The Effectiveness of the Three-dimensional Biochemical Activity Model of Pain
Effect of Three-Dimensional Educational Material Developed for Pain Mechanisms on Motivation and Knowledge Levels
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: In this study, it was aimed to develop a pain biochemical activity model taken from a three-dimensional printer and fixed by applying epoxy resin and to investigate the effect of this model on nursing students' understanding of the pain mechanism and their motivation to learn. Methods: The universe of the study consisted of students enrolled in the Biochemistry course at the faculty of nursing of a university in the north of Türkiye during the spring semester of the 2023-2024 academic year. Students were divided into three strata based on their achievement average: high (75 and above), moderate (55-75), and low (54 and below). Forty-five students from each stratum were selected using computer-assisted randomization and assigned to the intervention and control groups. "Student Identification Form", "Pain Mechanism Information Form", "Instructional Material Motivation Scale" and The CONSORT checklist were used to collect data.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2026
CompletedFebruary 5, 2026
October 1, 2025
5 months
November 27, 2025
January 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Student Identification Form
This form including students' age, gender, high school type, native language, whether they choose a career voluntarily, and whether they have received previous training on pain.
This form consisted of six questions and was administered to students one hour prior to the training.
Pain Mechanism Information Form
The Pain Mechanism Information Form was developed by the researchers based on literature. The developed questionnaire consists of 14 items, each prepared in a short-answer and fill-in-the-blank format. The scope of the Pain Mechanism Information Form includes: Pain physiology and classification, structure of nociceptors and pain transmission pathways, chemical mediators (Bradykinin, Prostaglandin, Serotonin, CGRP, Substance-P, Histamine), peripheral nerve ending release and mast cell activation, and vascular effects of inflammation (vasodilation, edema). Five experts were consulted to ensure the validity of the Pain Mechanism Information Form. Each item was reviewed for its appropriateness and clarity for the intended learning outcomes and content, and necessary revisions were made based on the expert opinions. To ensure reliability, scoring was assessed for short-answer tests, and the questionnaires were scored separately by two raters. The inter-rater reliability coefficient (Cohen'
This form was applied to students 15 minutes before the training began and 5 minutes after the training ended.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Instructional Material Motivation Scale
This form was applied to students 30 minutes after the training ended.
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALStudents in the intervention group received one hour of training on pain by the same researcher, using a 3D-printed pain biochemical activity model.
control group
OTHERStudents in the control group received one hour of training on pain by the same researcher, using face-to-face instruction and PowerPoint presentations. To avoid interaction between the two laboratories, the control group received training first, followed immediately by the intervention group, who were then transferred to the other laboratory.
Interventions
Computer-generated drawings designed to explain the biochemical mechanism of pain were created using plastic filaments from a 3D printer. Students were divided into small groups of nine using the resulting figures, and the processes of pain mechanisms were explained. At the end of the session, the figures were fixed by applying epoxy resin. After the students poured the epoxy resin onto the models in liquid form, it solidified within six hours, securing the shape as a transparent layer.
Students in the control group received one hour of training on pain by the same researcher, using face-to-face instruction and PowerPoint presentations. To avoid interaction between the two laboratories, the control group received training first, followed immediately by the intervention group, who were then transferred to the other laboratory.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being over 18 years old
- Participating voluntarily in the research
- Not having received any previous training in pain
- Being a native Turkish speaker
You may not qualify if:
- Being under 18 years old
- Not participating voluntarily in the research
- Having received any previous training in pain
- Not being a native Turkish speaker
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
Zonguldak, Zonguldak Province, 67100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (6)
Ortiz, M. I., Cuevas-Suarez, C. E., Carino-Cortes, R., de Jesús Navarrete-Hernández, J., & Gonzalez-Montiel, C. A. (2022). Nurses knowledge and attitude regarding pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education in Practice, 63, 103390.
RESULTErickson JM, Brashers V, Owen J, Marks JR, Thomas SM. Effectiveness of an interprofessional workshop on pain management for medical and nursing students. J Interprof Care. 2016 Jul;30(4):466-74. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1159185. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
PMID: 27268513RESULTMurphy-Smith MT, Samawi Z, Abbott P. Teaching Strategies for Nonpharmacological Pain Management to Nursing Students. Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Oct;25(5):474-479. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 May 6.
PMID: 38714423RESULTCousins M, Lane-Krebs K, Matthews J, Johnston-Devin C. Student nurses' pain knowledge and attitudes towards pain management over the last 20 years: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105169. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105169. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
PMID: 34653890RESULTAlshehri FA, Levett-Jones T, Pich J. Nursing students' knowledge of and attitudes towards pain management: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Aug;139:106207. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106207. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
PMID: 38669861RESULTAdillon C, Lozano E, Salvat I. Comparison of pain neurophysiology knowledge among health sciences students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 22;8:592. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1585-y.
PMID: 26493565RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Ahmet Erdogan Health Services Vocational School, Health Care Services Program
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2025
First Posted
February 5, 2026
Study Start
May 12, 2024
Primary Completion
October 12, 2024
Study Completion
August 12, 2025
Last Updated
February 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share