. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37342795BACKGROUNDKirk MA, Moore JE, Wiltsey Stirman S, Birken SA. Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations' impact: the model for adaptation design and impact (MADI). Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 20;15(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01021-y.
PMID: 32690104BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erin E Hahn, PhD
Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Department of Research & Evaluation
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2026
First Posted
February 12, 2026
Study Start
March 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share