Neck Rescue Access Comparison
eFONA
Emergency Front-of-neck Access in Infants: A Crossover Trial Evaluating Surgical and Percutaneous eFONA Techniques in a Simulated Rabbit Model
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Emergency front-of-neck access (eFONA) represents the final lifesaving intervention in a pediatric "can't intubate, can't oxygenate" scenario. Despite its importance, there is no consensus on the optimal eFONA technique in infants, and existing evidence is limited by low-fidelity models and a lack of randomized crossover comparisons. The objective of this randomized crossover simulation trial is to compare a surgical scalpel-bougie tracheostomy technique with a percutaneous Seldinger-guided technique under standardized, high-fidelity simulated infant emergency conditions. Using a rabbit cadaver model with simulated bleeding, physiological deterioration, and anatomical constraints, the study aims to assess time to successful ventilation and procedure-related injury patterns for both techniques.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
February 6, 2026
February 1, 2026
4 months
January 5, 2026
February 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Performance Time
Performance time between the percutaneous Seldinger-guided tracheal access and the scalpel-bougie tracheostomy technique. If tracheal access was not achieved within two minutes, the attempt was terminated and recorded as unsuccessful.
During the procedure; measured from initial palpation of the trachea until establishment of a secured airway with confirmed lung ventilation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Success rate of emergency front-of-neck airway establishment
During the procedure
rate of thyroid cartilage injuries
Immediately after the procedure (post-procedural inspection)
rate of cricoid injuries
Immediately after the procedure (post-procedural inspection)
number of tracheal ring damaged
Immediately after the procedure (post-procedural inspection)
Study Arms (2)
Percutaneous Seldinger-Guided Tracheal Access (Melker)
ACTIVE COMPARATORMelker technique described in Interventions
scalpel-bougie tracheostomy (SBT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSBT Technique described in Interventions
Interventions
1. The operator palpates and stabilizes the trachea in the midline. A syringe is attached to the introducer needle. 2. The needle is advanced through the skin in the midline with continuous aspiration until intratracheal placement is confirmed by free air aspiration. 3. A flexible guidewire is inserted through the needle into the tracheal lumen. 4. The needle is removed while maintaining the guidewire in position. 5. A dilator with integrated airway catheter is advanced over the guidewire using controlled rotational pressure. 6. After intratracheal placement, the dilator and guidewire are removed. 7. The cuffed airway catheter (inner diameter 3.5 mm) is connected to a ventilation device to establish ventilation.
1\. The assistant places themselves with two preparation clamps at the head end of the table and assists with each hand placed lateral to the neck, so that the operating field is freely accessible. After the trachea or cricoid is palpated, a long median longitudinal skin incision of 2-3 cm is made from the cricoid caudally 2. The assistant uses straight clamps to pull the two edges of the skin incision apart dorso-laterally. In the event of major bleeding this maneuver should allow the blood to drain off dorsally and the view of the anatomical structures should be less impaired. 3. Layer by layer of the anatomical structures are cut through with the scalpel and tightened with the clamps accordingly. 4. Using a longitudinal incision, two to three tracheal rings are cut through distally to the cricoid 5. An 8 FR Frova catheter is inserted through the orifice into trachea. 6. A tracheal tube (ID 3.0 mm) is inserted over the Frova catheter to secure the airway permanently.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- board certified pediatric anesthesiologists or pediatric intensive care doctor
- informed consent signed
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universitätsspital Bern
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2026
First Posted
January 26, 2026
Study Start
February 2, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share