Comparing Two PFO Closure Devices in Adults With Previous Stroke or TIA
SAFE-PFO
Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Safety and EfficAcy of the Cocoon PFO Occluder Versus Amplatzer PFO ClosurE Device for Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With a History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack A Non-Profit, Single-blind, Investigator Driven Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
1,260
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blind, investigator-driven, non-profit clinical trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of the Cocoon PFO Occluder with the Amplatzer PFO Occluder family in patients requiring percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO). Eligible participants are adults with a history of cryptogenic embolic stroke or neurologically confirmed transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the previous 12 months and a PFO suitable for transcatheter closure. A total of up to 1260 subjects will be enrolled across multiple European centers. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive either the Cocoon PFO Occluder (experimental group) or an Amplatzer PFO closure device (control group). The procedure will be performed as soon as possible after randomization, preferably within 14 days and no later than 45 days. The primary endpoint is a non-inferiority comparison of a composite outcome at 12 months, including recurrent ischemic stroke, TIA, or all-cause death. Secondary endpoints include PFO closure rate at 6 months, assessed by echocardiographic imaging, and other measures of safety, device performance, and clinical outcomes. The study is conducted in a single-blind fashion: patients will not be informed of the device they receive unless they explicitly request this information. Any patient who chooses to be unblinded will continue to participate without affecting eligibility or follow-up, and the date of unblinding will be documented to allow appropriate sensitivity analyses. This trial aims to provide robust comparative evidence on the clinical performance of the Cocoon PFO Occluder relative to the Amplatzer PFO Occluder to guide optimal device selection in patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA associated with PFO.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2028
March 24, 2026
March 1, 2026
2 years
November 25, 2025
March 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite endpoint of recurrent ischemic stroke, TIA, or all-cause death at 12 months
A non-inferiority comparison between the Cocoon PFO Occluder and the Amplatzer PFO Occluder in terms of a composite endpoint including: 1. Recurrent ischemic stroke, defined as an acute focal neurological deficit presumed to result from focal ischemia, with symptoms lasting ≥24 hours, or \<24 hours if accompanied by MRI or CT evidence of a new, anatomically relevant cerebral infarct. 2. Transient ischemic attack (TIA), defined as an acute focal neurological deficit (e.g., focal motor deficit, aphasia, gait disturbance, hemisensory deficit, amaurosis fugax, blindness, or focal visual deficit) presumed due to focal ischemia, lasting between 5 minutes and 24 hours, and not associated with MRI or CT evidence of a new infarct. Clinical evaluation by a neurologist is required. 3. All-cause mortality.
12 months after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (15)
PFO Closure Rate
6 months
Composite of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke, TIA, or Death
30 days and 6 months
Neurological Death
30 days, 6 months, 12 months
Cardiovascular Death
30 days, 6 months, 12 months
Recurrent Symptomatic Non-Fatal Stroke
30 days, 6 months, 12 months
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cocoon PFO Occluder - experimental
EXPERIMENTALParticipants undergo percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Cocoon PFO Occluder device. The procedure is performed under standard clinical practice. Follow-up includes echocardiographic assessment of PFO closure and routine clinical evaluations. Participants are assigned to the two study arms using a 3:1 randomization scheme (Cocoon PFO Occluder : Amplatzer PFO Occluder).
Amplatzer PFO Occluder - Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants undergo percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder device, considered the current standard of care. Follow-up includes echocardiographic assessment of PFO closure and routine clinical evaluations. Participants are assigned to the two study arms using a 3:1 randomization scheme (Cocoon PFO Occluder : Amplatzer PFO Occluder).
Interventions
Percutaneous PFO closure performed according to standard clinical practice. The procedure is scheduled within 45 days after randomization and includes initiation of dual antiplatelet therapy before the intervention. Closure is performed following the Instructions for Use (IFU) of the assigned device and is guided by intracardiac echocardiography or transesophageal echocardiography. After device implantation, patients undergo routine post-procedure assessment and are instructed to follow antiplatelet therapy consistent with European clinical practice guidelines. Endocarditis prophylaxis is recommended for six months. The procedural steps are identical for both study arms; the only difference is the device implanted (Cocoon PFO Occluder or Amplatzer PFO Occluder). Participants are assigned to the two study arms using a 3:1 randomization scheme (Cocoon PFO Occluder : Amplatzer PFO Occluder).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with \>18 years of age and \<65 years of age, regardless of gender
- Patients with normal or aneurysm type PFO confirmed by imaging examination \[Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)/ Transesophageal Echocardiography (TOE) or Intracardiac Echocardiography\], and who exhibit spontaneous right-to-left shunting or right-to-left shunting during Valsalva maneuver.
- Patients with history of cryptogenic embolic stroke or transient ischemic attack in the previous 12 months \[stroke is defined as acute focal neurological deficit presumed to be due to focal ischemia, and either 1) symptoms persisting 24 hours or greater, or 2) symptoms persisting less than 24 hours but associated with MR or CT findings of a new, neuroanatomically relevant, cerebral infarct. Transient Ischemic Attack is defined as acute focal neurological deficit (defined as focal motor deficit, aphasia, difficulty walking, hemisensory deficit, amaurosis fugax, blindness, or focal visual deficit) presumed due to focal ischemia, lasting between 5 minutes and 24 hours, that is not associated with MR or CT findings of a new cerebral infarct\]. The diagnosis of cryptogenic embolic stroke or TIA has to be confirmed by a neurologist.
- The size of PFO must be amenable to selection of a Cocoon PFO Occluder or Amplatzer PFO closure device.
- Patients are informed of the nature of the trial and agree to all requirements for participation in the trial, signed the informed consent form, and agreed to complete the follow-up and follow-up examination
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have definite causes of stroke or transient ischemic attack unrelated to the PFO
- RLS caused by other causes, such as atrial septal defect or pulmonary arteriovenous shunt
- Patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (chronic or intermittent) Intracardiac thrombus or tumor
- Patients with mitral or aortic valve stenosis or severe regurgitation
- Mitral or aortic valve vegetation or prosthesis
- Active endocarditis or other untreated infectious diseases
- Dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<35%
- Left ventricular aneurysm or akinesis Myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris within 12 months
- Previous intracardiac surgery or percutaneous PFO-closure
- Atherosclerosis or arteriopathy of intra- or extracranial vessels with \>50% diameter stenosis in the artery supplying the infarcted territory.
- Patients with non-embolic cryptogenic stroke (for example lacunar stroke) or with other identifiable causes of stroke, including but not limited to aortic arch plaques (protruding \>4 mm into the lumen), large artery atherosclerotic disease, an established cardioembolic source, small-vessel occlusive disease, or arterial dissection
- Glomerular filtration rate \< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or with any history of renal dialysis or renal transplantation
- Severe liver function impairment (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal value)
- Severe pulmonary disease including pulmonary hypertension (clinical diagnosis)
- +13 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Giuseppe Tarantinilead
- Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limitedcollaborator
Related Publications (8)
Testa L, Popolo Rubbio A, Squillace M, Albano F, Cesario V, Casenghi M, Tarantini G, Pagnotta P, Ielasi A, Popusoi G, Paloscia L, Durante A, Maffeo D, Meucci F, Valentini G, Ussia GP, Cioffi P, Cortese B, Sangiorgi G, Contegiacomo G, Bedogni F. Patent foramen ovale occlusion with the Cocoon PFO Occluder. The PROS-IT collaborative project. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 11;9:1064026. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1064026. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36712245BACKGROUNDTurc G, Calvet D, Guerin P, Sroussi M, Chatellier G, Mas JL; CLOSE Investigators. Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta-Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 17;7(12):e008356. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008356.
PMID: 29910193BACKGROUNDLee PH, Song JK, Kim JS, Heo R, Lee S, Kim DH, Song JM, Kang DH, Kwon SU, Kang DW, Lee D, Kwon HS, Yun SC, Sun BJ, Park JH, Lee JH, Jeong HS, Song HJ, Kim J, Park SJ. Cryptogenic Stroke and High-Risk Patent Foramen Ovale: The DEFENSE-PFO Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2335-2342. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.046. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
PMID: 29544871BACKGROUNDMas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B, Massardier E, Hosseini H, Mechtouff L, Arquizan C, Bejot Y, Vuillier F, Detante O, Guidoux C, Canaple S, Vaduva C, Dequatre-Ponchelle N, Sibon I, Garnier P, Ferrier A, Timsit S, Robinet-Borgomano E, Sablot D, Lacour JC, Zuber M, Favrole P, Pinel JF, Apoil M, Reiner P, Lefebvre C, Guerin P, Piot C, Rossi R, Dubois-Rande JL, Eicher JC, Meneveau N, Lusson JR, Bertrand B, Schleich JM, Godart F, Thambo JB, Leborgne L, Michel P, Pierard L, Turc G, Barthelet M, Charles-Nelson A, Weimar C, Moulin T, Juliard JM, Chatellier G; CLOSE Investigators. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 14;377(11):1011-1021. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705915.
PMID: 28902593BACKGROUNDCarroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, Berry S, MacDonald LA, Marks DS, Tirschwell DL; RESPECT Investigators. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 21;368(12):1092-100. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301440.
PMID: 23514286BACKGROUNDMeier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP, Khattab AA, Hildick-Smith D, Dudek D, Andersen G, Ibrahim R, Schuler G, Walton AS, Wahl A, Windecker S, Juni P; PC Trial Investigators. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 21;368(12):1083-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211716.
PMID: 23514285BACKGROUNDFurlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, Mauri L, Adams H, Albers GW, Felberg R, Herrmann H, Kar S, Landzberg M, Raizner A, Wechsler L; CLOSURE I Investigators. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):991-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009639.
PMID: 22417252BACKGROUNDPristipino C, Sievert H, D'Ascenzo F, Mas JL, Meier B, Scacciatella P, Hildick-Smith D, Gaita F, Toni D, Kyrle P, Thomson J, Derumeaux G, Onorato E, Sibbing D, Germonpre P, Berti S, Chessa M, Bedogni F, Dudek D, Hornung M, Zamorano J; European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI); European Stroke Organisation (ESO); European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI); Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC); ESC Working group on GUCH; ESC Working group on Thrombosis; European Haematological Society (EHA). European position paper on the management of patients with patent foramen ovale. General approach and left circulation thromboembolism. EuroIntervention. 2019 Jan 20;14(13):1389-1402. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00622. No abstract available.
PMID: 30141306BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giuseppe Tarantini, MD, PhD, FESC
University of Padova
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The study is single-blind. Participants are masked to the device used (Cocoon vs. Amplatzer). Treating physicians and study staff involved in the procedure are not blinded due to the nature of the intervention. Participants may request unblinding at any time
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2025
First Posted
February 2, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2028
Last Updated
March 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share