Pediatric Neck Rescue Access Comparison
Pediatric Neck Rescue: Randomized Comparison of Two Emergency Approaches to the Trachea in an Advanced Simulated Rabbit Model
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Two recent studies explored the emergency tracheotomy technique and the scalpel-bougie-tracheostomy technique as a neck rescue access for newborns and infants on a rabbit cadaver. Both studies lacked a key feature of real surgical access - bleeding during a true emergency. The study's objective was to comparatively assess the two techniques in a simulated environment with simulated bleeding and decreasing vital signs from the monitor like in real emergencies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 3, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 8, 2023
CompletedMarch 9, 2023
March 1, 2023
9 months
June 24, 2022
March 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Performance Time
performance time between the rapid sequence tracheotomy technique and the scalpel-bougie tracheostomy technique.
2 min
Secondary Outcomes (4)
rate of cricoid injuries
2 min
Succes rate
2 min
rate of thyroid injuries
2 min
number of tracheal ring damaged
2 min
Study Arms (2)
scalpel-bougie tracheostomy (SBT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSBT technique described in Interventions
rapid sequence tracheotomy (RST
ACTIVE COMPARATORRST technique described in Interventions
Interventions
1. The assistant places themselves with two preparation clamps at the head end of the table and assists with each hand placed lateral to the neck, so that the operating field is freely accessible. After the trachea or cricoid is palpated, a long median longitudinal skin incision of 2-3 cm is made from the cricoid caudally 2. The assistant uses straight clamps to pull the two edges of the skin incision apart dorso-laterally. In the event of major bleeding this maneuver should allow the blood to drain off dorsally and the view of the anatomical structures should be less impaired. 3. Layer by layer of the anatomical structures are cut through with the scalpel and tightened with the clamps accordingly. 4. Using a longitudinal incision, two to three tracheal rings are cut through distally to the cricoid 5. An 8 FR Frova catheter is inserted through the orifice into trachea. 6. A tracheal tube (ID 3.0 mm) is inserted over the Frova catheter to secure the airway permanently.
1. Orientational palpation and vertical midline skin incision followed by separation of the strap muscles 2. Exposure of the trachea and cricoid followed by anterior luxation of the trachea with a Backhaus towel clamp 3. Perform a vertical puncture with a tip scissors between the cricoid and 1st tracheal ring followed by a vertical incision of no more than 2 rings in length. 4. A tracheal tube (inner diameter 3.0 mm, cuffed) is inserted to secure the airway permanently.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- board certified pediatric anesthesiologists or pediatric intensive care doctor
- informed consent signed
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Bern
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Riva T, Goerge S, Fuchs A, Greif R, Huber M, Lusardi AC, Riedel T, Ulmer FF, Disma N. Emergency front-of-neck access in infants: A pragmatic crossover randomized control trial comparing two approaches on a simulated rabbit model. Paediatr Anaesth. 2024 Mar;34(3):225-234. doi: 10.1111/pan.14796. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
PMID: 37950428DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Riva, MD
University of Bern
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PD Dr. med.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2022
First Posted
August 12, 2022
Study Start
May 25, 2022
Primary Completion
March 3, 2023
Study Completion
March 8, 2023
Last Updated
March 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03