Navigation Intervention for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors
Adaptation and Implementation of an Evidence-Based Patient Navigation Intervention for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors
2 other identifiers
interventional
25
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The investigators propose to: 1) Adapt an evidence-based cancer-focused patient navigation (PN) program for the Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) cancer survivor population; and 2) Plan and conduct an effectiveness-implementation trial of this program within Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). PLEASE NOTE: This study is awarded in two phases. The UG3 phase has been awarded for the first two years; upon successful completion of this phase by meeting pre-defined milestones, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) will provide funding for the second phase of the study (Years 3-6), which will allow our team to conduct a trial to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of the adapted PN program for the AYA cancer survivor population. This application is focused on the initial UG3 phase and will update the protocol for the UH3 trial upon successful completion of the UG3 milestones and receipt of the UH3 award. The primary objectives in the UG3 phase of the study are to adapt and tailor an existing PN program to meet the needs of AYA cancer survivors and the local clinical context via (a) interviews with key stakeholders (patients, clinicians, administrators) and (b) guidance from our AYA Primary Care Survivorship Council. The investigators will conduct a pilot study of the adapted PN program and refine the program to enhance acceptability to patients and clinicians, enhance feasibility and effectiveness, and develop and pilot evaluation tools and methods prior to the start of the UH3 phase of the trial, which will be a larger trial. Objectives will be updated for the UH3 phase once awarded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Nov 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2027
February 25, 2026
February 1, 2026
7 months
February 5, 2026
February 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Perceived Health Competence Scale
Patient survey outcome; 8 items measured on a Likert scale (1-5) with higher scores associated with higher health competence
From enrollment to completion at 6 months post-enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Weiner's Appropriateness, Acceptability, and Feasibility
From enrollment to completion at 6 months post-enrollment
Weiner's Appropriateness, Acceptability, and Feasibility
Baseline to 6 months post-patient enrollment into navigation program
Study Arms (1)
Adapted Patient Navigation Program
EXPERIMENTALThe primary objectives in the UG3 phase of the study are to adapt and tailor an existing patient navigation program to meet the needs of AYA cancer survivors and the local clinical context. Adolescent and young adult cancer survivors will be enrolled in a single arm pilot study of the adapted navigation program.
Interventions
In the UG3 phase, the investigators will be adapting a patient navigation intervention to suit adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and conducting a single-site pilot test of the adapted intervention. The investigators will conduct a pilot test of the adapted AYA PN program at a single participating site, focusing on the perceptual implementation outcomes of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility and the hypothesized patient navigation program outcomes of increased motivation, capability, and opportunity for care. The pilot will also include testing of the patient identification algorithm, patient enrollment/engagement methods, clinical workflow, survey recruitment methods, and health IT elements (e.g., access, ease of use).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Received diagnosis of local or regional breast, ovarian, cervical, testicular, colon/rectal, melanoma, endometrial, sarcoma, or thyroid cancer between the ages of 15-39 years ("index cancer")
- Current age 21-45 years
- Diagnosed and treated for index cancer within Kaiser Permanente Southern California
- Current Kaiser Permanente insurance coverage
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a history of or current diagnosis of leukemia or lymphoma
- Patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kaiser Permanentelead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Related Publications (21)
Nekhlyudov L, O'Malley D M, Hudson SV. Integrating primary care providers in the care of cancer survivors: gaps in evidence and future opportunities. Lancet Oncol. Jan 2017;18(1):e30-e38. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30570-8
BACKGROUNDMcCabe MS, Partridge AH, Grunfeld E, Hudson MM. Risk-based health care, the cancer survivor, the oncologist, and the primary care physician. Seminars in oncology. Dec 2013;40(6):804-12. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.09.004
BACKGROUNDDiMartino L LP, Mittman B. Increasing the quantity and quality of coordinating center activity in implementation science: A novel application of core function/form concepts. . presented at: Paper accepted at 16th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and implementation; December 10-13, 2023 Washington, DC;.
BACKGROUNDLengnick-Hall R, Stadnick NA, Dickson KS, Moullin JC, Aarons GA. Forms and functions of bridging factors: specifying the dynamic links between outer and inner contexts during implementation and sustainment. Implementation Science. 2021/04/01 2021;16(1):34. doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01099-y
BACKGROUNDEsmail LC, Barasky R, Mittman BS, Hickam DH. Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). J Gen Intern Med. Nov 2020;35(Suppl 2):875-881. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06093-6
BACKGROUNDPerez Jolles M, Lengnick-Hall R, Mittman BS. Core Functions and Forms of Complex Health Interventions: a Patient-Centered Medical Home Illustration. J Gen Intern Med. Jun 2019;34(6):1032-1038. doi:10.1007/s11606-018- 4818-7
BACKGROUNDKhor S HP, Basu A, Haupt EC, Lyons LJ, Hahn EE, Bansal A. Racial Disparities in the Ascertainment of Cancer Recurrence in Electronic Health Records. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. 2023;e2300004
BACKGROUNDHahn EE M-PC, Pounds D, Lyons LJ, Lee JS, Shen E, Hong BD, La Cava S, Brasfield FM, Durna LN, Kwan KW. Effect of a community-based medical oncology depression screening program on behavioral health referrals among patients with breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2022;327(1):41-49.
BACKGROUNDXie F, Lee J, Munoz-Plaza CE, Hahn EE, Chen W. Application of Text Information Extraction System for Real-Time Cancer Case Identification in an Integrated Healthcare Organization. J Pathol Inform. 2017;8:48. doi:10.4103. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_55_17
BACKGROUNDCook AJ, Delong E, Murray DM, Vollmer WM, Heagerty PJ. Statistical lessons learned for designing cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trials from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory Biostatistics and Design Core. Clin Trials. Oct 2016;13(5):504-12. doi:10.1177/1740774516646578
BACKGROUNDNIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory. Rethinking Clinical Trials: A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Accessed on 1/30/2024: https://rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/.
BACKGROUND107. Tuzzio L, Larson EB. The Promise of Pragmatic Clinical Trials Embedded in Learning Health Systems. EGEMS (Wash DC). Apr 3 2019;7(1):10. doi:10.5334/egems.285
BACKGROUNDKirsty L, Shaun T, Frank S, Peter D, Kevin ET, Merrick Z. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ : British Medical Journal. 2015;350:h2147. doi:10.1136/bmj.h2147
BACKGROUNDCurran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Medical care. 2012;50(3):217-226. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812
BACKGROUNDKanter MH LG, Bellows J, Chase A. Complete care at Kaiser Permanente: transforming chronic and preventive care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2013;39(11):484-94.
BACKGROUNDHenry SL, Shen E, Ahuja A, Gould MK, Kanter MH. The Online Personal Action Plan: A Tool to Transform Patient- Enabled Preventive and Chronic Care. American journal of preventive medicine. Jul 2016;51(1):71-7. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.11.014
BACKGROUNDCohen AJ, Russell LE, Elwy AR, et al. Adaptation of a social risk screening and referral initiative across clinical populations, settings, and contexts in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health System. Original Research. Frontiers in Health Services. 2023;2
BACKGROUNDRabin BA, McCreight M, Battaglia C, et al. Systematic, Multimethod Assessment of Adaptations Across Four Diverse Health Systems Interventions. Methods. Frontiers in Public Health. 2018;6
BACKGROUNDEscoffery C, Lebow-Skelley E, Udelson H, Böing EA, Wood R, Fernandez ME, Mullen PD. A scoping study of frameworks for adapting public health evidence-based interventions. Transl Behav Med. Jan 1 2019;9(1):1-10. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibx067
BACKGROUNDChambers DA. Advancing adaptation of evidence-based interventions through implementation science: progress and opportunities. Perspective. Frontiers in Health Services. 2023;3
BACKGROUNDKirk MA, Moore JE, Wiltsey Stirman S, Birken SA. Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations' impact: the model for adaptation design and impact (MADI). Implementation Science. 2020/07/20 2020;15(1):56. doi:10.1186/s13012-020-01021-y
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erin E Hahn, PhD
Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Department of Research & Evaluation
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2026
First Posted
February 12, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share