Effectiveness of Motorised Lumbar Support for Non-specific Low Back Pain
Effectiveness of a Motorized Lumbar Support for Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Low back pain (LBP) represents a common musculoskeletal conditions worlwide, causing substantial disability and economic burden. While traditional semi-rigid lumbar supports are commonly prescribed to alleviate LBP symptoms, their effectiveness remains limited by their static mechanical properties and lack of adaptability to movement patterns. Motorized lumbar support offer a novel approach by allowing the application of controlled decompressive forces while maintaining functional mobility. This experimental study aims to compare the effectiveness between a motorized lumbar support and a standard semi-rigid support in adults with non-specific LBP. Seventy adults with non-specific low back pain (LBP) will be recruited. Primary outcomes (pain intensity and physical functioning \[daily average\]) will be collected daily, while secondary outcomes (average pain intensity over the last week, pain-related disability, etc.) will be assessed at baseline, 3 and 9 weeks after randomization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2028
April 24, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.5 years
January 9, 2026
April 22, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain intensity
The numeric scale from 0 to 10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain) will be used to rate average pain intensity experienced during the day.
Once a day for three weeks.
Physical functioning
The numeric scale from 0 to 10 (0: no difficulty functioning; 10: inability to function) will be used to rate the ability to carry out daily activities.
Once a day for three weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Pain-related disability
Baseline, week 3 and 9.
Pain intensity
Baseline, week 3 and 9.
Pain catastrophizing
Baseline, week 3 and 9.
Fear of movement
Baseline, week 3 and 9.
Pain self-efficacy
Baseline, week 3 and 9.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Perceived effect of the lumbar support
Once a day for three weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Motorized lumbar support
EXPERIMENTALThe motorized lumbar support is battery-powered orthosis providing adjustable traction between thoracic and pelvic components, and apply controlled decompressive forces while maintaining mobility.
Standard lumbar support
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis is a semi-rigid lumbar support featuring six steel stays, elastic side panels, and a neoprene wrap that allows for individualized adjustment.
Interventions
Participants will be advised to wear motorized lumbar support for a minimum of 4 hours and a maximum of 8 consecutive hours per day throughout the three-week study period. To reach the target of 4 hours, participants will gradually increase their daily wear time : 2 hours on the first day, 3 hours on the second day and 4 hours on the third day.
Participants will be advised to wear motorized lumbar support for a minimum of 4 hours and a maximum of 8 consecutive hours per day throughout the three-week study period. To reach the target of 4 hours, participants will gradually increase their daily wear time : 2 hours on the first day, 3 hours on the second day and 4 hours on the third day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults between 18 and 65 years old with non-specific low back pain.
- Average pain level of ≥3 out of 10 during the previous week.
- Pain-related disability ≥10% at ODI.
- Pain relief must be present during manual traction, measured by a moderate improvement (+3) on a global rating of change scale (anchors: -7 to +7).
You may not qualify if:
- Specific cause of low back pain (e.g., fracture, cancer, spinal stenosis, severe spondylolisthesis)
- Presence of neuropathic pain (leg or back of 4 at the DN4).
- Pregnancy.
- Body mass index \> 32.
- Waist size between 74 and 115 cm.
- Respiratory and circulatory conditions.
- Osteoporosis.
- Paraplegia and hemiplegia.
- Abdominal wounds at the site of the orthosis.
- Rib or pelvic fractures less than 3 months.
- Presence of electronic medical device.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Laval Universitylead
- Corset Saint-Franciscollaborator
- MedTeqcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS)
Québec, Quebec, G1M 2S8, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hugo Massé-Alarie, PhD
Laval University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The statistician will be blinded to the group allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2026
First Posted
January 26, 2026
Study Start
February 16, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Data will become accessible after the publication and will remain accessible for a period of 5 years after initial release.
- Access Criteria
- Access to IPD will be granted to qualified researchers whose proposals are methodologically sound and ethically approved. Researchers must obtain approval from their Institutional Review Board (IRB), Research Ethics Board (REB), or equivalent ethics committee, and must sign a Data Use Agreement (DUA) before receiving any data. Requests for access should be submitted to: hugo.masse-alarie@fmed.ulaval.ca.
Deidentified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in the published article will be made available. The study protocol will also be published.